1. Specifications Comparison
Here's a breakdown of the key specifications of the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and Motorola Moto G72, along with the practical implications of their differences:
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Motorola Moto G72 | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Design | |||
Dimensions | 159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm | 160.5 × 74.4 × 7.9 mm | Moto G72 is slightly thinner and narrower, potentially more comfortable for one-handed use, while the A52 5G is a bit bulkier. |
Weight | 189g | 166g | Moto G72 is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use and portability. |
Display | |||
Size | 6.5" | 6.6" | Very similar screen sizes; the 0.1" difference is unlikely to be noticeable during everyday use. |
Resolution | 1080 x 2400 | 1080 x 2400 | Both phones have identical sharp displays, resulting in similar visual clarity. |
Pixel Density (PPI) | 407 | 402 | Practically identical sharpness; both screens look very crisp to the naked eye. |
Technology | AMOLED | P-OLED | Both use high-quality OLED panels, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. Subtle differences in color accuracy or viewing angles may exist, but are likely minor. |
Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Both offer smooth scrolling and animations, enhancing the user experience during gaming and general navigation. |
Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Both phones have the same peak brightness. Unable to determine screen's visibility in direct sunlight or HDR capabilities as a result. |
Performance | |||
Chipset | Snapdragon 750G (8 nm) | Helio G99 (6 nm) | Moto G72's newer chipset offers marginally better performance and efficiency due to the smaller manufacturing process. |
AnTuTu Score | 384,853 | 415,300 | Moto G72 offers slightly better overall performance, but the difference in real-world usage may not always be noticeable for all users. |
GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 | Different GPUs mean different strengths in graphics processing, but overall gaming performance is comparable with Moto G72 slightly ahead. |
Battery | |||
Capacity | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh | Moto G72 has a larger battery, likely resulting in longer battery life between charges. |
Charging | 25W Fast Charging | 33W Fast Charging | Moto G72 charges faster, reducing downtime when topping up the battery. |
Battery Type | Li-Polymer | Li-Ion | Both types of batteries are safe and commonly used in smartphones, and difference is negligible. |
Camera | |||
Main Camera | 64MP, f/1.8 | 108MP, f/1.7 | Moto G72 captures more detail due to its higher resolution and performs slightly better in low-light thanks to the wider aperture. |
Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.2 | 16MP | A52 5G offers higher resolution selfies, likely resulting in more detailed photos. |
Ultrawide Camera | 13MP, f/2.2 | 8MP, f/1.9 | A52 5G captures more detail in ultrawide shots, but Moto G72 may perform marginally better in low light due to the wider aperture. |
Portrait (Depth) Camera | 5MP, f/2.4 | N/A | A52 5G has a dedicated depth sensor, which improves bokeh effect (background blur) in portrait photos. |
Macro Camera | 5MP, f/2.4 | 2MP, f/2.4 | A52 5G captures more detailed macro photos due to higher resolution. |
Video Recording | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, EIS | 1080p@30/60fps | A52 5G captures higher quality video (4K) and has EIS for smoother footage. Moto G72 has a basic 1080p cap and digital stabilization only. |
Software | |||
OS | Android 11 (Upgradable to 14) | Android 12 | Moto G72 comes with a newer version of Android out of the box, but the A52 5G can be upgraded to Android 14. |
Connectivity | |||
Wi-Fi | 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Both support similar Wi-Fi standards, offering comparable wireless network performance. |
Bluetooth | 5.0, LE, A2DP, EDR, HID, ANT+ | 5.0, LE, A2DP | A52 5G offers more Bluetooth features for better device connection. |
GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, Galileo | Both provide reliable GPS navigation; Moto G72 has SUPL for assisted GPS data for quicker location lock. |
Storage | |||
Internal | 128GB/256GB | 128GB/256GB | Both offer similar storage options, ensuring enough space for apps, photos, and media. |
RAM | 6GB/8GB | 6GB/8GB | Both provide adequate RAM for smooth multitasking. |
Expandable | No | No | Neither phone allows for additional storage via microSD cards. |
Audio | |||
Quality | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | Both support Dolby Atmos for immersive audio. Moto G72 has stereo speakers for a better experience. Samsung offers Dolby Digital Plus. |
Security | |||
Biometric | Fingerprint Sensor | Fingerprint Sensor | Both phones offer basic fingerprint security. |
Build Quality | |||
Screen Protection | Gorilla Glass 5 | Unknown | Samsung A52 5G has Corning Gorilla Glass 5 which offers great durability. |
Sensors | |||
Sensors | Fingerprint; Proximity; Accelerometer, Gyroscope | Fingerprint; Proximity; Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Magnetometer | Both phones have important sensors for daily use. Motorola Moto G72 additionally features: Compass, Magnetometer. |
## 2. Key Differences Analysis |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Advantages:
- Better Video Recording: Supports 4K video recording and Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) for higher quality and more stable footage.
- Superior Selfie Camera: Higher resolution front-facing camera (32MP vs. 16MP) captures more detailed selfies.
- Depth Sensor: Dedicated depth sensor enhances portrait mode photos with better background blur.
- Optical Image Stabilization (OIS): Helps reduce blur and shake when taking photos.
- More Bluetooth features: A52 5G has a more comprehensive set of features for connecting to devices.
- Display Protection: Has Corning Gorilla Glass 5, offering better screen protection.
- Additional Sensors: Geomagnetic, Hall.
- Dolby Digital Plus: Offers a wider range of audio enhancements
Practical Implications: The A52 5G is better for users who prioritize high-quality video, detailed selfies, advanced photo features, and screen durability.
Motorola Moto G72 Advantages:
- Lighter and Thinner Design: More comfortable for prolonged use and carrying.
- Better Main Camera in Low-light: Wider aperture on the main camera may perform better in low-light conditions.
- Faster Charging: 33W fast charging refills the battery quicker than A52 5G's 25W.
- Larger Battery: 500mAh bigger battery offers longer battery life per charge.
- Slightly Better Performance: Newer chipset offers slightly improved performance.
- Stereo Speakers: Offers a more immersive audio experience.
- Additional Sensors: Compass, Magnetometer.
- Phase Detection and Laser autofocus (PDAF and LAF): Allows to focus better in low light situations, and provides a faster focus.
Practical Implications: The Moto G72 is better for users who need longer battery life, want a lighter phone, need faster charging, and prefer a slightly better performing phone for general use, and a more immersive audio experience.
Significant Trade-offs:
- A52 5G: Trades slightly heavier build for more advanced camera features, a more durable screen, and more robust video recording capabilities.
- Moto G72: Trades some camera features (like 4K and OIS) for a lighter build, better battery and faster charging.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G:
- Ideal Users: Content creators, social media enthusiasts, and users who value advanced photo and video quality.
- Use Cases:
- Filming videos in 4K resolution.
- Taking selfies frequently.
- Capturing high-detail photos in various conditions.
- Gaming.
- Users who want a durable screen.
- Price-to-Value: As an older model, the A52 5G might offer better value in certain markets if it is available at a lower price.
Motorola Moto G72:
- Ideal Users: Everyday users, those who value battery life, and people who prefer a lighter device.
- Use Cases:
- Long periods away from a charger.
- General daily tasks (browsing, social media, etc.)
- Listening to music and watching videos.
- Gaming
- Price-to-Value: The newer Moto G72 may be pricier than the A52 5G, but its more efficient chipset and faster charging could justify the cost for some.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions to Consider:
- Camera Needs: Do you prioritize high-resolution video (4K) and advanced photography features, or is a good main camera enough?
- Battery and Charging: Is longer battery life and faster charging more important to you than high-end camera capabilities?
- Ergonomics and Build: Do you prefer a lighter, more compact phone, or are you okay with a slightly heavier device with added features?
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
Scenario 1: Social Media Influencer/Content Creator:
- Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is the better choice due to its 4K video, higher-quality selfie camera, and additional camera features like OIS and a depth sensor.
Scenario 2: Power User (Heavy Usage All Day):
- Recommendation: Motorola Moto G72 is better due to its larger battery, faster charging, and lighter design for extended use.
Scenario 3: Average User/General Purpose:
- Recommendation: The choice between the two is a bit more difficult, the Moto G72 has a more modern processor and charging, but the Samsung A52 5G is still a good contender, and often sells for a lower price than the Moto G72.
What I Would Choose and Why
Personally, I would choose the Motorola Moto G72.
Here's why:
- Battery Life and Charging: As someone who uses their phone heavily throughout the day, the Moto G72's larger battery and faster charging are significant advantages, reducing battery anxiety.
- Comfort: The lighter and thinner design would make the Moto G72 more comfortable for extended use, especially during travel.
- Sufficient Performance: The Moto G72's chipset is efficient for everyday tasks and moderate gaming and offers better performance than the A52 5G. While the A52 5G has some camera features that are better, the Moto G72 has the basics covered.
- Stereo Speakers: As someone who enjoys consuming media, the stereo speakers offer a better experience than a mono setup.
While I appreciate the A52 5G's advanced camera capabilities, they don't outweigh the benefits I'd get from the Moto G72's lighter, more comfortable design, enhanced battery performance, and a more immersive audio experience. The slightly better benchmark scores for the Moto G72 further strengthen my choice as it indicates more processing power.