Samsung Galaxy A34 vs vivo X100 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 November 21, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 103.3 cm³ 109.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.32 "/g 3.07 "/g
Weight 199 g 221 g
Height 161.3 mm 164.1 mm
Width 78.1 mm 75.3 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • White
  • Sunset Orange
  • Startrail Blue
  • Asteroid Black

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 89.8 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 452 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 117.47 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.4 mAh/cm³ 49.1 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5400 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Immortalis-G720 MC12

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17 15

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A34vivo X100 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2164.1 x 75.3 x 8.9X100 Pro slightly taller and thicker. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)199221A34 noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Display Size (inches)6.66.78X100 Pro offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution (px)1080 x 23401260 x 2800X100 Pro significantly sharper display, noticeable in text clarity and image detail.
Display TypeSuper AMOLED, 120HzLTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, 1B colors, HDR10+X100 Pro boasts superior display technology: LTPO for better power efficiency, 1 Billion colors for smoother gradients, HDR10+ for enhanced dynamic range in supported content.
Peak Brightness (nits)10003000X100 Pro far brighter, ensuring excellent outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm)X100 Pro features a more powerful and efficient chipset, leading to smoother performance, faster app loading, and better battery life.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)X100 Pro has a significantly more powerful CPU architecture, resulting in much better performance for demanding tasks and multitasking.
GPUMali-G68 MC4Immortalis-G720 MC12X100 Pro's GPU is considerably more powerful, providing a superior gaming experience and smoother graphics rendering.
RAM6/8 GB16 GBX100 Pro offers significantly more RAM, enabling better multitasking and preventing app closures in the background.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)4850While both have high megapixel counts, the X100 Pro uses a larger 1-inch Sony IMX989 sensor, resulting in significantly better low-light performance and dynamic range.
DxOMark Score92150X100 Pro scores much higher in DxOMark tests, indicating superior overall camera quality.
Video Capabilities4K@30fps8K@30fpsX100 Pro capable of recording higher resolution video.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005400X100 Pro has a slightly larger battery.
Fast Charging (W)25100X100 Pro charges significantly faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A34 Advantages:

  • Lighter and more affordable: Easier to handle and less expensive.
  • Good enough performance for everyday tasks: Suitable for casual users.

vivo X100 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly superior performance: Handles demanding tasks and gaming with ease.
  • Top-tier display: Brighter, sharper, and more color accurate.
  • Flagship camera system: Excellent image quality, especially in low light.
  • Faster Charging: Significantly reduces downtime.

Trade-offs:

  • Price: The vivo X100 Pro is considerably more expensive.
  • Weight: The X100 Pro is heavier due to its larger battery and advanced camera system.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A34: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality and affordability for everyday tasks like social media, browsing, and casual photography.

vivo X100 Pro: Users who demand top-tier performance, a premium display, and a flagship camera experience. Ideal for mobile gamers, photography enthusiasts, and power users.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget?
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns?
  3. How important are camera quality, display quality, and performance to you?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Basic Usage: Samsung Galaxy A34
  • Demanding User, High Budget: vivo X100 Pro

My Choice: vivo X100 Pro

While significantly more expensive, the vivo X100 Pro offers a substantial upgrade in every aspect. The superior display, significantly faster performance powered by the Dimensity 9300 and ample RAM, and the flagship-level camera with its larger sensor make it a compelling device. The faster charging is a significant advantage in my fast-paced life. While the A34 is a good budget option, the X100 Pro's advantages justify the price premium for me as a power user who values a premium mobile experience. I often use my phone for demanding tasks, photography, and occasional gaming, making the X100 Pro a better fit for my needs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.