1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Motorola Moto G71 5G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm | 161.2 × 73.9 × 8.5 mm | Similar size; Moto G71 is slightly taller & narrower, A52 is wider. Minor differences in hand feel. |
| Weight | 189g | 179g | Moto G71 is slightly lighter; may be more comfortable for prolonged use. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.5" | 6.4" | Negligible size difference; both offer a comfortable viewing experience. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | Identical sharpness; both displays will look equally crisp. |
| PPI | 407 | 411 | Virtually identical pixel density; both displays will appear equally sharp |
| Technology | AMOLED | AMOLED | Vibrant colors and deep blacks on both; good for media consumption. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 60Hz | A52 offers smoother scrolling and animations; more fluid visual experience, especially for gaming. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Unknown peak brightness. Without nits data, can't assess visibility in bright sunlight. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Similar performance levels; 695 may have slightly better efficiency due to smaller manufacturing process. |
| AnTuTu Score | 384,853 | 396,564 | Nearly identical performance; both capable of handling everyday tasks and moderate gaming. |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 | Identical gaming performance capabilities. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | Moto G71 should offer longer battery life on a single charge; good for heavy users. |
| Charging | 25W fast charging | 33W fast charging | Moto G71 charges faster, reducing downtime. |
| Features | Non-removable, QC2.0 and AFC | Non-removable | A52 supports QC2.0 and AFC, which are older fast-charging protocols. |
| Camera | |||
| Rear Standard | 64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7", IMX682 | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76", S5KJN1 | A52 has higher resolution and a larger sensor; potentially better low-light performance and detail. |
| Front Selfie | 32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8", IMX616 | 16MP, f/2.2, Unknown | A52 captures more detailed selfies; G71 pixel size is slightly larger for better low-light. |
| Wide Angle | 13MP, f/2.2, 1/3.1", S5K3L6 | 8MP, f/2.2, Unknown | A52 takes wider and more detailed photos compared to Motorola's wide lens. |
| Portrait (Depth) | 5MP, f/2.4 | N/A | A52 is capable of capturing portrait mode with depth effect. |
| Macro | 5MP, f/2.4 | 2MP, f/2.4, Unknown | A52 captures more detailed macro shots. |
| Video | 4K@30fps with EIS, 1080p@60fps | 1080p@60fps | A52 can record higher-resolution videos; offering better video quality |
| Video Stabilization | Yes | No | A52 offers better quality and less shaky videos |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (upgradable to 14) | Android 11 (upgradable to 12) | A52 has a longer software support period. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Both support similar Wi-Fi standards, offering similar wireless speeds. |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 LE, EDR, HID, ANT+ | 5.0 LE | A52 offers more advanced Bluetooth features. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, Galileo | Similar location capabilities; Moto G71 offers SUPL for faster GPS lock. |
| SIM | Dual SIM Dual Standby | Dual SIM Dual Standby | Both support dual SIM functionality. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 128GB/256GB | 128GB | A52 can be purchased with 256GB of storage, which is better for people storing a lot of media. |
| RAM | 6GB/8GB | 6GB/8GB | Adequate RAM for multitasking on both phones. |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | Both lack expandable storage, which could be limiting for heavy media users. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus | Dolby Atmos, 2 microphones | A52 has slightly better spatial audio features. Moto has additional microphones. |
| Security | |||
| Features | basic fingerprint sensor | rear-mounted fingerprint sensor | Similar fingerprint security. |
| Build | |||
| Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Unknown | A52 has superior screen protection; more resistant to scratches and minor impacts. |
| Sensors | |||
| Sensors | Biometric, Proximity, Motion, Geomagnetic | Biometric, Proximity, Motion | A52 offers a more comprehensive sensor suite. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Advantages:
- Superior Display: 120Hz refresh rate offers much smoother animations, a significant advantage for gaming and general UI smoothness.
- Better Camera System: Higher resolution sensors (64MP main, 32MP front, 13MP wide) and a larger main sensor with OIS. Resulting in more detailed photos, better low-light performance, and more versatile photography. Additionally offers portrait and macro lens.
- 4K Video Recording: Records video at a higher resolution compared to Moto G71.
- Longer Software Support: Guaranteed Android OS updates up to Android 14 vs Android 12 for the Moto G71.
- Advanced Bluetooth: Supports EDR, HID, and ANT+, offering more connectivity options.
- Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 5 provides better scratch and impact resistance.
- Audio: Dolby Digital Plus for enhanced audio experience.
- Sensors: Geomagnetic sensor for more accurate orientation and compass features.
Motorola Moto G71 5G Advantages:
- Larger Battery: 5000mAh battery offers longer battery life.
- Faster Charging: 33W charging allows for quicker refills.
- Slightly Better Efficiency: Snapdragon 695 with 6nm architecture potentially more energy-efficient.
- Lighter: Slightly more comfortable for long periods of use because of lower weight.
- More microphones: Two microphones for better audio capture during calls and video recording.
- GPS: SUPL for faster GPS lock
Significant Trade-offs:
- A52: Less battery life, slower charging, lacks laser autofocus, and raw capture support.
- G71: Lower refresh rate display, less versatile camera system, fewer software updates, and lower video recording quality.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is Ideal For:
- Media Enthusiasts: Users who prioritize a smooth display for video streaming and gaming, along with a good camera system for social media content.
- Photography Lovers: Those who value high-resolution, detailed images, and a wide range of camera features, including 4K video and OIS.
- Users Who Want Longer Software Support: Users who want to keep their phone longer and want the latest software updates.
- Users who listen to music: Enhanced audio with Dolby Digital Plus.
Specific Use Cases:
- Social Media Content Creation: Higher-quality front and rear cameras for better image and video capture.
- Mobile Gaming: 120Hz refresh rate provides a smoother, more responsive gaming experience.
- Long-Term Use: Better software support for future updates and features.
Motorola Moto G71 5G is Ideal For:
- Battery Life Prioritizers: Users who need a long-lasting phone and prioritize battery life and fast charging for extended use.
- Budget-Conscious Buyers: Those who seek a balance of essential features with good performance at a lower price.
- Users who want a lightweight phone
Specific Use Cases:
- Travelers: Longer battery life and fast charging reduce the need to search for a power outlet.
- Heavy Phone Users: Those who use their phone frequently for calls, messages, social media browsing, and multimedia.
- Users who need faster GPS lock: SUPL for better location speed and accuracy.
Price-to-Value:
- The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G typically comes at a higher price point, reflecting its superior display and camera system.
- The Motorola Moto G71 5G offers a more affordable option with a focus on essential features, battery life, and faster charging.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- How important is a smooth display experience to you? (120Hz vs 60Hz)
- How much do you prioritize battery life vs. camera quality and features?
- How long do you plan to keep your phone before upgrading? (Software updates)
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Media & Photography Enthusiast: If you prioritize a smooth, high-quality display and a versatile camera system, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is the better choice despite the higher price.
- Scenario 2: Battery Life & Everyday Use: If long battery life and fast charging are more critical than top-tier cameras and display, the Motorola Moto G71 5G provides great value.
- Scenario 3: Long-Term User: If you want a phone that will stay up-to-date and continue to get new features, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a better option due to longer software support
My Choice
I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. While the Motorola G71 5G has some advantages like a larger battery and faster charging, the overall experience of the A52 5G is more appealing. The 120Hz display makes a huge difference in everyday smoothness, especially during navigation and gaming. Furthermore, the better camera system, especially the 4k video recording, and the versatile photo capabilities make it a more complete package for me. Although battery life is a bit of a trade-off, the superior display and camera are worth it for my usage patterns. The longer software support also adds value in the long run.
