Samsung Galaxy A35 vs Oppo Reno12 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 15, 2024 June 18, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 103.42 cm³ 89.39 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.16 "/g 3.72 "/g
Weight 209 g 180 g
Height 161.7 mm 161.5 mm
Width 78 mm 74.8 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 7.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon
  • Space Brown
  • Sunset Gold
  • Nebula Silver
  • Manish Malhotra

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.8 % 89.4 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.34 mAh/cm³ 55.93 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MP5 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 18 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A35Oppo Reno12 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions161.7x78x8.2mm161.5x74.8x7.4mmThe Oppo is slightly smaller and noticeably thinner, making it potentially more pocketable and comfortable to hold.
Weight209g180gThe Oppo is significantly lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
ColorsNavy, Iceblue, Lilac, LemonSpace Brown, Sunset Gold, Nebula Silver, Manish MalhotraColor options are subjective, but the Oppo offers a more diverse palette.
Display
Size6.6"6.7"Negligible difference in screen real estate.
TypeSuper AMOLED, 120HzAMOLED, 1B colors, 120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and vibrant colors. The Oppo's 1B colors potentially provide smoother color gradients, but the difference might be subtle to the average user.
Resolution1080x23401080x2412Similar pixel density, resulting in comparable sharpness.
Peak BrightnessNot specified1200 nitsThe Oppo's superior peak brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight. The lack of this spec for the Samsung phone makes a direct comparison impossible.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1380 (5 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm)Both are mid-range chipsets, but the 4nm process on the Oppo suggests potential advantages in power efficiency and performance, though real-world performance depends on optimization.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)The Oppo has slightly faster prime cores, potentially leading to quicker app launches and multitasking performance.
GPUMali-G68 MP5Mali-G615 MC2The Samsung likely has a more powerful GPU based on specifications, offering smoother gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.
RAM/Storage128GB/8GB, 256GB/8GB512GB/12GBThe Oppo offers significantly more storage and RAM, enabling smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and ample space for files.
Camera
Video Capabilities4K@30fps (EIS)4K@30fps (HDR, OIS, EIS), ...up to 720p@960fpsThe Oppo boasts superior video recording features, including OIS for stabilization, HDR for better dynamic range, and high frame rate options for slow-motion video.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacities suggest comparable battery life, although real-world usage will vary depending on factors like display brightness and usage patterns.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A35 Advantages:

  • Potentially Stronger GPU: This could translate to a better gaming experience.

Oppo Reno12 Pro Advantages:

  • Lighter and Slimmer Design: More comfortable for one-handed use and portability.
  • Brighter Display: Enhanced outdoor visibility.
  • More RAM and Storage: Smoother multitasking and ample space for files.
  • Superior Video Recording: More versatile camera functionality with OIS and higher frame rates.
  • Faster Prime CPU Cores: Potentially faster app launches and quicker processing for demanding tasks.

Trade-offs:

  • The Oppo Reno12 Pro's potentially less powerful GPU might be a trade-off for its other advantages, especially for users who prioritize gaming.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A35: Users who prioritize a potentially better gaming experience on a budget.

Oppo Reno12 Pro: Users who value a sleek design, bright display, ample storage, excellent camera capabilities, and overall smoother performance in everyday tasks. Suitable for content creators, social media enthusiasts, and users who multitask heavily.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? Both are mid-range but price differences might exist.
  2. What are your primary use cases? (Gaming, photography, general use)
  3. Which features matter most? (Design, display, performance, camera)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy Gamer: Consider the Samsung Galaxy A35 if its GPU proves significantly better in benchmarks. Otherwise, the Oppo's larger RAM and storage might benefit demanding games.
  • Content Creator: The Oppo Reno12 Pro is the clear choice with its superior camera features and ample storage.
  • Everyday User: The Oppo Reno12 Pro offers a more well-rounded package for most users with its superior design, display, and performance in day-to-day tasks. However, if budget is a major constraint, the Samsung Galaxy A35 could be a viable option.
Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.