Smartphone Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs. Motorola Moto G24
1. Specifications Comparison
Here's a detailed comparison of the two phones, focusing on the practical implications of their specifications:
Design
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Motorola Moto G24 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm | 163.5 × 74.5 × 8 mm | Moto G24 is taller and slightly thinner, A52 5G is slightly wider, may influence hand comfort. |
| Weight | 189g | 181g | Moto G24 is lighter, potentially more comfortable for prolonged use. |
| Build | Gorilla Glass 5 front | Unknown front glass protection | A52 5G offers better scratch and shatter protection for the screen due to Gorilla Glass 5, Moto G24's is unknown |
Display
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Motorola Moto G24 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size | 6.5" | 6.56" | Minimal size difference, both offer similar screen real estate for content consumption. |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 | 720 x 1612 | A52 5G's higher resolution results in sharper images and text, making it better for reading and detailed viewing. |
| Pixel Density | 407 PPI | 269 PPI | A52 5G's higher pixel density offers sharper visuals, while the Moto G24 might show slight pixelation on close inspection. |
| Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | A52 5G’s AMOLED display has better contrast, richer colors, and deeper blacks, improving viewing pleasure and readability. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 90Hz | A52 5G offers smoother scrolling and animations, enhancing the user experience, particularly for gaming and social media. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 500 nits | Moto G24 has a higher brightness, making it more usable in bright outdoor conditions. |
Performance
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Motorola Moto G24 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Helio G85 (12 nm) | A52 5G offers better performance in gaming and demanding apps due to its more powerful and efficient chipset. |
| AnTuTu Score | 384,853 | 266,894 | A52 5G demonstrates faster app loading and smoother operation overall, while the Moto G24 is more suited for basic day-to-day tasks |
| GPU | Adreno 619 (Qualcomm Adreno 619) | Mali-G52 MC2 (Arm Mali-G52 MC2) | A52 5G's GPU is better for graphic-intensive tasks like gaming. |
Camera
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Motorola Moto G24 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Camera | 64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7", 0.8µm, Sony IMX682 | 50MP, f/1.8, 0.64µm, unknown sensor | A52 5G has higher resolution and larger sensor, potentially capturing more detail and performing better in low light. |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8", 0.8µm, Sony IMX616 | 8MP, f/2.0, 1.12µm, unknown sensor | A52 5G takes much higher-resolution selfies, though Moto G24's wider aperture may help in low light; Moto G24 has a bigger pixel size for better low light performance |
| Wide Angle | 13MP, f/2.2, 1/3.1", 1.12µm, Samsung S5K3L6 | 2MP, f/2.4, unknown pixel size | A52 5G's wide-angle lens has much higher resolution, making it more useful for landscape shots. |
| Depth | 5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm | Not Available | A52 5G captures better portrait photos with a dedicated depth sensor. |
| Macro | 5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm | 2MP, f/2.4, unknown pixel size | A52 5G takes higher resolution macro photos. |
| Video | 4K@30fps w/ EIS, 1080p@30/60fps w/ EIS | 1080p@30fps | A52 5G supports higher quality 4K video recording with electronic image stabilization. |
| Stabilization | Yes with EIS + OIS | No | A52 5G provides better image and video stability due to the presence of EIS and OIS |
| Features | 4K Video, Quadruple camera, Digital image stabilization, Optical Stabilization (OIS), Ultra stable video, Autofocus, Touch focus, Manual focus, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer, Night Mode | Digital zoom, Triple camera, Digital image stabilization, Autofocus, Touch focus, Phase detection autofocus (PDAF), Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer, RAW | A52 5G has more features and better modes like night mode; Moto G24 offers features like PDAF and RAW mode |
Battery
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Motorola Moto G24 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | Moto G24 likely has longer battery life due to larger capacity. |
| Charging | 25W Fast Charging | 15W Fast Charging | A52 5G charges faster, reducing downtime. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Advantages:
- Superior Display: AMOLED panel with higher resolution, pixel density, and 120Hz refresh rate provides a significantly better visual experience.
- Better Performance: The Snapdragon 750G chipset and Adreno 619 GPU result in smoother performance for gaming and demanding apps.
- Higher Resolution Cameras: Both front and rear cameras offer much higher resolution, capturing more detail and offering better image quality. Includes OIS for better stabilization.
- Faster Charging: 25W fast charging is quicker.
- Advanced Features: Includes features like OIS, 4k video, digital and optical stabilization, quad camera setup, manual focus and Night Mode for better photography and videography.
Motorola Moto G24 Advantages:
- Longer Battery Life: Larger 5000mAh battery provides more usage time between charges.
- Brighter Display: The screen has 500 nits of brightness which makes it more usable in bright sunlight.
- Newer Android Version: Comes with Android 14 out of the box with no word of any future upgrades whereas A52 is limited to Android 14.
- Side Mounted Fingerprint: More convenient than standard fingerprint sensor of the Samsung A52 5G.
- Raw Mode: Ability to capture raw images, which allows for better post processing.
- Stereo Speakers: Enhances audio experience with better sound quality.
Trade-offs:
- The A52 5G sacrifices some battery life for higher display quality and better performance.
- The Moto G24 prioritizes battery life and outdoor visibility, but has a lower-resolution display and weaker overall performance.
- The A52 5G has better camera hardware and capabilities.
- The Moto G24 lacks some of the more advanced features that are present in the A52 5G like OIS and Night Mode, but offers some of its own.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is ideal for:
- Users who prioritize display quality for media consumption (videos, games, etc.).
- Gamers or users who need a smooth and responsive device for demanding applications.
- Photography enthusiasts who want a versatile camera with better image quality and features.
- Users who prioritize performance over battery life, and want fast charging.
- Users who want a premium user experience with a better and feature-rich device.
Use Cases:
- Watching high-definition movies and TV shows.
- Playing graphically intensive mobile games.
- Taking high-quality photos and videos for social media and personal use.
- Multitasking with several apps running simultaneously.
Motorola Moto G24 is ideal for:
- Users who prioritize battery life and need their phone to last through the day.
- Users who frequently use their phones in bright outdoor environments.
- Casual users who mostly use their phones for calls, texts, and basic social media.
- Users who want a simple user experience without too many additional features.
- Budget-conscious buyers who want a newer device.
Use Cases:
- Long days away from a power source.
- Use in sunny environments where screen visibility is important.
- Everyday use, like browsing the internet and checking social media.
Price-to-Value Ratio:
- The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G offers better value for users who prioritize display quality, performance, and camera capabilities.
- The Motorola Moto G24 provides value for users who prioritize battery life, outdoor visibility, and want a newer phone at a more budget-friendly price point.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- How important is display quality and a smooth user experience to you? If it's a priority, the Samsung A52 5G is the better choice. If not, the Moto G24 will be fine.
- How important is battery life? The Moto G24 will last longer, but the A52 5G charges faster, which you must factor in for your personal use case.
- What kind of camera capabilities do you need? For higher resolution and better quality photos and videos, A52 5G is the better choice. If your usage is basic and you want the RAW mode, the G24 would be better.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- For Heavy Media Consumption: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G for its superior display and performance.
- For Outdoor Usage: Choose the Motorola Moto G24 for its high brightness display and longer battery life.
- For Gaming: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G for its superior performance and smoother display.
- For Budget-Conscious Buyers: Choose the Motorola Moto G24 as a newer and more affordable option.
- For better photography Choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G for its better camera hardware and software features.
My Choice
Personally, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. While the Moto G24 has its merits, particularly in battery life and outdoor visibility, the A52 5G offers a significantly superior overall experience. The AMOLED display with its higher resolution, smoother refresh rate, and the better chipset make it a device that I would prefer for my daily usage. The camera system is much better as well, with features like OIS and 4k recording, and the fact that its a more feature rich device. While battery life is essential, I’m confident that the 25w fast charging is enough to keep the A52 5G powered through my regular day of use, without needing to compromise on performance or screen quality.
