Samsung Galaxy A42 5G vs Motorola One 5G Ace - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 11, 2020 January 14, 2021
Release Year 2020 2021

Physical

Volume 107.31 cm³ 125.14 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.16 "/g
Weight 193 g 212 g
Height 164.4 mm 166.1 mm
Width 75.9 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 9.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Prism Dot Black
  • Prism Dot White
  • Prism Dot Gray
  • Frosted Silver
  • Volcanic Gray

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.7 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.3 % 85.7 %
Pixel Density 266 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.59 mAh/cm³ 39.96 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750 5G (8 nm) Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570)
GPU Adreno 619 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 10
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A42 5GMotorola One 5G AcePractical Impact
Design
Dimensions164.4 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9 mmMotorola is slightly taller and thicker, may feel bulkier
Weight193g212gSamsung is significantly lighter, more comfortable for long use
Display
Size6.6"6.7"Motorola has slightly more screen real estate, but difference is minor
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2400Motorola's display is significantly sharper; clearer text and images
Pixel Density266 ppi393 ppiMotorola offers much sharper visuals
TechnologyAMOLEDIPS LCDSamsung's AMOLED has deeper blacks and more vibrant colors, better for content consumption
Refresh Rate60Hz60HzBoth offer the standard refresh rate of 60Hz
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBrightness not specified
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 750 5GSnapdragon 750G 5GSamsung's chip scores higher in benchmarks, offering better performance
AnTuTu Score392,400330,000Samsung should offer a slightly snappier experience
GPUAdreno 619Adreno 619Both have identical GPU performance for games and graphics
Camera
Rear Main48MP, f/1.848MP, f/1.7Motorola's wider aperture may capture slightly more light, better low light photos
Selfie20MP, f/2.216MP, f/2.2Samsung offers higher resolution selfies
Wide Angle5MP, f/2.28MP, f/2.2Motorola captures more details with wide angle shots
Portrait Mode5MP, f/2.4N/ASamsung allows depth effect for portrait photos
Macro Lens5MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4Samsung captures higher resolution macro photos
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fpsMotorola offers additional 1080p at 60fps and Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS)
Camera Features4K Video, Quadruple camera, Autofocus, Touch focus, PDAF, Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance, ISO, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timerDigital zoom, Triple camera, Digital image stabilization, Autofocus, Touch focus, PDAF, Laser autofocus (LAF), Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance, ISO, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer, RAW, Night ModeSamsung features 4K video and Quadruple camera, while Motorola has image stabilization, RAW and Night Mode
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth should offer similar battery life
Charging15W Fast Charging15W Fast ChargingBoth support same speed charging
FeaturesNon-removableNon-removable, 10W in-box chargerMotorola includes charger in-box
Software
OSAndroid 10, max Android 13Android 10Samsung will receive software update
Connectivity
WiFi802.11 a/b/g/n/ac802.11 a/b/g/n/acSimilar Wi-Fi standards on both
Bluetooth5.05.1 LEMotorola has newer Bluetooth with power-saving benefits
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, GalileoSamsung includes Beidou while Motorola includes SUPL for satellite location
SIMDual SIMSingle SIMSamsung can use two SIM cards concurrently
Storage
Internal128GB64/128GBSamsung offers only 128 GB storage while Motorola provides the option for both
RAM4/6/8GB4/6GBSamsung offers more RAM on its max variant
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone can expand storage via microSD
Audio
QualityBasic audio2 microphonesMotorola has better voice recording
Security
FeaturesFingerprint SensorRear-mounted Fingerprint SensorBoth have standard fingerprint security
Build
Screen ProtectionUnknownUnknownSpecific screen protection is unknown for both devices
Sensors
FeaturesFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, GeomagneticFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeBoth offer a similar range of sensors, with Samsung having an additional Geomagnetic sensor

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A42 5G Advantages:

  • Lighter Design: More comfortable for extended use, better portability.
  • AMOLED Display: Superior contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors, great for content consumption.
  • Higher Benchmark Performance: Marginally faster performance for games and demanding applications.
  • Higher Resolution Selfie Camera: More detailed selfies.
  • Portrait mode (depth) lens: Ability to take portrait pictures.
  • Additional Geomagnetic sensor: More precise heading measurements, useful for advanced applications.
  • Dual SIM: Flexibility to use two phone numbers.
  • More RAM: Top variant provides more RAM, better for multitasking and gaming
  • Maximum Android Version: Will get Android software update.

Motorola One 5G Ace Advantages:

  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution display is noticeable for reading text and viewing images.
  • Wider Aperture Main Camera: Better low-light performance in the main camera.
  • Higher Resolution Wide Angle: Takes more detailed wide angle shots.
  • EIS and 1080p@60 fps Video Recording: Smoother video recording, important for videos and vlogs.
  • In-box charger: 10W Rapid Charger included, a cost saving.
  • Newer Bluetooth: Better power efficiency for wireless accessories.
  • Dual Microphones: Better voice recording for calls and video.
  • RAW Photo and Night Mode: Better low light photos and post editing opportunities.
  • Laser Autofocus (LAF): Faster focus on subjects.

Trade-offs:

  • Samsung trades display sharpness for superior contrast and colors (AMOLED).
  • Motorola trades lightweight design for slightly better low light photography and sharper display.
  • Samsung lacks features such as EIS, RAW and Night Mode for camera, while offering better selfie camera.
  • Motorola doesn't have a dedicated portrait (depth) sensor and is restricted to only single SIM.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A42 5G:

  • Ideal User: Users who value display quality, light weight, better multitasking, and high quality selfies, users who prefer AMOLED over IPS, and users who use two SIMs at the same time.
  • Use Cases:
    • Consuming media (videos, movies)
    • Social media browsing and taking selfies
    • Users who need more RAM for gaming
    • Travelers or users needing dual SIM capability
    • Users who need good performance for daily use

Motorola One 5G Ace:

  • Ideal User: Users who want a sharper display and slightly better low light photography, and require better video recording quality with stabilization and prefer a single SIM setup.
  • Use Cases:
    • Taking photos and videos on the go
    • Users who want 1080p 60fps recording
    • Users looking for better voice recording capabilities
    • Users who want a pre-included rapid charger
    • Casual gaming and multimedia consumption

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. Display Preference: Do you prefer the vibrancy of AMOLED (Samsung) or the sharpness of an IPS LCD (Motorola)?
  2. Camera Needs: Is selfie resolution or better low-light performance and video features more important?
  3. Portability vs. Features: Do you prioritize a lighter phone (Samsung) or is slightly better camera and video features worth the extra weight and size (Motorola)?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • For the Content Creator: If video is a priority, the Motorola One 5G Ace with its EIS and 1080p 60fps recording is the better choice.
  • For the Casual User: The Samsung Galaxy A42 5G provides a more balanced overall experience with its lighter design, better display for content consumption, and dual SIM support.
  • For the Power User: The Samsung Galaxy A42 5G would be a better pick due to the higher RAM option which allows for a smoother multi-tasking experience.

My Choice

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A42 5G. While the Motorola One 5G Ace offers a sharper display and some notable camera benefits (especially with EIS and video), the overall package of the Samsung is more appealing to me for my daily use. Here's why:

  • AMOLED Display: As someone who consumes a lot of media, the vibrancy and deep blacks of the AMOLED screen are a significant advantage.
  • Lighter Design: The lighter design improves comfort during extended use, which is something I do very often.
  • Dual SIM Support: This is extremely important for me as it means I can handle two phone numbers without carrying two devices.
  • Performance: Although a marginal difference, the better benchmark scores are beneficial for a smoother overall experience.
  • Software support: The Android OS upgrade path makes the phone more future proof than the Motorola.

While the Motorola has its merits, the Samsung Galaxy A42 5G's combination of display quality, design, and software support align better with my personal priorities and usage patterns. The slight difference in performance isn't a dealbreaker in real world usage.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.