Samsung Galaxy A42 5G vs Nokia C31 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia C31
Nokia C31
Nokia

General

Launch Date November 11, 2020 September 1, 2022
Release Year 2020 2022

Physical

Volume 107.31 cm³ 113.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.38 "/g
Weight 193 g 200 g
Height 164.4 mm 169.2 mm
Width 75.9 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Prism Dot Black
  • Prism Dot White
  • Prism Dot Gray
  • Mint
  • Charcoal
  • Cyan

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.75 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.3 % 83.4 %
Pixel Density 266 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 110.84 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.59 mAh/cm³ 44.49 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5050 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750 5G (8 nm) Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 IMG8322

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 microUSB 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 12
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A42 5GNokia C31Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions164.4 × 75.9 × 8.6 mm169.2 × 78 × 8.6 mmNokia C31 is slightly larger, might feel less comfortable in hand for some
Weight193g200gSamsung Galaxy A42 5G is slightly lighter, potentially more comfortable for extended use
Display
Size6.6"6.75"Nokia C31 has a slightly larger screen for more immersive viewing
Resolution720x1600720x1600Both have the same HD+ resolution; clarity will be similar
PPI266260Very similar pixel density, visually negligible difference in sharpness
TechnologyAMOLEDIPS LCDSamsung has much better contrast and colors, better viewing experience and energy saving with dark themes
Refresh Rate60Hz60HzStandard smoothness, both equal
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBrightness not specified, unclear for outdoor visibility
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 750 5G (8 nm)Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm)Samsung is significantly faster, better for games and demanding tasks
AnTuTu Score392,400109,200Samsung scores much higher, indicating significantly better real-world performance
GPUAdreno 619IMG8322Samsung has a more powerful GPU, superior for gaming and graphics-intensive tasks
Camera
Main Camera48MP, f/1.813MPSamsung captures much more detailed photos, especially in good lighting
Selfie Camera20MP, f/2.25MP, f/2.2Samsung takes much sharper selfies with more detail
Wide Angle Lens5MP, f/2.2NoneSamsung can capture wider scenes, more versatile
Depth Sensor5MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4Samsung's depth sensor is higher resolution, better bokeh effect in portrait mode
Macro Lens5MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4Samsung can capture more detailed macro shots
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@480fps1080p@30fpsSamsung records higher resolution videos and slow-motion option
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5050mAhVery similar capacity, comparable battery life
Charging15W Fast Charging10W Fast ChargingSamsung charges slightly faster, less time plugged in
Software
OSAndroid 10 (upgradable to 13)Android 12Nokia has newer base OS, but Samsung can upgrade to Android 13
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11a/b/g/n/ac802.11b/g/nSamsung supports faster WiFi standards, better for large downloads
Bluetooth5.04.2 LESamsung has newer Bluetooth, supports advanced audio features
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, GalileoBoth support GPS, but Samsung uses more satellite systems
Storage
Internal128 GB64GB/128GBBoth have a 128GB option, but Nokia has a 64GB option too
RAM4GB/6GB/8GB4GBSamsung offers more RAM options for better multitasking
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone supports expandable storage
Security
FingerprintBasicRear-mountedBoth have fingerprint sensors, practical difference negligible
Sensors
SensorsFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeProximity, AccelerometerSamsung has more sensors for enhanced functionality

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Snapdragon 750 5G offers significantly faster processing and graphics compared to the Unisoc chipset in the Nokia C31, leading to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming experience.
  • Better Display: AMOLED screen with better contrast and color vibrancy providing a much more enjoyable viewing experience.
  • Enhanced Camera System: Higher resolution sensors for main, selfie, wide-angle, macro, and depth, along with 4K video recording, provide better picture quality and versatility.
  • Faster Charging: 15W charging is quicker than Nokia's 10W, reducing charge time.
  • More Advanced Connectivity: Newer Wi-Fi and Bluetooth standards improve connection speed and stability.
  • More RAM options: Better for multitasking, comes in 6 and 8 GB options

Practical Implications: The Samsung A42 5G excels in scenarios that require performance, such as gaming, video editing, or running demanding apps. Its AMOLED display offers a much more pleasant viewing experience, and the superior camera system provides far greater image quality.

Nokia C31 Advantages:

  • Slightly Larger Screen: Provides a larger viewing area for content consumption.
  • Newer Base Android Version: It has a newer base Android Version (Android 12).

Practical Implications: The Nokia C31 may be preferred by users who prioritize a larger screen and a newer base OS. However, it will be noticeably slower than the Samsung, especially in resource-intensive tasks.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • Performance vs. Price: The Samsung A42 5G offers much better performance, but this likely comes at a higher price point. The Nokia C31 prioritizes affordability over raw power.
  • Display Quality vs. Screen Size: The Samsung has better screen tech (AMOLED) but the Nokia is slightly larger (IPS LCD).

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Ideal User:

  • Performance-Oriented Users: Gamers, power users, and those who multitask frequently.
  • Media Consumers: Users who value high-quality video playback, vibrant colors, and deep blacks.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who want good quality photos in various conditions and versatile camera modes.
  • Future Proof Users: Users who want their phone to be compatible with newer technologies.

Use Cases:

  • Playing demanding mobile games (e.g., Genshin Impact, Call of Duty Mobile).
  • Editing photos and videos on the go.
  • Binging movies and TV shows with vivid colors and excellent contrast.
  • Taking detailed pictures in different lighting conditions.

Nokia C31 Ideal User:

  • Budget-Conscious Users: Those looking for the most affordable option.
  • Basic Smartphone Users: Those who primarily use their phones for communication, browsing, and light social media.
  • Users Who Prefer Larger Screen: Those who prefer a larger display size for comfortable media consumption.

Use Cases:

  • Basic web browsing and social media.
  • Making calls and sending messages.
  • Watching videos occasionally.
  • Simple tasks that don't require much processing power.

Price-to-Value:

  • The Samsung A42 5G likely offers a better price-to-value ratio if performance and camera quality are a priority.
  • The Nokia C31 is the most budget-friendly, appealing to those willing to compromise on performance for the lowest cost.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is my primary use case for the phone? (Gaming, media consumption, basic communication, etc.)
  2. How important is performance for me? (Do I need a fast phone or is basic performance acceptable?)
  3. What is my budget? (Am I willing to spend more for a better overall experience?)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Heavy Mobile Gamer
    • Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A42 5G. The superior processing power, GPU, and display quality make it the clear choice for demanding games.
  • Scenario 2: Budget-Conscious User
    • Recommendation: Nokia C31. The lower cost will appeal to those who prioritize affordability.
  • Scenario 3: Media Enthusiast
    • Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A42 5G. The AMOLED screen with better contrast and colours is better for enjoying videos.
  • Scenario 4: Casual User
    • Recommendation: It depends on the importance of performance. The Samsung is the better overall choice, while the Nokia is acceptable for basic tasks.

What I Would Choose and Why

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A42 5G.

Reasons:

  1. Performance: The Snapdragon 750 5G offers a massive performance advantage over the Unisoc chipset, which is critical for daily usage and future-proofing.
  2. Display: The AMOLED screen is far superior to the IPS LCD in the Nokia C31, providing a much better viewing experience with vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and superior contrast.
  3. Camera: The higher resolution sensors, wide-angle lens, and 4K video capabilities make the A42 5G a much more versatile camera phone, even if it means carrying a slightly heavier phone.
  4. Connectivity: It offers better connectivity standards with its faster WiFi and better bluetooth.
  5. RAM Options: The Samsung Galaxy A42 5G comes in different RAM configurations that can go up to 8GB.
  6. Longevity: With it's upgrade capabilities to Android 13, better performance and better connectivity, I expect it will last longer than the Nokia C31.

While the Nokia C31 is the more budget-friendly option and has a slightly larger screen, the significant performance advantage, far better display, superior camera, and faster charging of the Samsung Galaxy A42 5G make it the clear winner for me. I value the overall user experience over the slight price increase and slightly larger screen.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.