Samsung Galaxy A35 vs Realme C61 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C61
Realme C61
Realme

General

Launch Date March 15, 2024 July 25, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 103.42 cm³ 100.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.16 "/g 3.59 "/g
Weight 209 g 188 g
Height 161.7 mm 167.3 mm
Width 78 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon
  • Dark Green
  • Sparkle Gold

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.74 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.8 % 85.5 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness 1000 nits 560 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.34 mAh/cm³ 49.96 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MP5 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A35 vs. Realme C61: A Comparative Analysis

The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, with devices vying for your attention with a blend of features and affordability. Today, we dissect two contenders: the Samsung Galaxy A35 and the Realme C61. Both offer compelling features, but cater to different user priorities. Let's delve into a detailed comparison to uncover which device reigns supreme.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A35Realme C61Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions161.7x78x8.2mm167.3x76.7x7.8mmA35 is slightly smaller, potentially offering a better one-handed grip.
Weight209g188gC61 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Display TypeSuper AMOLED, 120HzIPS LCD, 90HzA35 boasts vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling thanks to AMOLED technology and a higher refresh rate. C61's display is adequate but less impressive.
Resolution1080x2340720x1600A35 offers significantly sharper visuals and clearer text.
PPI Density390260Reinforces the A35's superior sharpness; images and text will appear crisper.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1380 (5nm)Unisoc Tiger T612 (12nm)A35's 5nm processor promises significantly better performance and power efficiency compared to the C61's 12nm chip. Expect smoother multitasking and faster app loading on the A35.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)The A35 possesses higher clock speeds and more powerful cores, translating to superior performance in demanding tasks and gaming.
GPUMali-G68 MP5Mali-G57A35's GPU should deliver smoother graphics and better gaming performance.
RAM8GB6GBA35's extra RAM enables smoother multitasking and reduces app reloading.
Storage128GB/256GB256GBBoth offer ample storage, though the A35 provides a 128GB option for potentially lower cost.
CameraNot enough dataNot enough dataUnable to compare based on provided information. More details on sensor size, aperture, and features are needed for a meaningful analysis.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhBoth offer similar battery capacity, but the A35's more efficient processor could translate to longer real-world usage.
Other
OSAndroid 14Android 14Both run the latest Android version. Long-term software updates will likely favor the Samsung device.
NFCYesNoA35 supports contactless payments and data transfer via NFC, a feature absent in the C61.
Price RangeMediumLowReflects the overall value proposition; A35 offers premium features at a higher price point.

2. Key Insights

The Samsung Galaxy A35 positions itself as a performance-oriented mid-ranger. Its powerful Exynos processor, coupled with a vibrant AMOLED display and higher refresh rate, delivers a premium user experience. The inclusion of NFC adds to its versatility.

The Realme C61, on the other hand, prioritizes affordability. While its specifications are less impressive, it offers a large display and a long-lasting battery. The lighter weight might appeal to some users.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Galaxy A35: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a smooth and vibrant display, and features like NFC for mobile payments. Gamers, multitaskers, and content consumers will appreciate its capabilities.

Realme C61: Best suited for budget-conscious users who primarily use their phones for basic tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and social media. Its large display is suitable for media consumption, but demanding applications might push its limits.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Questions to Consider:

  1. What is your budget? The Realme C61 is significantly more affordable.
  2. How important is performance and display quality? The Galaxy A35 excels in these areas.
  3. Do you need NFC for contactless payments? This is a key differentiator, only available on the A35.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Student on a Tight Budget: Realme C61
  • Professional who values performance and multitasking: Galaxy A35
  • Casual user who prioritizes display quality for media consumption: Galaxy A35

By carefully considering your needs and priorities in light of this comparison, you can confidently choose the smartphone that best fits your lifestyle and budget.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.