Samsung Galaxy A34 vs ZTE Blade V60 Design - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 June 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 103.3 cm³ 106.33 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.32 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 199 g 198 g
Height 161.3 mm 164.2 mm
Width 78.1 mm 75.3 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Champagne Gold
  • Dark Blue
  • Sunrise Violet

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 84.6 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.4 mAh/cm³ 47.02 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A34ZTE Blade V60 DesignPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2164.2 x 75.3 x 8.6A34 is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight (g)199198Negligible weight difference.
Fingerprint SensorUnder DisplaySide-mountedPersonal preference, under-display often perceived as more premium.
Display
Display TypeSuper AMOLED, 120HzIPS LCD, 90HzA34 offers significantly better colors, contrast, and smoother scrolling with AMOLED and higher refresh rate.
Resolution1080 x 2340720 x 1612A34 has a much sharper display, noticeable in text clarity and image detail.
PPI390267A34's higher pixel density results in a crisper, more detailed image.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1080 (6nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)A34's processor is more powerful and power-efficient due to smaller fabrication process. Expect smoother multitasking and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.6 GHz A78 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz A75 & 6x1.6 GHz A55)A34 boasts faster clock speeds leading to noticeably better performance in demanding tasks.
GPUMali-G68 MC4Mali-G57 MP1A34 provides significantly better graphics performance, important for gaming and visually intensive applications.
RAM6/8GB4/6GBA34 offers more RAM options, enabling better multitasking and smoother performance with multiple apps open.
Camera
Main Camera48MP, Sony IMX58250MP, ISOCELLWhile ZTE has higher megapixels, the sensor details for the ZTE are missing, making a detailed comparison difficult. A34 lists a reputable Sony sensor.
Video Recording4K@30fps1080p@30fpsA34 supports higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity.
Fast Charging25W22.5WA34 offers slightly faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A34 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED with 120Hz provides richer colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling compared to the ZTE's IPS LCD with 90Hz.
  • Significantly Better Performance: The Dimensity 1080 chipset and more RAM offer a smoother and more responsive user experience, especially in demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Higher Resolution Camera and Video: 4K video recording capability provides more detailed videos. While ZTE has a 50MP sensor, lack of detail makes a comprehensive comparison impossible.

ZTE Blade V60 Design Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Positioned in the low price range, offering a more budget-friendly option.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A34: Users who prioritize display quality, performance, and overall camera experience. Suitable for:

  • Gamers: The powerful GPU and high refresh rate display will provide a smooth gaming experience.
  • Content Consumers: The vibrant AMOLED display enhances video watching and web browsing.
  • Power Users: Handles multitasking and demanding applications with ease.

ZTE Blade V60 Design: Users on a tight budget who prioritize basic functionality. Suitable for:

  • Casual Users: Primarily using the phone for calling, texting, and light web browsing.
  • Budget-Conscious Buyers: Looking for an affordable smartphone without demanding high performance.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The ZTE is significantly cheaper.
  2. How important is display quality and performance? The A34 excels in these areas.
  3. What are your primary use cases? Gaming, content consumption, and demanding tasks favor the A34. Basic communication and light usage might suffice with the ZTE.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A34

While the ZTE Blade V60 Design offers a budget-friendly option, the Samsung Galaxy A34 provides a significantly better overall user experience. The superior AMOLED display with 120Hz, the much more powerful processor, and the potential for a better camera (lack of ZTE sensor details makes definitive statement impossible) justify the higher price for most users. The A34's performance and display alone make it a worthwhile investment for a smoother, more enjoyable smartphone experience in the long run. The difference in price is easily justified by the substantial jump in quality and performance. The ZTE might be suitable for extremely budget-conscious buyers who only need basic functionality, but for anyone who values a responsive and enjoyable user experience, the A34 is the clear winner.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.