1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Nokia G60 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm | 166 × 75.9 × 8.6 mm | Nokia G60 is slightly taller and thicker, might feel less pocketable for some. |
| Weight | 189g | 190g | Virtually identical weight; negligible difference in hand. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.5" | 6.58" | Negligible size difference; both offer similar viewing experiences. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2408 | Very similar sharpness; no practical difference in clarity. |
| PPI | 407 | 401 | Very similar pixel density; both screens look equally sharp. |
| Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | AMOLED offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors, better viewing experience especially in dark. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Both offer smooth scrolling and animations, ideal for gaming. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Unable to assess brightness; both have identical unknown values. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G (8 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6 nm) | Snapdragon 695 in Nokia G60 has a slight edge in efficiency due to the smaller node size, but in general use both will perform comparably. |
| AnTuTu Score | 384,853 | 410,072 | Nokia G60 has a marginally higher benchmark score suggesting slightly better performance. |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 | Identical graphics performance; similar gaming experience. |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7", 0.8µm | 50MP, f/1.8, 0.7µm | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has higher resolution sensor, potentially more detailed images. |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 8MP, f/2.0, 0.64µm | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has significantly higher resolution selfies, and the Nokia G60 has a slightly wider aperture to capture a bit more light. |
| Wide Angle | 13MP, f/2.2, 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 5MP, f/2.0, unknown µm | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G offers higher resolution ultra-wide images, Nokia has slightly wider aperture. |
| Depth Sensor | 5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm | 2MP, f/2.4, unknown µm | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G depth sensor has more resolution |
| Macro Lens | 5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm | None | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a dedicated macro lens for close-up photography. |
| Video | 4K@30fps with EIS, 1080p@60fps with EIS | 1080p@30fps | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has 4K recording capabilities, better for higher quality videos. Samsung has EIS for video stability. |
| Features | OIS, Quad camera, more comprehensive options | Triple camera, CDAF, continous shooting | Samsung has OIS to help with stability in low light while Nokia has CDAF for focus. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 4500mAh | Both offer similar battery life, expected to last a full day with typical use. |
| Charging | 25W Fast Charging | 20W Fast Charging | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G charges slightly faster (25W), meaning less time plugged in. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (upgradable to 14) | Android 12 | Nokia G60 has a newer OS out of the box, but Samsung has the ability to update to 14. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 | Nokia G60 has newer Wi-Fi standard (Wi-Fi 6), offering faster speeds on compatible networks. |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.1 | Nokia G60 has a newer Bluetooth version with aptX/LDAC support for high quality audio. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | Nokia G60 offers wider satellite support, potentially better accuracy and faster locking. |
| SIM | Dual Nano SIM | Dual Nano SIM + eSIM | Nokia G60 offers eSIM support for easier switching between carriers. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 128/256GB | 64/128GB | Samsung has a larger storage option at 256 GB |
| RAM | 6/8GB | 4/6GB | Samsung offers more RAM, which is better for heavy users and gaming. |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither device provides expandable storage. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus | Basic | Samsung has enhanced spatial audio and surround sound features |
| Security | |||
| Features | Basic fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Nokia G60 offers a more modern side-mounted fingerprint sensor. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Protection | Gorilla Glass 5 | Gorilla Glass 5 | Both phones use the same screen protection technology. |
| Sensors | Biometric: Fingerprint, Proximity, Motion: Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Hall, Geomagnetic | Biometric: Fingerprint, Proximity, Motion: Accelerometer, Gyroscope | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has additional sensors (Hall, Geomagnetic) that might be useful for certain apps or features. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Advantages:
- Superior Display: AMOLED display offers significantly better contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors compared to the IPS LCD on the Nokia G60.
- Better Cameras: Higher resolution main, ultrawide and selfie cameras, along with the inclusion of a dedicated macro lens, provide more versatile photography capabilities.
- Faster Charging: 25W fast charging compared to 20W on Nokia G60.
- More RAM Option: Offers an 8GB RAM option for smoother multitasking, compared to Nokia's 6GB maximum.
- Enhanced Audio: Includes Dolby Atmos and Dolby Digital Plus for better audio quality.
- More Comprehensive Sensor Suite: Features Hall and Geomagnetic sensors, useful for gaming or other features.
Nokia G60 Advantages:
- Newer Chipset: Snapdragon 695 is more efficient (6 nm process), however the real world impact is small.
- Newer OS: Ships with Android 12 out of the box.
- Faster Wi-Fi: Wi-Fi 6 for faster and more reliable wireless connections, especially in crowded areas.
- Newer Bluetooth: Bluetooth 5.1 with aptX and LDAC for better audio quality over wireless headphones.
- eSIM Support: Supports eSIM for easier switching between carriers.
- Side-mounted fingerprint sensor: More ergonomic and modern fingerprint sensor.
- More satellite support: Support for QZSS gives better GPS accuracy.
Trade-offs:
- Samsung A52 5G sacrifices some connectivity and efficiency for a superior display, better camera system, and enhanced audio.
- Nokia G60 trades display quality for a more modern OS and connectivity features, better GPS and efficient chipset.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Ideal User:
- Multimedia Enthusiast: Users who consume a lot of videos, movies, or games and value a vibrant display with excellent contrast and color accuracy.
- Photography Lovers: Users who want a versatile camera system with high-resolution sensors, a dedicated macro lens, and video capabilities including 4k recording and video stability.
- Users who value sound: Those who appreciate enhanced audio with Dolby Atmos support will find it useful.
- Moderate Gamers: Users who prefer higher RAM options and an all round experience.
Nokia G60 Ideal User:
- Connectivity focused users: Users who want the latest Wi-Fi and Bluetooth standards, and GPS accuracy along with support for eSIM.
- Efficiency Seekers: Users who prioritize battery efficiency from their phone, along with a recent version of Android.
- Practical users: Users that appreciate a side-mounted fingerprint sensor.
- Budget-conscious users: Users who are fine with a mid range display and a smaller set of camera options.
Use Cases:
- Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: Watching movies, capturing high-quality photos and videos, playing games with smooth graphics, enjoying immersive audio and a rich all round experience.
- Nokia G60: Streaming media over Wi-Fi 6, listening to music with high-quality Bluetooth audio, travel, using it in areas that need better GPS, those who prioritize the latest Android OS.
Price-to-Value Ratio:
The price-to-value ratio is dependent on the current pricing of each device. Consider the price against the needs of the user profile. The Samsung offers better multimedia, but the Nokia offers better connectivity and a more recent OS.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- What is more important for you: display quality or the latest in connectivity and OS? (Samsung for the former, Nokia for the latter)
- Do you prioritize camera capabilities and more versatile options? (Samsung has a much more versatile camera system)
- Are you heavy user for performance? (Samsung offers a better RAM option to help with heavy use).
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: You watch a lot of movies/videos on your phone and enjoy photography.
- Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A52 5G for superior display and a more versatile camera.
- Scenario 2: You value fast and reliable Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity, and want the latest Android OS.
- Recommendation: Nokia G60 for the newer Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, OS and practical fingerprint sensor.
- Scenario 3: You are on a budget, want the basics for a phone with a decent display and camera, and want a more recent OS.
- Recommendation: Nokia G60 for the cheaper cost while still being an all round phone.
My Choice
I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G.
Reasoning:
My primary use case revolves around media consumption, especially video, and I value a vibrant display with great contrast and color accuracy. The AMOLED panel on the A52 5G is significantly superior for this purpose. Additionally, I often use my phone to capture photos and videos, and the versatility offered by the A52 5G's camera system, including its main sensor, wide angle lens, and the dedicated macro lens, is very appealing to me. While the Nokia G60 has newer connectivity features and a more recent OS, the core multimedia experience of the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G aligns better with my priorities. The superior audio features and options for more RAM also tip the scale. While the Nokia G60 has its merits, the areas where the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G excels align perfectly with my needs.
