Samsung Galaxy A35 vs Xiaomi Redmi A3x - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 15, 2024 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 103.42 cm³ 106.65 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.16 "/g 3.48 "/g
Weight 209 g 193 g
Height 161.7 mm 168.4 mm
Width 78 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon
  • Midnight Black
  • Olive Green
  • Moonlight White (Starry White)
  • Aurora Green (Ocean Green)

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.71 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 720 x 1650
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.8 % 82.9 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 268 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 111.05 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.34 mAh/cm³ 46.88 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Unisoc T603 (22 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core 1.8 GHz
GPU Mali-G68 MP5 8

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 18 16

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A35 vs. Xiaomi Redmi A3x: A Detailed Comparison

The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, with manufacturers constantly vying for users' attention. Today, we'll dissect two contenders: the Samsung Galaxy A35 and the Xiaomi Redmi A3x. By examining their specifications and translating them into real-world implications, we'll help you determine which phone best suits your needs.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A35Xiaomi Redmi A3xReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions161.7x78x8.2mm168.4x76.3x8.3mmA35 is slightly shorter and narrower, potentially offering a more comfortable one-handed grip.
Weight209g193gA3x is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Display TypeSuper AMOLED, 120HzIPS LCD, 90HzA35 boasts vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling thanks to AMOLED and 120Hz.
Resolution1080x2340720x1650A35 offers significantly sharper visuals with higher pixel density (390 ppi vs. 268 ppi).
Brightness1000 nits (HBM)500 nitsA35 should be much more readable in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1380 (5nm)Unisoc T603 (22nm)A35's 5nm processor promises significantly better performance and power efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core 1.8 GHzA35's more powerful CPU cores will handle demanding tasks and multitasking with greater ease.
GPUMali-G68 MP58A35's GPU will deliver a far superior gaming experience and smoother performance in visually intensive apps.
RAM8GB4GBA35's larger RAM enables smoother multitasking and faster app loading.
Storage128/256GB128GBBoth offer ample storage, but A35 provides a 256GB option for users needing more space.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery capacities suggest comparable battery life, though A35's efficiency might give it an edge.
Software
OSAndroid 14Android 14Both run the latest Android version, but A35 is likely to receive longer software updates.NFCYesNoA35 supports contactless payments and data transfer via NFC.

2. Key Insights

The Samsung Galaxy A35 clearly outperforms the Redmi A3x in almost every category. Its superior display, significantly faster processor, more RAM, and inclusion of NFC make it a more compelling device. The Redmi A3x's main advantage lies in its lower price point and lighter weight.

User Experience Differences: The A35 will provide a noticeably smoother and more responsive experience, especially in demanding tasks like gaming or multitasking. Its vibrant display will enhance media consumption, while the 120Hz refresh rate will make scrolling and animations feel incredibly fluid. The Redmi A3x, while functional, will likely exhibit slower performance and a less impressive visual experience.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A35: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a premium display, and future-proof features like NFC. Gamers, content creators, and those who demand a smooth and responsive user experience will appreciate the A35.

Xiaomi Redmi A3x: Best suited for budget-conscious users who primarily use their phones for basic tasks like calling, texting, and browsing. Its lower price makes it an attractive option for those seeking a functional smartphone without breaking the bank.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Questions to Consider:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi A3x is significantly cheaper, making it a more accessible option.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? For demanding tasks, the A35 is a clear winner. For basic use, the A3x might suffice.
  3. How important are features like NFC and a high-quality display? If these are priorities, the A35 is the better choice.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Student on a tight budget: Redmi A3x
  • Mobile gamer: Samsung Galaxy A35
  • Professional who needs a reliable and performant device: Samsung Galaxy A35
  • Casual user primarily focused on communication: Redmi A3x (if budget is a major concern), Galaxy A35 (if performance and display are valued).
Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.