Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Motorola Moto G85 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 100.87 cm³ 89.95 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.9 "/g
Weight 189 g 171 g
Height 159.9 mm 161.9 mm
Width 75.1 mm 73.1 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • Cobalt Blue
  • Olive Green
  • Urban Grey
  • Magenta

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 407 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 106.51 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.61 mAh/cm³ 55.59 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52 5GMotorola Moto G85Practical Impact
Dimensions159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm161.9 × 73.1 × 7.6 mmMoto G85 is slightly taller and thinner, while A52 5G is wider and thicker. The Moto G85 is more pocketable and comfortable.
Weight189g171gMoto G85 is lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use.

Display

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52 5GMotorola Moto G85Practical Impact
Size6.5"6.67"Moto G85 has a slightly larger display, offering a more immersive viewing experience for media and gaming.
Resolution1080x24001080x2400Both have identical resolutions. Sharpness will be very similar.
PPI407395Both have similar pixel density, resulting in comparable clarity and sharpness.
TechnologyAMOLEDP-OLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. The differences are not significant for the average user.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer a smooth scrolling experience and better gaming performance.
Brightness0 nits1600 nitsMoto G85 has significantly higher peak brightness, making it much more readable under bright sunlight.

Performance

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52 5GMotorola Moto G85Practical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm)Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6 nm)Moto G85 has a newer, more efficient chipset which may translate to better performance and battery life.
Antutu Score384,853475,000Moto G85 benchmarks higher, suggesting better overall performance for apps and gaming.
GPUAdreno 619Adreno 619Both have similar graphics processing capabilities for gaming.

Camera

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52 5GMotorola Moto G85Practical Impact
Main Camera Resolution64MP50MPA52 5G captures slightly more detailed images in good lighting conditions.
Main Camera Aperturef/1.8f/1.79Moto G85 captures slightly brighter images in low-light environments.
Main Camera Sensor Size1/1.7"1/2"A52 5G has a larger sensor, which generally translates to better light gathering and image quality
Selfie Camera Resolution32MP32MPBoth offer similar selfie detail.
Selfie Camera Aperturef/2.2f/2.4A52 5G has a slightly wider aperture for brighter selfies in lower light.
Wide Angle Camera Resolution13MP8MPA52 5G captures wider shots with higher detail
Portrait (Depth) Camera5MPNoneA52 5G has a dedicated depth sensor for better portrait mode shots.
Macro Lens5MPNoneA52 5G can capture close-up photos, which Moto G85 cannot.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@30fps with EISUp to 1080p@60fpsA52 5G offers higher resolution video recording for better quality.
Slow-Motion120fps30fpsA52 5G offers higher slow-motion capabilities.
Camera Features4K Video, Quadruple camera, Ultra stable video, Manual focus, Night ModeDual camera, Phase detection autofocus (PDAF), Laser autofocus (LAF), Continuous shooting, RAWA52 5G has a more versatile camera system with more shooting modes. Moto G85 has faster focusing and RAW capture capabilities.
DxOMark ScoreNot AvailableMobile: 88 (Photo: 83, Video: 109)Moto G85 has a reasonably good camera according to DxOMark, where A52 5G has no score.

Battery

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A52 5GMotorola Moto G85Practical Impact
Capacity4500mAh5000mAhMoto G85 has a larger battery, likely providing longer battery life.
Charging25W fast charging30W fast chargingMoto G85 charges faster, reducing downtime.
FeaturesQC2.0 and AFC.NoneA52 5G offers a more flexible charging system.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Advantages:

  • More versatile camera system: Features a quad-camera setup with dedicated macro and depth sensors, offering more creative flexibility.
  • 4K Video Recording: Supports higher resolution video for better quality and editing capabilities.
  • Wider Aperture Front Camera: Better low-light selfies.
  • More Flexible Charging: Supports Quick Charge 2.0 and Adaptive Fast Charging

Practical Implications: The A52 5G is a better choice for users who prioritize camera versatility and high-quality video recording, as well as having more flexibility with charging.

Motorola Moto G85 Advantages:

  • Higher Peak Brightness: Significantly better display visibility in bright sunlight.
  • Better Performance: A newer chipset and higher AnTuTu score for smoother day to day and slightly more responsive gaming.
  • Lighter and Thinner Design: More comfortable to hold for longer periods of time and more pocketable.
  • Larger Battery and Faster Charging: Longer battery life and quicker recharge times, which may be ideal for heavy usage or travel.
  • Newer Bluetooth and WiFi: Better wireless standards.

Practical Implications: The Moto G85 is better for users who value outdoor visibility, performance, battery life, and convenience, and are not as concerned with camera versatility.

Significant Trade-Offs:

  • A52 5G gives a more versatile camera system but is less ergonomic and has less battery and performance.
  • Moto G85 has a more efficient chipset and a better screen, but lacks the extra camera features.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Ideal User:

  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who enjoy experimenting with different camera modes (macro, depth) and shooting 4K videos.
  • Social Media Content Creators: Those who value a versatile camera for both photos and videos.
  • Users who value flexibility with charging: Users who would prefer more supported charging standards.

Specific Use Cases:

  • Capturing detailed close-up shots of objects or nature using the macro lens.
  • Recording high-resolution videos for vlogging or social media.
  • Taking portrait shots with a dedicated depth sensor.

Motorola Moto G85 Ideal User:

  • Outdoor Users: Individuals who frequently use their phone in bright daylight and need a very readable screen.
  • Power Users: Those who need a device with long battery life for all-day use and fast charging.
  • Gamers and Multitaskers: Users who want a more responsive device for demanding games and apps.
  • Users who value the latest tech: Users who want the latest Bluetooth and WiFi standards.

Specific Use Cases:

  • Using GPS for navigation under sunlight conditions.
  • Playing games or using demanding apps while traveling.
  • Long commutes or travel where battery life is a priority.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The A52 5G is older, and its price has come down significantly making it a budget option. However, it is not a good value in 2024 when compared to the Moto G85.
  • The Moto G85 is likely to be in the mid-range category and delivers exceptional value and all round performance when compared to the A52 5G.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is camera versatility to you? (Do you need macro/depth sensors and 4K video?)
  2. How important is outdoor visibility? (Will you use the phone under bright sunlight?)
  3. How important is battery life and charging speed? (Do you need all-day battery and quick recharge?)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Casual User: If you mostly browse the web, use social media, and occasionally take pictures, the Motorola Moto G85 is the better choice due to its better display, performance, and battery.
  • Scenario 2: Photography Enthusiast: If you need a versatile camera system for different photography types, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is the better choice for photography, but you may want to consider other modern options for better performance.
  • Scenario 3: Outdoor User: If you spend a lot of time outdoors, the Motorola Moto G85 is a better choice due to its higher peak brightness.
  • Scenario 4: Mobile Gamer: If you play games on your phone, the Motorola Moto G85 is the better choice because of its higher performance.

My Choice

If I had to choose, I would pick the Motorola Moto G85. While the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a more versatile camera on paper, the significantly better display brightness, superior performance, increased battery, and faster charging of the Moto G85 are more compelling for my daily use. I often use my phone outdoors, and the higher brightness display is a must. Additionally, the improvements in overall performance and battery life make the Moto G85 a more practical and modern choice in 2024. While I do value a good camera, I am not a professional photographer, and the main camera on the Moto G85 is sufficient for my needs, and the convenience of a more ergonomic device is a more important consideration for me than the macro and depth sensors. Therefore, I would take the better all-round performance and usability of the Moto G85 over the A52 5G.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.