Samsung Galaxy A42 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M53 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 11, 2020 April 22, 2022
Release Year 2020 2022

Physical

Volume 107.31 cm³ 93.85 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.81 "/g
Weight 193 g 176 g
Height 164.4 mm 164.7 mm
Width 75.9 mm 77 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 7.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Prism Dot Black
  • Prism Dot White
  • Prism Dot Gray
  • Blue
  • Green
  • Brown

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.7 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2408
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.3 % 85.3 %
Pixel Density 266 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.59 mAh/cm³ 53.28 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750 5G (8 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 12
Maximum OS Version 13 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A42 5GSamsung Galaxy M53Practical Impact
Dimensions164.4 × 75.9 × 8.6 mm164.7 × 77 × 7.4 mmM53 is slightly wider but significantly thinner, potentially feeling sleeker in hand. A42 5G has a larger overall volume
Weight193g176gM53 is noticeably lighter, improving comfort during extended use.
BuildStandardStandardBoth are standard smartphones.

Display

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A42 5GSamsung Galaxy M53Practical Impact
Size6.6"6.7"Minimal difference, negligible in daily use.
Resolution720x16001080x2408M53 offers a much sharper and clearer image, especially noticeable when viewing photos, videos, or reading text.
Pixel Density266 PPI394 PPIM53's higher pixel density translates to finer details and less pixelation.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth provide vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Refresh Rate60Hz120HzM53 delivers smoother scrolling, animations, and gaming experiences.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBrightness not available for either phone, limiting evaluation of outdoor visibility.

Performance

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A42 5GSamsung Galaxy M53Practical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 750 5G (8 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm)M53's Dimensity 900 offers better overall performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
AnTuTu Score392,400500,100M53 is noticeably faster in benchmarks, indicating smoother app loading and multitasking.
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G68 MC4M53's GPU offers better graphics performance, benefiting gaming and video editing.

Camera

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A42 5GSamsung Galaxy M53Practical Impact
Main Camera48MP, f/1.8108MP, f/1.8M53 captures significantly more detailed photos, especially in good lighting.
Sensor Size (Main)1/2"1/1.67"M53's larger sensor allows for better low-light performance and dynamic range.
Selfie Camera20MP, f/2.232MP, f/2.2M53 captures more detailed selfies.
Wide Angle5MP, f/2.28MP, f/2.2M53 captures wider scenes with more detail.
Portrait Mode5MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4A42 5G has a higher resolution, potentially resulting in better bokeh effect.
Macro Lens5MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4A42 5G has a higher resolution, potentially resulting in better macro shots.
Video Recording4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@480fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 1080p@60fpsM53 offers 1080p@60fps for smoother video recording, while A42 5G supports high frame rate slow motion.
Image StabilizationNoDigital image stabilizationM53 can produce smoother videos without as much shakiness.

Battery

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A42 5GSamsung Galaxy M53Practical Impact
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth offer similar battery life under typical usage.
Charging15W Fast Charging25W Fast ChargingM53 charges significantly faster, reducing downtime.
Battery TypeLi-PolymerLi-IonMinimal real-world impact.

Storage

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A42 5GSamsung Galaxy M53Practical Impact
Internal128GB128GB or 256GBM53 offers a higher storage option, useful for users with extensive media libraries.
RAM4/6/8GB6/8GBM53 has a higher minimum RAM.
ExpandableNoNoNo expandable storage in either phone.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Advantages:

  • Compass Sensor: Can be useful for navigation and certain AR applications.
  • High Frame Rate Slow Motion: If slow-motion video capture is important, the A42 5G offers a higher frame rate at 720p.
  • Higher Resolution on Macro and Portrait Camera: A42 5G has 5MP compared to 2MP on the M53.

Samsung Galaxy M53 Advantages:

  • Significantly Better Display: Higher resolution and 120Hz refresh rate provide a much smoother and more enjoyable viewing experience.
  • Faster Performance: The Dimensity 900 chipset offers better overall performance than the Snapdragon 750G.
  • Superior Main Camera: The 108MP sensor captures more detail and performs better in low light.
  • Faster Charging: 25W charging significantly reduces charging time compared to 15W.
  • Lighter and Thinner Design: M53 is more comfortable to hold and carry.
  • Stereo Speakers and Dolby Atmos: Offers a much richer audio experience.
  • Newer Bluetooth: Supports Bluetooth 5.2 for improved connectivity and efficiency.

Trade-offs:

  • The A42 5G's advantages are niche and will only appeal to a smaller subset of users.
  • Both lack expandable storage, which could be limiting for some.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A42 5G:

  • Ideal User: Someone with very specific needs, such as high frame rate slow motion, on a very tight budget.
  • Use Cases:
    • Basic smartphone use with occasional slow-motion video recording.
    • Users who specifically require a compass sensor.

Samsung Galaxy M53:

  • Ideal User: General users who value display quality, performance, and camera capabilities for everyday use and media consumption.
  • Use Cases:
    • Streaming videos and playing games.
    • Taking high-quality photos and videos.
    • Multitasking and running demanding apps.
    • Those who prefer a lightweight and sleek design.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • Given the significant upgrades in display, performance, and camera, the M53 offers a much better price-to-value ratio for most users, even if it costs slightly more.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is display quality to you? (If you prioritize a sharp and smooth display, the M53 is the clear winner.)
  2. How much do you value camera performance? (If you take lots of photos, especially in varied lighting conditions, the M53's 108MP camera is a significant advantage.)
  3. How much do you care about fast charging? (If you need to quickly top up your battery, the M53's 25W charging is much faster.)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Budget is extremely tight, and slow-motion video is a priority. The A42 5G might be acceptable.
  • Scenario 2: General user who wants a good all-around phone for daily use. The M53 is the better choice.
  • Scenario 3: User who consumes a lot of media and plays games on their phone. The M53's display and performance make it the superior option.

My Choice

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M53. The improved display quality, faster processor, significantly better camera, and faster charging offer a much better overall user experience for my typical usage. The lighter design is also a plus. While the A42 5G might have some niche advantages, the M53 excels in the areas that are most important to me: media consumption, photography, and overall performance. For me, the M53 offers a much better balance of features and performance at what I would assume would be a similar price point, representing a better value.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.