Smartphone Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
1. Specifications Comparison
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Samsung Galaxy A23 5G | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Design | |||
Dimensions | 159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm | 165.4 × 76.9 × 8.4 mm | A23 5G is taller and wider, might feel slightly less comfortable in hand for some users. |
Weight | 189g | 197g | A52 5G is slightly lighter, potentially more comfortable for long usage. |
Display | |||
Size | 6.5" | 6.6" | Negligible difference, both phones offer similarly sized viewing experience. |
Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2408 | Near identical sharpness, no visible difference. |
Pixel Density (PPI) | 407 | 400 | Very similar sharpness; no visible difference in normal usage. |
Technology | AMOLED | PLS LCD | A52 5G's AMOLED provides deeper blacks, higher contrast, more vibrant colors, and better power efficiency with dark themes. |
Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Both offer smooth scrolling and animations. |
Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Brightness information is unavailable, this limits comparison on outdoor visibility. |
Performance | |||
Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G (8nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) | A23 5G's newer chip has a small edge in efficiency and performance. |
AnTuTu Score | 384,853 | 418,000 | A23 5G shows slightly better performance in benchmarks, however, real world differences are likely to be minor for everyday tasks |
GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 | Identical graphics performance. |
Battery | |||
Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | A23 5G offers longer battery life for a full day's use with moderate usage. |
Charging | 25W fast charging, Li-Polymer | 25W fast charging, Li-Ion | Both phones support similar charging speeds; Li-Polymer in A52 5G is typically a bit more durable over time. |
Features | Non-removable, QC2.0 and AFC. | Bypass Charging, Non-removable | A52 5G: QC2.0, AFC charging; A23 5G: Bypass charging during gaming, potentially extending battery life over time . |
Camera | |||
Main Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7", Sony IMX682 | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76", Samsung S5KJN1 | A52 5G has better detail and low-light performance due to larger sensor and higher resolution. |
Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8", Sony IMX616 | 8MP, f/2.0 | A52 5G captures significantly sharper and more detailed selfies; A23 5G offers slightly better low light performance due to the wider aperture. |
Wide Angle | 13MP, f/2.2, 1/3.1", Samsung S5K3L6 | 5MP, f/2.2 | A52 5G's wide angle camera captures significantly more detail. |
Portrait (Depth) | 5MP, f/2.4 | 2MP, f/2.4 | A52 5G offers slightly better depth estimation for portraits. |
Macro | 5MP, f/2.4 | 2MP, f/2.4 | A52 5G's macro camera captures slightly higher detail. |
Video Recording | Up to 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps with EIS | 1080p@30fps | A52 5G records sharper, more detailed videos with 4K support and 60fps; Better for content creators |
Features | 4K Video, OIS, EIS, Night Mode, etc. | OIS, PDAF, etc. | A52 5G includes 4K video recording and night mode; A23 5G includes Phase Detection Autofocus. |
Software | |||
OS | Android 11 (upgradable to 14) | Android 12 (upgradable to 14) | A23 5G has a slightly newer starting OS, but both get the same maximum OS version support. |
Connectivity | |||
Wifi | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Dual band, Wi-Fi Hotspot, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Display | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Hotspot, Wi-Fi Direct | A52 5G supports Wi-Fi Display to mirror the screen wirelessly. |
Bluetooth | 5.0 LE, A2DP, EDR, HID, LE, ANT+ | 5.1 LE, A2DP, AVRCP, DIP, HFP, HID, HSP, LE, PAN, OPP, PBAP/PAB, HOGP, APT-x | A23 5G has a newer Bluetooth version with additional features, which might lead to better compatibility. |
GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | A23 5G has QZSS for better location accuracy. |
SIM | Dual SIM, Dual Standby | Single SIM | A52 5G offers Dual Sim support. |
Storage | |||
Internal | 128 GB or 256 GB | - | A52 5G offers significantly more storage options. Note that the A23 5G storage options are not provided. |
RAM | 6 GB or 8 GB | - | A52 5G offers more RAM, helpful for multitasking. Note that the A23 5G RAM options are not provided. |
Expandable | No | No | Neither phone supports expandable storage. |
Audio | |||
Quality | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus | Basic Audio Features | A52 5G's sound is better due to Dolby audio. |
Security | |||
Features | Basic fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | A23 5G's side-mounted fingerprint is faster and more convenient. |
Build Quality | |||
Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Both have the same protection. |
Sensors | |||
Sensors | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope | Fingerprint, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Barometer, Ultrasonic proximity virtual | A23 5G has barometer and ultrasonic proximity sensor. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Advantages:
- Superior Display: AMOLED screen offers significantly better visual quality with higher contrast and vibrant colors compared to the A23 5G's PLS LCD.
- Better Camera System: Higher resolution main, selfie, and wide-angle cameras capture significantly more detailed images. 4K video recording is a major plus for content creators.
- Enhanced Audio: Dolby Atmos and Dolby Digital Plus offer a better audio experience.
- Dual SIM: Allows for two SIM cards.
- More Storage and RAM Options: Comes with more storage and RAM options.
Practical Implications: The A52 5G excels in media consumption, content creation, and anyone who values a better viewing experience and picture quality.
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Advantages:
- Newer Chipset: The Snapdragon 695 offers slightly better performance and power efficiency.
- Larger Battery: 5000mAh battery provides longer battery life, which is important for users who are away from chargers for long periods.
- Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor: More convenient and quicker unlock experience.
- More Advanced Bluetooth: Bluetooth 5.1 with additional profiles can offer greater connectivity.
- Newer OS: Starts with Android 12
- More Sensors: Includes a barometer and ultrasonic proximity sensor.
Practical Implications: The A23 5G is better for users who prioritize longer battery life and performance in daily tasks, with a slightly more modern design.
Significant Trade-offs:
- A52 5G sacrifices battery life and a slightly newer chipset for a better display and camera.
- A23 5G provides longer battery life and a newer chipset, but with a lower quality display and camera system.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is ideal for:
- Media Enthusiasts: Users who frequently watch videos, movies, or play graphic-intensive games will appreciate the superior AMOLED display.
- Photography Lovers: Those who prioritize camera quality, especially for selfies and videos, will find the A52 5G's cameras far superior.
- Content Creators: Users who need high-resolution video recording will find the 4K capability and better front camera on the A52 5G advantageous.
- Multi-Taskers: Users who want dual SIM capabilities and the option for larger RAM.
- Users who prioritize audio: The Dolby Atmos and Digital Plus make it better for listening to music and videos.
Specific Use Cases:
* Watching HD movies and shows.
* Taking detailed photos for social media.
* Recording high-resolution videos for vlogging or personal memories.
* Playing visually rich games.
* Frequent travelers who want the convenience of dual SIM capabilities
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G is ideal for:
- Budget-Conscious Users: Those looking for a phone with good battery life and decent performance, who may not need the best display or camera.
- Everyday Users: Users who prioritize long battery life and a smoother experience in general tasks.
- Users who value newer technology: Those who prefer slightly newer technology, a more modern fingerprint reader, and better Bluetooth compatibility, though with slight compromises.
- Users wanting the latest OS: Those wanting a newer starting Android OS version, which may receive longer update support.
- Users wanting extra sensors: Those who want the barometer sensor and a virtual proximity sensor.
Specific Use Cases:
* Casual browsing, social media use, and messaging.
* Long days away from a power source.
* Those who are looking for a budget friendly option.
* Gaming when power is not available.
* Wanting a newer device with potentially longer update support.
Price-to-Value Ratio:
- The A52 5G might be a better value if camera, display and sound quality are top priorities.
- The A23 5G provides better value for users who prioritize battery life, everyday performance and a slightly more modern design.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- How important is display quality for your use? (Are you a heavy video consumer?)
- How much do you prioritize camera quality, especially for selfies and videos?
- Is battery life or performance more crucial for your daily usage?
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Frequent traveler and content creator: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G due to better camera quality and dual SIM.
- Scenario 2: Budget-conscious student who needs long battery life: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G for its longer battery and slightly lower price.
- Scenario 3: Daily user who wants the best media experience: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G for its superior display and audio.
- Scenario 4: Casual smartphone user wanting better performance: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G for better efficiency and a side-mounted fingerprint scanner.
My Choice
If I had to choose between these two phones, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G.
Reasoning:
While the A23 5G offers a slightly newer chipset, longer battery life, and a more convenient fingerprint sensor, the superior AMOLED display, significantly better camera system (especially for selfies and videos), and enhanced audio of the A52 5G are more important to me personally. As someone who uses their phone for media consumption, content creation, and takes many photos, these are the areas where the A52 5G provides a noticeably better user experience, which is more important than a small increase in battery or benchmark performance. The availability of more RAM is also a benefit for multitasking, and dual SIM functionality would be useful in my daily life.