Samsung Galaxy A34 vs Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 May 23, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 103.3 cm³ 98.95 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.32 "/g 3.19 "/g
Weight 199 g 209 g
Height 161.3 mm 160.9 mm
Width 78.1 mm 75 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Black
  • White

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1440 x 3200
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 89 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 526 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 700 nits
HBM Brightness 1000 nits 1200 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 4000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.4 mAh/cm³ 50.53 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Adreno 740

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A34Xiaomi Poco F6 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2160.9 x 75 x 8.2Poco F6 Pro is slightly narrower and potentially more comfortable for one-handed use.
Weight (g)199209Negligible weight difference in real-world usage.
Display
Display Size (inches)6.66.67Poco F6 Pro offers marginally larger screen real estate.
Resolution (px)1080 x 23401440 x 3200Significantly sharper and more detailed visuals on the Poco F6 Pro due to higher resolution (QHD+ vs FHD+).
Display TypeSuper AMOLED, 120HzAMOLED, 120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations thanks to 120Hz. Poco F6 Pro boasts higher peak brightness (4000 nits vs 1000 nits) for better outdoor visibility and HDR10+/Dolby Vision support for superior dynamic range in supported content.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the Poco F6 Pro offers significantly better CPU and GPU performance, leading to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and superior gaming capabilities.
RAM (GB)6/812/16More RAM in Poco F6 Pro enables better multitasking and reduces app closures in the background.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)4850While both offer high megapixel counts, image quality depends on sensor size, processing, and other factors. Poco F6 Pro has a slightly larger sensor (1/1.55\" vs 1/2\") potentially capturing more light.
Video Recording4K@30fps8K@24fpsPoco F6 Pro allows for higher resolution video recording.
Slow Motion720p@480fps720p@1920fpsPoco F6 Pro offers significantly slower slow-motion capture.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacities suggest comparable battery life, although real-world usage may vary depending on other factors like display and processor efficiency.
Fast Charging (W)25120Significantly faster charging on the Poco F6 Pro.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A34 Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: Typically positioned in a more affordable segment.
  • More Color Options: Offers a wider variety of color choices.
  • Proven Reliability: Samsung's track record for software updates and device longevity.

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster processor and more RAM.
  • Brighter and Sharper Display: Higher resolution, peak brightness, and HDR support.
  • Faster Charging: 120W fast charging dramatically reduces charging time.
  • Higher Resolution Video Recording: Offers up to 8K video recording.

Trade-offs:

  • Price: Poco F6 Pro is more expensive.
  • Brand Recognition and Software Support: Samsung generally has wider brand recognition and potentially longer software support compared to Poco.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A34: Ideal for budget-conscious users prioritizing essential smartphone features like calling, messaging, social media, and light gaming.

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro: Suitable for power users, gamers, and content creators who demand top-tier performance, a brilliant display, and fast charging.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget?
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns?
  3. How important are factors like performance, display quality, and charging speed?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Basic Usage: Samsung Galaxy A34
  • Demanding User, High Performance Needs: Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
  • Balanced Needs, Value Seeker: Consider the price difference and prioritize features based on individual needs.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro

While I acknowledge the potential price difference and Samsung's reputation for long-term software updates, the Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro is my choice. The significant leap in performance offered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, coupled with the stunning QHD+ AMOLED display with HDR10+/Dolby Vision, significantly elevates the user experience. The 120W fast charging is a game-changer for my lifestyle, minimizing downtime. As someone who values a smooth and responsive user interface, demanding applications, and high-quality media consumption, the Poco F6 Pro's superior hardware outweighs the potential drawbacks for me. The future-proofing offered by the advanced processor and ample RAM also ensures the phone remains relevant for a longer period.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.