Samsung Galaxy A35 vs Motorola Moto G04s - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 15, 2024 April 29, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 103.42 cm³ 97.45 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.16 "/g 3.67 "/g
Weight 209 g 178.8 g
Height 161.7 mm 163.5 mm
Width 78 mm 74.5 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon
  • Sunrise Orange
  • Sea Green
  • Concord Black
  • Satin Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.56 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.8 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 269 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 116.19 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.34 mAh/cm³ 51.31 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MP5 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A35 vs. Motorola Moto G04s: Detailed Comparison

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A35Motorola Moto G04sPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions161.7x78x8.2mm163.5x74.5x8mmA35 is slightly taller and wider, but negligibly thinner.
Weight209g178.8gG04s is noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild materials impact durability and premium feel; information is missing for both.
Display
Display TypeSuper AMOLED, 120HzIPS LCD, 90HzA35 offers more vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling thanks to AMOLED and 120Hz.
Size6.6"6.56"Negligible size difference.
Resolution1080x2340 (FHD+)720x1612 (HD+)A35 has a significantly sharper display, leading to clearer text and images.
Refresh Rate120Hz90HzA35 provides smoother animations and scrolling.
Peak Brightness1000 nits (HBM)Not specifiedA35's high peak brightness ensures better visibility in sunlight; G04s brightness is unknown.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1380 (5nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)A35's 5nm chipset will likely offer significantly better performance and power efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)A35 has faster and more powerful CPU cores, resulting in smoother multitasking and app loading.
GPUMali-G68 MP5Mali-G57 MP1A35's GPU is considerably more powerful, enabling better gaming performance and graphics rendering.
RAM8GB4GBA35 offers more RAM, enabling better multitasking and preventing app closures in the background.
Storage128/256GB128GBBoth offer ample storage, but A35 provides a 256GB option for users needing more space.
Camera
Rear CameraNot specifiedNot specifiedDetailed camera specifications are missing, preventing a meaningful comparison.
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps (EIS)1080p@30fpsA35 offers higher resolution video recording and potentially better stabilization (EIS at higher frame rates).
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth have the same battery capacity, but real-world battery life depends on optimization and display efficiency.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A35 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED with 120Hz refresh rate provides a vastly improved visual experience.
  • Significantly Better Performance: The Exynos 1380 outperforms the Unisoc T606 in CPU, GPU, and power efficiency.
  • More RAM: 8GB RAM ensures smoother multitasking.
  • Higher Resolution Video Recording: Offers 4K recording and potentially better stabilization.

Motorola Moto G04s Advantages:

  • Lighter Weight: More comfortable for extended use and one-handed operation.
  • Potentially Lower Price: While both are mid-range, Motorola often positions its G series more affordably.

Trade-offs:

  • A35: Potentially higher price for premium features.
  • G04s: Compromises on display quality, performance, and video capabilities for a potentially lower price.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A35: Users who prioritize display quality, performance, and smooth multitasking, such as mobile gamers, content consumers, and power users.

Motorola Moto G04s: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality, long battery life (assuming similar optimization to A35), and a lightweight design. Best suited for casual users primarily focused on calling, texting, and light web browsing.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The A35 will likely be more expensive.
  2. What are your primary smartphone uses? Gamers and heavy users will benefit from the A35's performance, while casual users might find the G04s sufficient.
  3. How important is display quality? The A35's AMOLED display is a major differentiator.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget: Moto G04s
  • Prioritize Performance and Display: Samsung Galaxy A35
  • Casual User with Basic Needs: Moto G04s
  • Mobile Gamer or Power User: Samsung Galaxy A35
Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.