1. Specifications Comparison
Design & Build
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Motorola Razr 50 | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Form Factor | Standard | Foldable | Motorola Razr 50 offers a unique, pocketable design when folded, while Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a traditional slab phone. |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm | 171.3 x 74 x 7.3 mm | Motorola Razr 50 is taller and thinner; Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is slightly wider and thicker but more compact in overall volume. |
| Weight | 189g | 188.4g | Both phones are practically the same weight, so this won't be a deciding factor. |
| Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Motorola Razr 50 has superior scratch and shatter resistance for increased durability. |
Display
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Motorola Razr 50 | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Size | 6.5" | 6.9" | Motorola Razr 50 has a larger screen for more immersive media consumption and multitasking. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2640 | Motorola Razr 50 has slightly more detail, but the difference is likely not very noticeable in everyday use. |
| Pixel Density | 407 PPI | 413 PPI | Both phones have very sharp screens; differences are negligible. |
| Technology | AMOLED | (Unknown) | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G offers superior display technology with better contrast, deep blacks, and vibrant colors. Lack of this information for the Razr is a disadvantage. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Both phones offer smooth scrolling and animations. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 3000 nits | Motorola Razr 50 has drastically better outdoor visibility in bright sunlight. |
Performance
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Motorola Razr 50 | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G (8nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7300X (4nm) | Motorola Razr 50 has a newer, more efficient chipset, leading to better performance and battery life. |
| AnTuTu Score | 384,853 | 620,395 | Motorola Razr 50 is significantly faster, offering a smoother experience in all tasks, including gaming. |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G615 MC2 | Motorola Razr 50 offers better graphics performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. |
Camera
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Motorola Razr 50 | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Main Camera Resolution | 64MP | 50MP | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures more detailed images in good lighting. |
| Main Camera Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 | Both perform similarly in low light for their main cameras. |
| Main Camera Pixel Size | 0.80µm | 0.70µm | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G may have slightly better low-light performance due to larger pixels on the main sensor. |
| Selfie Camera Resolution | 32MP | 32MP | Both offer high-resolution selfies. |
| Selfie Camera Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures slightly brighter selfies in low light with its wider aperture. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 13MP, f/2.2 | 13MP, f/2.2 | Both offer a wide-angle perspective. |
| Additional Cameras | 5MP Depth, 5MP Macro | None | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G provides more shooting versatility with dedicated depth and macro lenses. |
| Video | 4K@30fps EIS | 4K@30fps EIS | Both offer similar video recording quality and stabilization. |
| Camera Features | Quadruple camera, OIS, Manual Mode, HDR | Dual camera, OIS, RAW, Night Vision | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has more diverse camera modes, while the Motorola Razr 50 has RAW support and Night Vision for advanced users. |
| DXOMark Score | Not tested | 92 | Motorola Razr 50 has a decent camera according to DXOMark tests. |
Battery
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Motorola Razr 50 | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Capacity | 4500 mAh | 4200 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G offers slightly longer battery life due to higher capacity. |
| Charging | 25W Fast Charging | 30W Fast Charging | Motorola Razr 50 charges slightly faster. |
| Features | QC2.0, AFC | Wireless 15W, Reverse Charging | Motorola Razr 50 provides convenient wireless and reverse charging capabilities, while Samsung Galaxy A52 5G relies on quick charge technology. |
Software & Connectivity
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Motorola Razr 50 | Practical Impact |
|---|
| OS | Android 11 (Upgradable to 14) | Android 14 | Motorola Razr 50 ships with a newer Android version. |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6E | Motorola Razr 50 offers faster and more reliable Wi-Fi speeds. |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.3 | Motorola Razr 50 has a newer Bluetooth standard. |
| SIM | Dual Nano SIM | Dual Nano SIM / eSIM | Motorola Razr 50 supports eSIM for flexibility. |
| Storage | 128GB/256GB | 256GB/512GB | Motorola Razr 50 offers more base storage and a higher max option. |
| RAM | 6GB/8GB | 8GB/12GB | Motorola Razr 50 has more RAM for better multitasking and app performance. |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phone allows for storage expansion. |
Other
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Motorola Razr 50 | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Audio | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 3 mics | Motorola Razr 50 offers a better overall audio experience with enhanced spatial audio and better voice capture. |
| Security | Basic fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Motorola Razr 50 offers a convenient side-mounted fingerprint reader. |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Hall, Geomagnetic, Proximity, Fingerprint | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Gravity, Proximity, Fingerprint | Both phones offer a full range of sensors for advanced features and gaming. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Advantages:
- More Traditional Design: A familiar slab design that some users might prefer over a foldable.
- AMOLED Display: Superior color quality and contrast.
- Versatile Camera System: Includes dedicated depth and macro lenses.
- Dolby Digital Plus: Enhanced audio output.
- Larger battery capacity: Slightly better battery life.
Motorola Razr 50 Advantages:
- Foldable Design: Unique, compact form factor for portability and a cool factor.
- Superior Performance: Faster chipset and significantly better benchmark scores.
- Brighter Display: Much better outdoor visibility with 3000 nits.
- Larger Display: More screen real estate for immersive media and gaming.
- Advanced Connectivity: Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3 for faster wireless speeds.
- More Storage and RAM: Higher base storage options and more RAM for better multitasking.
- Faster Charging: 30W fast charging and also 15W wireless.
- Better Audio: Stereo speakers for enhanced audio experience.
Trade-offs:
- Samsung A52 5G: Lower processing power and display quality compared to Motorola Razr 50, slightly larger size and weight.
- Motorola Razr 50: Less versatile camera system and slightly lower battery capacity than the A52 5G. Unknown AMOLED display quality, which is a significant disadvantage.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G:
- Ideal User: Someone who prefers a traditional, reliable smartphone with a high-quality AMOLED display and a versatile camera setup, and doesn't need the latest features
- Use Cases:
- Everyday use, media consumption, and social media.
- Users who take many different types of photos (close-ups, landscapes, portraits).
- Individuals looking for a dependable all-rounder smartphone with familiar features.
Motorola Razr 50:
- Ideal User: Tech enthusiasts, trendsetters, and power users who value innovative designs, high performance, and cutting-edge features.
- Use Cases:
- Demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, and heavy multitasking.
- Users who prioritize portability and want a phone that can easily fit in a pocket.
- Individuals who need excellent outdoor visibility in bright sunlight.
- Those who prefer wireless charging and reverse charging capabilities.
Price-to-Value:
The price of the Samsung A52 5G will likely be much lower than the new Razr 50 since it is an older model, making it the more affordable choice. The Razr 50 offers a unique experience, with top features that justifies a higher price point.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- Do you prioritize portability and a unique design over a traditional form factor? (Foldable vs Standard)
- Is high performance and cutting-edge technology more important than a diverse camera system and an AMOLED screen? (Performance vs Camera/Display).
- Is wireless charging and reverse charging necessary, or would quick wired charging be sufficient?
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Budget-Conscious User: If your budget is a major concern and you value a good all-round experience without focusing on cutting-edge features, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is the better choice.
- Scenario 2: Power User: If performance, speed, and battery life are the main focus, and you want the latest features, the Motorola Razr 50 is the clear winner.
- Scenario 3: Photo Enthusiast: The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a better option as it comes with better versatility thanks to a dedicated macro lens and depth lens and a slightly better camera in low light.
- Scenario 4: Trendsetter/Tech Enthusiast: If you value the newest, innovative design with a cutting-edge foldable form, then the Motorola Razr 50 is the better choice for you.
My Choice
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would pick the Motorola Razr 50. Despite its lack of AMOLED display details, the advantages in performance, screen brightness, faster charging, and a better audio system make it the superior choice. I value a device that offers excellent performance and innovative design, which outweighs the benefits of the Samsung's more versatile camera and better low light performance, and its older traditional design. The Razr's foldable form factor also adds a unique portability advantage, aligning with my preferences for cutting-edge technology.
