Samsung Galaxy A34 vs Xiaomi Poco M6 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 June 13, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 103.3 cm³ 106.77 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.32 "/g 3.31 "/g
Weight 199 g 205 g
Height 161.3 mm 168.6 mm
Width 78.1 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.79 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2460
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 85.1 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits 550 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 109.10 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.4 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5030 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) Mediatek Helio G91 Ultra (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A34Xiaomi Poco M6 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2168.6 x 76.3 x 8.3Poco M6 is slightly larger and heavier.
Weight (g)199205Negligible weight difference in real-world usage.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality and materials impact durability and premium feel; information lacking here.
Display
Display TypeSuper AMOLEDIPS LCDAMOLED offers deeper blacks, vibrant colors, and potentially better power efficiency.
Size (inches)6.66.79Poco M6 has a slightly larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution1080 x 23401080 x 2460Similar sharpness due to comparable pixel densities.
Refresh Rate (Hz)12090A34's 120Hz offers smoother scrolling and animations.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)Mediatek Helio G91 Ultra (12 nm)Dimensity 1080 is generally more powerful and efficient due to smaller fabrication process. Expect better performance in demanding tasks and games on the A34.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)A34 has faster and more modern CPU cores, resulting in snappier performance.
GPUMali-G68 MC4Mali-G52 MC2A34's GPU is significantly more powerful, leading to better gaming and graphics performance.
RAM6/8 GB6/8 GBBoth offer sufficient RAM for multitasking, though specific configurations need clarification.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)48108Poco M6 boasts higher resolution, but image quality depends on sensor size and processing.
Ultrawide (MP)5Not specifiedA34 offers an ultrawide lens for broader perspectives, not confirmed for the Poco M6.
Video Recording4K@30fps1080p@30fpsA34 supports higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005030Negligible difference in battery capacity.
Fast Charging25W33WPoco M6 offers faster charging speeds.
OSAndroid 13Android 14Poco M6 ships with a newer Android version out of the box, offering potential feature and security advantages.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A34 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED technology offers vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Higher refresh rate provides smoother scrolling.
  • Better Performance: More powerful chipset and GPU result in smoother gaming and multitasking.
  • More Versatile Camera System: Includes an ultrawide lens and 4K video recording.

Xiaomi Poco M6 4G Advantages:

  • Larger Display: Slightly bigger screen for more immersive content.
  • Faster Charging: 33W charging tops up the battery quicker than A34's 25W.
  • Lower Price: Positioned in a lower price bracket.
  • Newer Android Version: Ships with Android 14, potentially offering newer features and longer software support.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A34: Suited for users who prioritize display quality, performance, and camera versatility. Ideal for gaming, media consumption, and general use.

Xiaomi Poco M6 4G: Best for budget-conscious users who prioritize a large screen and fast charging. Suitable for casual gaming, social media, and everyday tasks. Those seeking the latest Android version might also prefer this.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco M6 is more affordable.
  2. What are your performance needs? The A34 offers superior processing power for demanding tasks.
  3. Which display technology do you prefer? AMOLED offers richer visuals while IPS LCDs are often brighter in direct sunlight. Consider which is more important to your viewing habits.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamer: A34 for better performance.
  • Heavy Media Consumer: A34 for the superior display.
  • Budget-Conscious User: Poco M6 for affordability.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A34

While the Poco M6 offers a compelling value proposition with its large screen and fast charging at a lower price, the Samsung Galaxy A34 is the better overall device for my needs. The superior AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, coupled with the significantly more powerful processor and GPU, makes a tangible difference in daily use and especially for demanding tasks like gaming. The inclusion of an ultrawide lens also enhances photographic versatility. While Android 14 on the Poco M6 is attractive, Samsung's track record of software updates and the performance gap are decisive factors in my choice. The price difference is justifiable for the significant upgrade in user experience offered by the A34.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.