Samsung Galaxy A34 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 September 21, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 103.3 cm³ 106.59 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.32 "/g 3.35 "/g
Weight 199 g 199 g
Height 161.3 mm 161.4 mm
Width 78.1 mm 74.2 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Midnight Black (Fushion Black)
  • Moonlight White (Fushion White)
  • Aurora Purple
  • Fushion Purple
  • Camo Green

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1220 x 2712
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 89.7 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 446 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1800 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.4 mAh/cm³ 46.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G610 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 17 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A34Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9Redmi is slightly narrower but thicker. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)199199Identical weight.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.67Redmi has a slightly larger display, providing marginally more screen real estate.
Resolution (px)1080 x 23401220 x 2712Redmi boasts a significantly sharper display with higher pixel density, resulting in crisper text and images.
TypeSuper AMOLED, 120HzAMOLED, 120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations thanks to the 120Hz refresh rate. AMOLED technology ensures vibrant colors and deep blacks. Redmi's claimed 1800 nits peak brightness surpasses A34's 1000nits offering superior outdoor visibility.
HDRNo Dolby Vision, HDR10/10+ unspecifiedDolby Vision, HDR10+Redmi offers a superior HDR experience with wider color gamut and dynamic range, enhancing video and gaming visuals.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm)Redmi's 4nm chipset should offer better power efficiency and potentially higher sustained performance compared to the A34's 6nm chipset. "Ultra" designation suggests potential performance advantages for the Redmi but real-world testing is needed to confirm.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)Redmi's newer CPU architecture (Cortex-A715) might offer performance and efficiency improvements over the A34's Cortex-A78 cores. Clock speed differences are minor.
GPUMali-G68 MC4Mali-G610 MC4While both use Mali GPUs, architectural differences exist. Real-world gaming performance needs further comparison.
RAM6GB/8GB8GB/12GB/16GBRedmi offers higher RAM options, enabling better multitasking and smoother performance with demanding applications.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)48200Redmi boasts a much higher resolution main sensor potentially capturing more detail. However, megapixel count isn't everything; sensor size and processing play a crucial role in image quality.
DxOMark Score92121Redmi scores significantly higher in DxOMark tests, indicating superior overall camera performance.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity.
Fast Charging (W)25120Redmi supports significantly faster charging, drastically reducing charging times.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A34 Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: Typically positioned at a more affordable price point within the mid-range segment.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ Advantages:

  • Superior Display: Sharper, brighter, and with better HDR support.
  • Faster Performance: More powerful and efficient chipset, newer CPU architecture, and higher RAM options.
  • Significantly Better Camera: Higher resolution main sensor, better DxOMark score, indicating superior image quality.
  • Much Faster Charging: 120W fast charging drastically reduces downtime.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A34: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic smartphone functionality and a decent AMOLED display. Suitable for everyday tasks like web browsing, social media, and casual photography.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+: Users who demand high performance, a top-notch display, and excellent camera capabilities. Ideal for mobile gaming, content consumption, and photography enthusiasts.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The A34 is likely more affordable.
  2. What are your performance needs? Gaming and demanding tasks favor the Redmi Note 13 Pro+.
  3. How important is camera quality and charging speed? The Redmi significantly outperforms the A34 in these areas.

My Choice: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+

While the Samsung Galaxy A34 might be a decent budget option, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ offers a compelling package with its superior display, performance, camera, and charging capabilities. The significantly faster charging alone is a huge convenience in today's fast-paced world. The improved display and camera system make it a more enjoyable device for media consumption and capturing memories. While pricing may vary, the overall value proposition of the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ makes it the clear winner for me. I prioritize performance, a great screen, and fast charging, and the Redmi delivers on all fronts.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.