Samsung Galaxy A34 vs Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 January 12, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 103.3 cm³ 96.66 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.32 "/g 3.73 "/g
Weight 199 g 179 g
Height 161.3 mm 161.1 mm
Width 78.1 mm 75 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 88.9 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 1300 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.4 mAh/cm³ 51.73 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A34Xiaomi Poco M6 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2161.1 x 75 x 8Poco M6 Pro is slightly narrower and thinner. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)199179Poco M6 Pro is noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use and reducing pocket bulk.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.67Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution (pixels)1080 x 23401080 x 2400Virtually identical sharpness.
TypeSuper AMOLEDAMOLEDA34's Super AMOLED likely offers better color accuracy, contrast, and outdoor visibility.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)1000 (HBM)1000 (HBM), 1300 (peak)Poco M6 Pro may be slightly more readable in direct sunlight due to higher peak brightness.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)Mediatek Helio G99 UltraDimensity 1080 generally offers better performance in demanding tasks and gaming due to its superior GPU.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)A34 has a slight edge in CPU performance due to faster clock speeds and more powerful cores.
GPUMali-G68 MC4Mali-G57 MC2A34's GPU provides significantly better graphics performance for gaming and visually intensive applications.
RAM (GB)6/88/12More RAM in Poco M6 Pro (in certain variants) enables better multitasking and app switching.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)4864Poco M6 Pro boasts higher resolution, potentially capturing more detail. However, sensor size and image processing are crucial for overall image quality.
Video Recording4K@30fps1080p@60fpsA34 offers 4K video recording, while Poco M6 Pro is limited to 1080p. A34's slow-motion capabilities are also superior (480fps vs 240fps).
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery life expected.
Fast Charging (W)2567Poco M6 Pro charges significantly faster, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A34 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Dimensity 1080 and Mali-G68 MC4 offer a noticeable performance advantage, especially for gaming and demanding applications.
  • Better Display Quality: Super AMOLED generally delivers richer colors and deeper blacks compared to standard AMOLED.
  • Higher Resolution Video Recording: 4K recording capability provides more detailed videos.

Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro Advantages:

  • Faster Charging: 67W fast charging significantly reduces charging time compared to 25W.
  • Lighter Weight: Noticeably lighter, improving handling comfort.
  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: Potentially captures more detailed photos, although overall image quality depends on other factors.
  • Potentially Lower Price: Depending on the specific RAM/storage configuration, the Poco M6 Pro might offer a lower entry price.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A34: Users who prioritize performance, display quality, and video recording capabilities. Suitable for mobile gaming, media consumption, and content creation.

Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro: Users who value fast charging, a lightweight design, and a high-resolution main camera. Ideal for users who prioritize quick charging and general everyday use.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget and desired storage capacity?
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns (gaming, photography, social media, etc.)?
  3. How important is fast charging to you?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamer: Samsung Galaxy A34 for its superior performance.
  • Photography Enthusiast: While Poco M6 Pro has a higher resolution main camera, more information (sensor size, aperture, image processing capabilities) is needed for a conclusive recommendation. Consider A34 if 4K video is crucial.
  • On-the-Go User: Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro for its fast charging and lighter weight.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A34

While the Poco M6 Pro offers appealing features like faster charging and a lighter build, the Samsung Galaxy A34's superior performance and display quality are more significant factors for me. The Dimensity 1080 provides a smoother and more responsive user experience, particularly in demanding tasks and games. The Super AMOLED display is also likely to offer better visuals for media consumption. The 4K video recording is another significant advantage. While 25W charging is slower, I prioritize overall performance and visual quality over slightly faster charging times. The slightly heavier weight is a negligible trade-off for these advantages.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.