1. Specifications Comparison
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A42 5G | Samsung Galaxy M35 | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Design | |||
Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm, 193g | 162.3 x 78.6 x 9.1 mm, 222g | A42 5G is lighter and thinner, potentially more comfortable for extended use and pocketability. M35 is wider and thicker. |
Build Quality | Unknown screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | M35 offers significantly better screen protection against scratches and impacts. A42 5G screen protection is unknown, posing potential durability risks. |
Display | |||
Size | 6.6" | 6.6" | Both offer the same screen real estate. |
Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2340 | M35 provides a much sharper and clearer viewing experience, better for multimedia consumption and detailed content. |
PPI | 266 | 390 | M35 has visibly sharper text and images due to higher pixel density. |
Technology | AMOLED | AMOLED | Both offer vibrant colors and deep blacks typical of AMOLED displays. |
Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 120Hz | M35 delivers smoother scrolling, animations, and gaming experience. |
Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Unable to determine the brightness of the screen. |
Performance | |||
Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750 5G (8 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) | M35's Exynos 1380 is more power-efficient and offers better performance for demanding tasks and gaming. |
AnTuTu Score | 392,400 | 578,500 | M35 provides noticeably faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. |
GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MP5 | M35's Mali-G68 MP5 offers better graphics performance, leading to smoother gaming and video playback. |
Camera | |||
Main Camera | 48MP, f/1.8, 1/2", 0.8µm | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/2", 1.0µm | M35 captures slightly more detailed images and potentially better low-light performance due to larger pixels. |
Ultrawide Camera | 5MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm | 8MP, f/2.2, unknown µm | M35 captures wider scenes with more detail. |
Selfie Camera | 20MP, f/2.2, 1.0µm | 13MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm | A42 5G captures more detailed selfies. |
Macro Camera | 5MP, f/2.4, 1/5", 1.12µm | 2MP, f/2.4, unknown µm | A42 5G captures close-up shots with more detail. |
Depth Camera | 5MP, f/2.4, 1/5", 1.12µm | None | A42 5G can create portrait shots with better background separation. |
Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@480fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60/30fps, 720p@480fps | M35 offers EIS for stabilized video recording at various resolutions. |
Features | PDAF, Quad camera | OIS, All Pixel PDAF, Triple camera | M35 offers better image stabilization (OIS), faster autofocus, and additional AI-powered features for enhanced image processing. |
Battery | |||
Capacity | 5000mAh | 6000mAh | M35 offers significantly longer battery life, especially for heavy users. |
Charging | 15W | 25W | M35 charges much faster, reducing downtime. |
Software | |||
OS | Android 10 (upgradable to 13) | Android 14 | M35 has a more modern Android version with the latest features and security updates. |
Connectivity | |||
WiFi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 | M35 provides faster and more reliable WiFi connectivity, especially in congested networks. |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.3 | M35 offers improved Bluetooth performance, range, and audio codec support (Apt-x, LDAC, Apt-x Adaptive). |
GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | M35 offers more accurate location tracking due to QZSS support. |
Storage | |||
Internal | 128GB | 128/256GB | M35 offers more storage options. |
Expandable | No | No | Neither phone allows for expandable storage. |
Audio | |||
Quality | Basic | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | M35 offers a significantly better audio experience with immersive Dolby Atmos sound and stereo speakers. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Advantages:
- Lighter Weight: More comfortable for extended use.
- Depth Sensor: Dedicated depth sensor that the M35 lacks.
- Macro Lens: Dedicated macro lens that has higher resolution that the M35.
- Lower Price (Likely): Older model, expected to be more affordable.
Samsung Galaxy M35 Advantages:
- Superior Display: Higher resolution and 120Hz refresh rate provide a much better viewing experience.
- Faster Performance: The Exynos 1380 chipset delivers significantly better performance.
- Better Battery Life: The larger 6000mAh battery offers extended usage.
- Faster Charging: 25W charging significantly reduces charging time.
- Improved Camera: OIS, improved autofocus, and better video stabilization.
- Modern Software: Ships with Android 14.
- Enhanced Connectivity: Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.3 provide faster and more reliable connections.
- Better Audio: Stereo speakers and Dolby Atmos support offer a much more immersive audio experience.
- Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus provides significantly better durability.
Trade-offs:
- The Galaxy M35 is heavier and slightly bulkier than the A42 5G.
- The A42 5G may have a slightly better selfie camera.
- The M35 does not have a dedicated depth sensor for portrait mode.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G:
- Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who prioritize a lighter phone and don't need the latest features or top-tier performance.
- Use Cases: Basic tasks like calling, texting, social media browsing, and occasional photography.
- Price-to-Value: Good for users on a tight budget who can compromise on performance and features.
Samsung Galaxy M35:
- Ideal User: Users who value performance, display quality, battery life, and camera capabilities.
- Use Cases: Gaming, video streaming, photography, social media, and productivity tasks.
- Price-to-Value: Excellent for users seeking a well-rounded smartphone experience with modern features.
4. Decision Framework
Consider these questions before deciding:
What is your budget? If you're on a very tight budget, the A42 5G might be the only option, but it's important to shop around and see if you can find the M35 within budget (the analysis is assuming the A42 5G would be much cheaper than the M35).
How important is performance and display quality? If you frequently game, stream videos, or use demanding apps, the M35 is the better choice.
Do you prioritize battery life and fast charging? The M35 offers significantly longer battery life and faster charging speeds.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Basic User: If you primarily use your phone for calls, texts, and light browsing, the A42 5G could suffice if the price is significantly lower, but I would still try to get the M35 because you would have a better experience at nearly everything.
- Multimedia Enthusiast: If you enjoy watching videos, playing games, or taking photos, the M35 is the clear winner due to its superior display, performance, camera, and audio capabilities.
- Power User: If you rely on your phone for productivity tasks and need long battery life, the M35 is the better choice.
My Choice
I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M35.
Why?
The M35 offers a significantly better overall experience. The superior display quality (higher resolution, 120Hz refresh rate), faster performance (Exynos 1380), better camera (OIS, improved autofocus), longer battery life, faster charging, modern software (Android 14), and enhanced connectivity (Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.3) make it a much more compelling device. While the A42 5G is lighter and might be cheaper, the trade-offs in performance, display, and features are too significant for me. The improved user experience of the M35 justifies the likely higher price.