1. Specifications Comparison
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Motorola Moto G31 | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Design | |||
Dimensions | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm | 161.9 x 73.9 x 8.6 mm | Moto G31 is slightly taller, A52 5G slightly wider. Both similar thickness. A52 5G may feel more compact in hand. |
Weight | 189g | 181g | Moto G31 is a bit lighter, which can make it more comfortable for extended use. |
Display | |||
Size | 6.5" | 6.4" | Very similar screen sizes. Difference is negligible. |
Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | Both have the same Full HD+ resolution, leading to similar sharpness. |
PPI | 407 | 411 | Almost identical pixel density; sharpness is practically indistinguishable. |
Technology | AMOLED | AMOLED | Both have vibrant colors and deep blacks, but specific color calibration can differ. |
Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 60Hz | A52 5G provides much smoother scrolling and animations. Noticeable in everyday usage and gaming. |
Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Neither have brightness specified. |
Performance | |||
Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm) | Snapdragon 750G is more powerful and efficient for demanding apps/games and multitasking. |
AnTuTu Score | 384,853 | 225,154 | A52 5G is considerably faster, with smoother overall performance and better gaming potential. |
GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 provides better graphics performance, enhancing gaming and graphically intensive apps. |
Camera | |||
Standard (Rear) | 64MP f/1.8, 1/1.7", IMX682 | 50MP f/1.8, 1/2.76", S5KJN1 | A52 5G has higher resolution and a larger sensor, generally resulting in better low-light photos and detail capture. |
Selfie | 32MP f/2.2, 1/2.8", IMX616 | 13MP f/2.2, 1.12 µm pixel size | A52 5G has significantly higher selfie resolution. |
Wide Angle | 13MP f/2.2, 1/3.1", S5K3L6 | 8MP f/2.0, 1.12 µm pixel size | A52 5G has a higher resolution wide-angle, but Moto G31 has a wider aperture for better low-light performance. |
Portrait (Depth) | 5MP f/2.4 | Not available | A52 5G has a dedicated depth sensor, which can assist with more accurate portrait mode photos. |
Macro | 5MP f/2.4 | 2MP f/2.4 | A52 5G captures higher resolution close-up shots. |
Video | 4K@30fps with EIS, 1080p@60fps | 1080p@30fps | A52 5G supports 4K recording, better quality and flexibility for video. EIS enables more stable videos. |
Video Stabilization | EIS | No | A52 5G provides electronic image stabilization for smoother videos |
Battery | |||
Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | Moto G31 has a larger capacity, likely providing longer battery life. |
Charging | 25W Fast Charging | 10W Fast Charging | A52 5G charges much faster. Significantly less time spent plugged in. |
Software | |||
OS | Android 11, Upgradable to 14 | Android 11 | A52 5G will receive software updates, while the G31 is limited. |
Connectivity | |||
Wi-Fi | 802.11ac Dual-band | 802.11ac Dual-band | Both offer similar Wi-Fi performance and feature sets. |
Bluetooth | 5.0, LE, A2DP, EDR, HID, ANT+ | 5.0, LE, A2DP | A52 5G offers more features, can connect to more devices and has better audio support. |
GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, Galileo | Both offer similar location capabilities, but the G31 additionally supports SUPL. |
Storage | |||
Internal | 128/256GB | 64/128GB | A52 5G offers more storage, especially in the 256GB variant. |
RAM | 6/8GB | 4GB | A52 5G has more RAM, offering smoother multitasking and better gaming. |
Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither device supports expandable storage. |
Audio | |||
Quality | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus | Dolby Atmos, 2 microphones | A52 5G has a more advanced audio experience with Dolby Digital Plus. |
Security | |||
Features | In-display fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint sensors are known to be faster and more reliable. |
Build Quality | |||
Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Not specified | A52 5G has better screen protection, more resistant to scratches and damage. |
Sensors | |||
Sensors | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Geomagnetic | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope | Both are comprehensive, but Moto G31 has Compass for navigation. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Advantages:
- Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 750G chipset and higher RAM lead to significantly better performance in daily tasks, multitasking, and gaming.
- Better Display: The 120Hz refresh rate provides a much smoother user experience, making scrolling and animations look much more fluid.
- Higher Quality Camera: The higher resolution main and selfie cameras, along with 4K video recording and EIS, produce better photos and videos with greater detail and stabilization.
- Faster Charging: 25W charging gets the device back up to full power much quicker.
- Software Support: Guaranteed Android upgrades.
- Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Motorola Moto G31 Advantages:
- Larger Battery: The 5000mAh battery potentially offers longer battery life on a single charge.
- Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor: Generally faster and more reliable than in-display fingerprint readers.
- Lower Price: Typically positioned as a more budget-friendly option, making it accessible for users with limited budget.
- Compass Sensor: Offers better navigation experience.
Trade-offs:
- A52 5G: While it excels in performance and display, it may have slightly shorter battery life than the G31. It is also the more expensive option.
- Moto G31: While it offers a good battery life, it falls behind in performance, screen smoothness, camera quality, and charging speeds.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Ideal User for Samsung Galaxy A52 5G:
- Performance Enthusiasts: Users who prioritize smooth performance, fast app loading, and gaming.
- Camera Lovers: Individuals who want high-quality photos and videos, including 4K recording.
- Media Consumers: People who enjoy watching videos or browsing social media will benefit from the 120Hz display.
Long-term users: Users that appreciate software upgrades.
Use Cases:
- Gaming with smooth graphics and frame rates.
- Capturing high-resolution photos and videos, including in low light.
- Seamless multitasking between apps and media.
- Enjoying a smooth visual experience.
Ideal User for Motorola Moto G31:
- Budget-Conscious Buyers: Users looking for an affordable smartphone with a focus on battery life.
- Everyday Users: People who primarily use their phone for basic tasks and communication, not heavy gaming.
- Battery-Life Seekers: Those who prioritize extended usage without frequent charging.
Navigation-focused users: Those who may appreciate the compass sensor.
Use Cases:
- Extended web browsing and social media use.
- Long hours of music and audiobook playback.
- Basic photography and video recording.
- GPS Navigation.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- What is your budget? The A52 5G is likely more expensive than the G31.
- How important is performance? If you’re a gamer or multitasker, the A52 5G is a better choice.
- How important is smooth display and camera quality? For an immersive screen experience, the A52 5G's 120Hz refresh rate and superior camera are critical.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Budget is tight, prioritize battery: Choose the Motorola Moto G31. The focus on longer battery life outweighs performance and camera weaknesses, making it an affordable daily driver.
- Scenario 2: Budget allows for better performance, camera quality, and smooth experience: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. The improved display, faster processor, and better camera system offer a more premium experience overall.
- Scenario 3: Heavy gaming/multitasking and lots of 4k videos: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. It offers superior performance, significantly better graphics, and better camera quality and capabilities for higher video quality.
- Scenario 4: Need good daily use and battery: The Motorola G31 is sufficient for simple daily use cases.
What I would choose and why
Personally, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G.
My reasoning is as follows:
- Performance Matters: I prioritize overall responsiveness and a smooth experience for my daily use. The Snapdragon 750G chipset is significantly faster and more capable than the Helio G85, leading to smoother multitasking, quicker app loading, and a better gaming experience.
- Display Quality: The 120Hz refresh rate is a major factor for me. It makes everyday interactions, from scrolling social media to browsing the web, much more enjoyable.
- Camera Versatility: I often use my phone for photography and video, and the A52 5G's higher-resolution sensors, 4K recording, and EIS provides more flexibility, and overall better image/video quality.
- Long-Term Use: The promise of software updates, specifically the upgrade to Android 14, ensures that the phone stays up-to-date. The screen protection and better bluetooth will add to this.
- Faster Charging: 25W fast charging is a significant convenience and ensures less downtime for the device. While the G31 has a larger battery, fast charging will allow a quick top up whenever necessary, making battery life a less important point.
While the Moto G31 has its merits, particularly a lower price and larger battery, for me, the advantages of the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G in overall performance, camera, and display quality and future-proofing justify the additional cost. The small battery difference is negligible for my use case, and can be made up with the fast charging.
Ultimately, the best phone choice depends on individual needs and priorities. However, based on the specified information, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G offers a more well-rounded experience.