Samsung Galaxy A34 vs vivo X100 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
vivo X100
vivo X100
Vivo

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 November 21, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 103.3 cm³ 104.89 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.32 "/g 3.36 "/g
Weight 199 g 202 g
Height 161.3 mm 164.1 mm
Width 78.1 mm 75.2 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • White
  • Orange
  • Startrail Blue
  • Asteroid Black

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 89.9 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 452 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 108.77 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.4 mAh/cm³ 47.67 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Immortalis-G720 MC12

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A34vivo X100Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2164.1 x 75.2 x 8.5Vivo X100 is slightly larger and thicker.
Weight (g)199202Negligible weight difference in real-world usage.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.78Vivo X100 offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution (px)1080 x 23401260 x 2800Vivo X100 has a sharper display with higher pixel density, resulting in clearer text and images.
TypeSuper AMOLEDLTPO AMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. Vivo X100's LTPO panel allows for dynamic refresh rate adjustment, potentially saving battery.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)1000 (HBM)3000Vivo X100 is significantly brighter, making it more usable in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm)Vivo X100 boasts a more powerful and efficient processor, leading to better performance and potentially longer battery life.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)Vivo X100's CPU architecture suggests a significant performance advantage in demanding tasks and multitasking.
GPUMali-G68 MC4Immortalis-G720 MC12Vivo X100's GPU is expected to deliver superior gaming and graphics performance.
RAM (GB)6/812/16Vivo X100 offers significantly more RAM, enabling smoother multitasking and better handling of demanding applications.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)4850Both offer high-resolution main cameras. Vivo utilizes a larger sensor (1/1.31" vs 1/2"). This allows for better low-light performance and depth of field.
Ultrawide (MP)550Vivo X100 has a much higher resolution ultrawide, capturing more detail.
Telephoto (MP)N/A64Vivo X100 offers optical zoom capabilities, absent in the A34.
Video Capabilities4K@30fps, 1080p@60fpsMissing InformationCannot compare video capabilities without Vivo X100's specifics.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacities.
Fast Charging (W)25120Vivo X100 charges significantly faster, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A34 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Expected to be more affordable.

vivo X100 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly more powerful processor and GPU, more RAM.
  • Better Display: Larger, sharper, brighter, and more power-efficient with LTPO technology.
  • Enhanced Camera System: Higher resolution sensors, including a dedicated telephoto lens with optical zoom, larger main sensor.
  • Faster Charging: Significantly faster charging speeds.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A34: Budget-conscious users prioritizing basic smartphone functionality, casual social media use, and light gaming.

vivo X100: Users seeking a premium experience with top-tier performance, excellent camera capabilities, a vibrant display, and fast charging. Ideal for mobile gamers, photography enthusiasts, and power users.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The A34 offers better value for its price.
  2. What are your performance needs? The X100 excels for demanding tasks and gaming.
  3. How important is camera quality? The X100 offers a significantly more versatile and capable camera system.

My Choice: vivo X100

While the Samsung Galaxy A34 is a solid budget option, the vivo X100 offers a significant upgrade in performance, display, and camera capabilities. The faster charging is a huge bonus as well. Although the price is higher, the substantial improvements across the board make the vivo X100 a more compelling device for my needs, assuming a moderate budget that prioritizes performance and features. I value a smooth user experience, excellent photography capabilities, and a bright, responsive display, all of which the X100 delivers.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.