1. Specifications Comparison
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Motorola Moto G52 | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Design | |||
Dimensions | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm | 160.1 x 74.5 x 8 mm | A52 5G slightly thicker, Moto G52 slightly taller, minimal difference in hand feel. |
Weight | 189g | 169g | Moto G52 feels lighter and more comfortable for extended use. |
Display | |||
Size | 6.5" | 6.6" | Negligible difference in screen size, both feel very similar in daily use. |
Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | Both have the same sharpness and clarity. |
PPI | 407 | 402 | Imperceptible difference in pixel density, both screens are sharp. |
Technology | AMOLED | AMOLED | Both offer vibrant colors, deep blacks, and good contrast. |
Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 90Hz | A52 5G has smoother scrolling and animations, more responsive for gaming. |
Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | No information available, both likely have standard brightness levels. |
Performance | |||
Chipset | Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | A52 5G provides better overall performance, faster app loading, and gaming, while G52 offers slightly better efficiency. |
AnTuTu Score | 384,853 | 216,000 | A52 5G significantly faster, better for demanding tasks and gaming. |
GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 610 | A52 5G handles graphics-intensive tasks better. |
Camera | |||
Standard Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7", Sony IMX682 | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76", Samsung S5KJN1 | A52 5G captures more detail and performs better in low light due to larger sensor. |
Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8", Sony IMX616 | 16MP, f/2.45 | A52 5G produces higher resolution selfies and performs better in low light with wider aperture. |
Wide Angle Lens | 13MP, f/2.2, 1/3.1", Samsung S5K3L6 | 8MP, f/2.2 | A52 5G has a wider, more detailed view for group shots and landscapes. |
Portrait Mode (depth) | 5MP, f/2.4 | None | A52 5G can capture more depth in portrait images. |
Macro Lens | 5MP, f/2.4 | 2MP, f/2.4 | A52 5G captures higher resolution macro shots, more detail in close-up photos. |
Video | Up to 4K@30fps w/EIS | Up to 1080p@30fps | A52 5G records higher quality videos with better stabilization. |
Battery | |||
Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | Moto G52 likely offers longer battery life on a single charge. |
Charging | 25W | 30W | Moto G52 charges slightly faster. |
Software | |||
OS | Android 11 (upgradable to 14) | Android 12 | Moto G52 has a newer base OS, A52 5G has longer software support. |
Connectivity | |||
Wi-Fi | 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; Dual band, Hotspot, Direct, Display | 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; Hotspot, Direct | A52 5G adds wi-fi display and dual band support. |
Bluetooth | 5.0 LE; A2DP, EDR, HID, LE, ANT+ | 5.0 LE; A2DP, AVRCP, DIP, HFP, HID, HSP, LE, PAN, OPP, PBAP/PAB, HOGP, APT-x | Moto G52 offers more Bluetooth profiles. |
GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, Galileo | A52 5G supports Beidou, Moto G52 supports SUPL for better location accuracy. |
Storage | |||
Internal | 128GB/256GB | 64GB/128GB/256GB | Both have similar max storage capacity. |
RAM | 6GB/8GB | 4GB/6GB | A52 5G offers more RAM, for smoother multitasking. |
Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phone has expandable storage. |
Audio | |||
Quality | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphones | Moto G52 likely offers better spatial audio, with dual speakers and microphones for better call quality. |
Security | |||
Features | Basic fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Moto G52 has a more convenient fingerprint sensor. |
Build Quality | |||
Screen Protection | Gorilla Glass 5 | Gorilla Glass 5 | Both have the same screen protection. |
Sensors | |||
Sensors | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope | Moto G52 has additional compass sensor. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Advantages:
- Superior Performance: Snapdragon 750G chipset and Adreno 619 GPU offer significantly better performance for gaming and demanding apps.
- Better Display: 120Hz refresh rate provides smoother animations and a more responsive feel.
- Higher Quality Cameras: Larger sensors and higher resolution in both front and rear cameras result in superior image and video quality.
- More Feature-Rich Camera: Includes OIS, 4K video with EIS, and a dedicated depth sensor for portrait mode, features not present on Moto G52.
- Better Software Support: Guaranteed updates to Android 14.
- More GPS Support: Beidou, for more accurate location tracking in certain regions.
- More RAM: A52 5G has 2GB more RAM than the base G52 for better multitasking.
- Wi-fi Display support: Allows wireless connection to compatible devices.
Motorola Moto G52 Advantages:
- Lighter Design: 20g lighter for a more comfortable feel, especially during long usage.
- Larger Battery: 500mAh more battery capacity results in longer battery life.
- Faster Charging: 30W charging enables quicker power-ups.
- Newer Base OS: Ships with Android 12 out-of-the-box.
- Better Audio: Stereo speakers and dual microphones provide enhanced audio experience.
- More Bluetooth Features: More Bluetooth profiles allows more connection options.
- Side-mounted Fingerprint Sensor: More convenient fingerprint sensor placement.
Trade-offs:
- A52 5G sacrifices battery life and weight for performance, camera quality and a smoother display.
- Moto G52 sacrifices performance, camera quality and screen smoothness for battery life, lightness, and a newer OS version.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G:
- Ideal User: Gamers, social media enthusiasts, photography lovers.
- Use Cases:
- Playing graphically intensive mobile games.
- Capturing high-quality photos and videos in various conditions.
- Heavy multi-tasking and using demanding apps.
- Users who prioritize display smoothness.
- Users who want long term software support.
- Price-to-Value: Good value for users who prioritize performance and camera features.
Motorola Moto G52:
- Ideal User: Casual users, budget-conscious buyers, users who value battery life.
- Use Cases:
- Daily tasks like browsing, social media, and emails.
- Long periods of usage without frequent charging.
- Users who prefer a lighter device.
- Users who want good audio.
- Price-to-Value: Great value for users who want a reliable phone with long battery life at a lower price point.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions:
- How important is gaming and performance to you? (If high, choose A52 5G. If not important, G52 is suitable)
- How much do you prioritize battery life over other features? (If very high, choose G52. If not as important, A52 5G is suitable)
- What is your budget? (If budget is tight, G52 offers great value. If you are willing to spend more, A52 5G may be worth it).
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Mobile Gamer or Media Enthusiast - Choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G for better performance, smoother display, and enhanced camera quality.
- Scenario 2: Casual User with High Battery Needs - Choose the Motorola Moto G52 for longer battery life and a lighter design.
- Scenario 3: Budget-Conscious Buyer - Choose the Motorola Moto G52 for a solid phone with good audio and battery at a lower price point.
What I would choose:
Based on my priorities, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. While the Motorola Moto G52 offers some compelling advantages such as better battery life, lighter design, and a newer base OS, the significantly better performance of the A52 5G's chipset and GPU, paired with a superior display (120Hz) and the camera quality improvements, make it a better overall experience for me. I appreciate the fluid feel of the high refresh rate display, and I value the capability of having a strong camera for photos and videos on the go, even if it means compromising on battery life slightly. The superior performance also means the phone will likely remain usable for a longer time before showing signs of slowdown. Given my personal use case and the importance I place on performance and multimedia consumption, the A52 5G outweighs the Moto G52 for me.