Samsung Galaxy A34 vs Xiaomi Redmi A3x - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 103.3 cm³ 106.65 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.32 "/g 3.48 "/g
Weight 199 g 193 g
Height 161.3 mm 168.4 mm
Width 78.1 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Midnight Black
  • Olive Green
  • Moonlight White (Starry White)
  • Aurora Green (Ocean Green)

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.71 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 720 x 1650
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 82.9 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 268 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 111.05 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.4 mAh/cm³ 46.88 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) Unisoc T603 (22 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core 1.8 GHz
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 8

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A34Xiaomi Redmi A3xPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2168.4 x 76.3 x 8.3A34 is slightly smaller and may feel more comfortable in hand.
Weight (g)199193Negligible weight difference.
BuildMissingMissingBuild quality and materials cannot be compared.
Display
Display Size (inches)6.66.71Redmi A3x has a slightly larger display.
Resolution1080 x 2340720 x 1650A34 has a significantly sharper display (390 ppi vs 268 ppi), resulting in clearer text and images.
Display TypeSuper AMOLED, 120HzIPS LCD, 90HzA34's AMOLED offers more vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency. The higher refresh rate (120Hz) provides smoother animations and scrolling compared to the 90Hz on the Redmi A3x.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)Unisoc T603 (22 nm)A34's Dimensity 1080 is significantly more powerful and power-efficient due to the smaller manufacturing process (6nm vs 22nm). This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core 1.8 GHzA34 has a more powerful CPU architecture with higher clock speeds, leading to better overall performance.
GPUMali-G68 MC4Mali-G57 MP1A34 boasts a significantly more capable GPU, enabling smoother gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.
RAM6GB/8GB3GB/4GBA34 offers more RAM, improving multitasking and reducing app closures.
Camera
Rear Camera48MP (Main) + 8MP (Ultrawide) + 5MP (Macro) + 5MP (Depth)8MP (Main) + 0.1MP (Unknown)A34 has a more versatile camera setup with a higher resolution main sensor and dedicated ultrawide and macro lenses. The 0.1MP secondary sensor on the Redmi A3x is likely of limited practical use.
Front Camera13MP5MPA34 has a higher resolution selfie camera.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@30fpsUp to 1080p@30fpsA34 can record higher resolution videos.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity.
Fast Charging25W10WA34 supports significantly faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A34 Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The Dimensity 1080 chipset, coupled with more RAM, provides a much smoother and faster user experience.
  • Superior display: The AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate offers vibrant colors, deep blacks, and smooth scrolling.
  • More versatile camera system: Higher resolution sensors, ultrawide lens, and 4K video recording capabilities.
  • Faster charging: 25W fast charging significantly reduces charging time.
  • NFC for contactless payments: A significant convenience feature missing on the Redmi A3x.

Xiaomi Redmi A3x Advantages:

  • Lower price: Significantly more affordable.
  • Slightly larger display: Offers a marginally larger viewing area.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A34: Users who prioritize performance, display quality, camera versatility, and overall user experience. Suitable for gaming, media consumption, photography, and multitasking.

Xiaomi Redmi A3x: Budget-conscious users who primarily need a basic smartphone for calling, texting, and light web browsing. Not recommended for demanding tasks or users who value a high-quality display or camera.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi A3x is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? For demanding tasks, the A34 is essential.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Prioritize performance, display, camera, or battery life accordingly.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A34

The Samsung Galaxy A34 is the clear winner for me. While the Redmi A3x offers a lower price, the compromises in performance, display, camera, and features are too significant. The A34 provides a vastly superior user experience with its powerful chipset, vibrant AMOLED display, versatile camera system, and faster charging. The price difference is justified by the significant leap in quality and features. The inclusion of NFC also adds significant value for everyday convenience. Even if on a tighter budget, I would consider saving longer for the A34 or looking for a used/refurbished model to avoid the significant compromises of the Redmi A3x.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.