Smartphone Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs. Motorola Razr 40
1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Motorola Razr 40 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Form Factor | Standard | Foldable | Razr 40 offers a compact, pocketable design when folded and a larger screen when unfolded. A52 5G is a traditional slab phone. |
| Dimensions | 159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm | 170.8 × 74 × 7.4 mm | Razr 40 is taller and thinner when unfolded, A52 5G is wider and thicker; Folded Razr 40 will be significantly more compact than the A52 5G. |
| Weight | 189g | 188.6g | Both phones are virtually the same weight; Neither is excessively heavy. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.5" | 6.9" | Razr 40 has a noticeably larger screen, better for media consumption and multitasking. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2640 | Razr 40 has a slightly sharper display with slightly more pixels. |
| Pixel Density | 407 PPI | 413 PPI | Both displays are sharp; Differences are negligible for normal use. |
| Technology | AMOLED | Unspecified | A52 5G's AMOLED offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency for dark themes. Razr 40 display technology is not specified. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 144Hz | Razr 40 has a slightly smoother display during scrolling and animations. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 1400 nits | Razr 40 display is significantly brighter, making it more usable outdoors in bright conditions. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (8nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm) | Razr 40's newer chipset offers significantly better performance, including faster app loading and smoother multitasking. |
| AnTuTu Score | 384,853 | 699,600 | Razr 40 offers a substantially better performance, noticeably snappier user experience, smoother gaming. |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 644 | Razr 40's GPU provides better graphics performance for gaming and demanding apps. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 4200mAh | A52 5G has a slightly larger battery, potentially offering slightly longer battery life. |
| Charging | 25W | 33W | Razr 40 charges faster, reducing downtime. |
| Features | QC2.0, AFC | Reverse Charging, Wireless 8W | Razr 40 has wireless and reverse charging, making it more convenient. A52 5G has older fast charging standards. |
| Camera | |||
| Standard Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7", Sony IMX682 | 64MP, f/1.8, Unspecified Sensor | Both have similar standard camera specs; A52 5G sensor and pixel size are specified. |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8", Sony IMX616 | 32MP, f/2.45, Unspecified Sensor | A52 5G has a slightly wider aperture for potentially better low light selfies. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 13MP, f/2.2, 1/3.1", Samsung S5K3L6 | None | A52 5G offers a dedicated ultrawide camera for landscape or group shots. |
| Portrait Lens | 5MP, f/2.4 | None | A52 5G includes a depth sensor for portrait mode. |
| Macro Lens | 5MP, f/2.4 | None | A52 5G has a dedicated macro lens for close-up photos. |
| Wide Angle + Macro | None | 13MP, f/2.2 | Razr 40 includes ultrawide and macro on the same lens, offering flexibility. |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps w/ EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps w/ EIS | Both offer similar video recording capabilities. |
| Camera Features | Quadruple camera, OIS, Manual Focus, HDR, Night Mode | Dual camera, OIS, Phase Detection AF, Laser AF, RAW, Night Vision | Razr 40 offers advanced features like laser autofocus and RAW capture, while A52 5G offers quad-camera flexibility. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (upgradable to 14) | Android 13 (upgradable to 16) | Razr 40 has a newer OS, likely receiving more updates and features. |
| Connectivity | |||
| WiFi | 802.11ac | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) | Razr 40 has newer Wi-Fi standard for better performance on compatible networks. |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.3 | Razr 40 has newer Bluetooth, potentially better connection and features |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, Galileo | Both phones offer similar location capabilities with Razr 40 adding SUPL. |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano) | Dual SIM (Nano/eSIM) | Razr 40 offers eSIM for more flexible carrier usage. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 128GB or 256GB | 128GB or 256GB | Both phones offer the same storage options. |
| RAM | 6GB or 8GB | 8GB or 12GB | Razr 40 has more RAM, better for multitasking and resource-heavy applications. |
| Expandable | No | No | Neither phone supports external storage. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 3 microphones | Razr 40 offers stereo speakers and multi-microphone array for better audio experience. |
| Security | |||
| Features | Basic Fingerprint | Side-Mounted Fingerprint | Razr 40 has a faster and more conveniently located fingerprint sensor. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Razr 40 uses a significantly more durable screen protection. |
| Sensors | |||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Hall, Geomagnetic, Proximity, Fingerprint | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Gravity, Proximity, Fingerprint | Both have a good sensor suite; Razr 40 has a compass for navigation. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Motorola Razr 40 Advantages:
- Foldable Design: Significantly more compact when folded, offering a unique form factor and portability. It unfolds into a large screen for better media and productivity.
- Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 chipset and higher AnTuTu score translates to significantly better performance, faster app loading, and smoother multitasking.
- Brighter Display: With a peak brightness of 1400 nits, the Razr 40 is much more visible in bright sunlight.
- Faster Charging: 33W fast charging is faster than the A52 5G's 25W charging, reducing downtime.
- Advanced Camera Features: Features like Phase Detection AF, Laser AF, RAW capture, and Night Vision provide more photography control.
- Stereo Speakers & Improved Audio: Provides a better audio experience with stereo speakers, multi-microphone array.
- More RAM: Offering up to 12GB of RAM, allowing for better multitasking
- Newer Software: Android 13, with guaranteed upgrades to 16
- eSIM Support: Greater flexibility in carrier usage through eSIM support.
- Better Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus provides superior scratch and drop resistance.
- Newer Bluetooth Standard Bluetooth 5.3
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Advantages:
- AMOLED Display: Offers superior contrast, deeper blacks and better power efficiency on dark themes.
- Dedicated Camera Lenses: Features a dedicated wide-angle lens, macro lens, and depth sensor for more versatile photography.
- Larger Battery: Slightly larger battery capacity, potentially offering slightly better battery life.
- Wider aperture on the selfie camera: Better low light selfies.
- Lower Price: Typically found at a lower price point than the foldable Razr 40.
Significant Trade-offs:
- Razr 40's Foldable Design: While a benefit, the hinge mechanism could be a potential point of failure. The design may also come with a higher cost.
- A52 5G's Lower Performance: The older chipset and lower AnTuTu score mean the A52 5G is not as fast or responsive as the Razr 40.
- A52 5G's Older Software: Ships with an older version of Android (11), which will receive fewer upgrades.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Ideal User:
- Users who prioritize a traditional smartphone experience with a reliable AMOLED display.
- Those who value versatile camera capabilities with dedicated lenses for different scenarios.
- Price-conscious buyers looking for a mid-range phone with a good feature set.
- Users who don't require top-tier processing power and are mainly using their phones for browsing, social media, and basic photography.
- Users comfortable with a phone that doesn't have top tier performance.
Use Cases for A52 5G:
- Everyday social media browsing and communication.
- Casual photography with diverse lens options.
- Watching videos and streaming content on a high-quality AMOLED display.
- Moderate gaming.
- Users who prioritize the versatility of a quad-camera setup.
Motorola Razr 40 Ideal User:
- Tech enthusiasts seeking a unique and modern foldable design.
- Users who prioritize portability and a large screen experience.
- Those who require top-tier performance for demanding apps and games.
- Users who want a smartphone with a premium feel and advanced features.
- Users who want a better audio experience through speakers and multi-microphone array.
- Users who want advanced photography control with RAW capture and laser AF
- Users who need wireless and reverse charging.
- Users who want more guaranteed software updates.
Use Cases for Razr 40:
- Heavy multitasking and gaming.
- Enjoying multimedia content on a large, high-brightness screen.
- Frequent travelers who value the compact size of a foldable phone.
- Capturing high-quality photos with advanced control options.
- Those seeking a unique and stylish device.
- Those seeking better connectivity with a modern wifi and bluetooth standard
- Users who prioritize the versatility of a compact form factor and large screen size
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- Form Factor: Is a foldable, pocketable design important to you, or do you prefer the traditional slab design?
- Performance Needs: Do you require top-tier processing power for gaming and demanding applications, or is a smoother everyday experience enough?
- Budget: Are you willing to pay a premium for the foldable form factor and better performance of the Razr 40, or would you prefer a more affordable mid-range option?
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
For Budget-Conscious Users: The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G offers a reliable experience with a versatile camera setup and AMOLED display at a lower price point. It's suitable for casual users.
For Performance & Tech Enthusiasts: The Motorola Razr 40 is ideal with its foldable design, superior performance, brighter display, and advanced features. This phone caters to users seeking a premium and unique experience.
For Users Prioritizing Camera Versatility: The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G edges out, with more dedicated lenses for different types of photography.
For Users Prioritizing Media Consumption: The Motorola Razr 40 with its larger, brighter display and stereo speakers.
My Choice:
Personally, I would choose the Motorola Razr 40. Here's why:
While the Samsung A52 5G offers great value for money, the Razr 40 is in a different league. Its newer chipset means it's significantly faster and smoother, something I value heavily. I also find the foldable form factor intriguing, combining portability with a larger screen when needed. The brighter display is a big plus for outdoor visibility, and I value the wireless charging and more advanced camera features. While it's more expensive, the performance and modern features of the Razr 40 justify the cost for me. I'm also more interested in modern features like the advanced audio setup, eSIM support, and better screen protection.
