Samsung Galaxy A34 vs Samsung Galaxy A55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 103.3 cm³ 102.25 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.32 "/g 3.1 "/g
Weight 199 g 213 g
Height 161.3 mm 161.1 mm
Width 78.1 mm 77.4 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 85.8 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.4 mAh/cm³ 48.9 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) Exynos 1480 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Xclipse 530

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A34Samsung Galaxy A55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2Virtually identical dimensions; negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight (g)199213A55 is slightly heavier, but the difference is unlikely to be noticeable in everyday use.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.6Same screen size.
Resolution (pixels)1080 x 23401080 x 2340Identical resolution; sharpness and clarity will be the same.
TypeSuper AMOLED, 120HzSuper AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+Both offer smooth scrolling and vivid colors thanks to AMOLED and 120Hz. A55 supports HDR10+ for a wider dynamic range in compatible content, resulting in better visuals.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)Exynos 1480 (4 nm)A55's 4nm process suggests better power efficiency and potentially improved performance over A34's 6nm chipset.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)A55 has faster and more powerful cores, leading to noticeably better performance in demanding tasks and multitasking.
GPUMali-G68 MC4Xclipse 530A55's GPU is expected to offer superior graphics performance, beneficial for gaming and visually intensive applications. Direct comparison is difficult without benchmark data.
RAM6/8 GB8/12 GBA55 offers more RAM in higher-end configurations, allowing for better multitasking and smoother performance with multiple apps open.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)4850A55's slightly higher resolution main camera may offer marginally better detail. More significant is the sensor difference (IMX582 vs. IMX906), with the IMX906 in the A55 generally considered superior in low light and overall image quality.
Selfie Camera (MP)1332A55's significantly higher resolution selfie camera will produce much more detailed self-portraits.
Video Recording4K@30fps4K@30fps with EISBoth offer 4K recording, but A55 features Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) for smoother video footage.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Same battery capacity; expected similar battery life, though A55's more efficient processor could provide a slight edge.
Charging25W Fast Charging25W Fast ChargingIdentical charging speeds.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A55 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Exynos 1480 (4nm) chipset, faster CPU cores, and more RAM options offer a significant performance advantage over the Galaxy A34, making it better for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Improved Camera System: The A55 boasts a better main camera sensor (IMX906), a higher resolution selfie camera, and Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) for video recording.
  • HDR10+ Display: Support for HDR10+ provides a wider dynamic range and better visual experience when viewing compatible content.
  • Software Updates: Launched with a newer Android version and guaranteed longer updates, ensuring feature support and security patches for a longer period.

Samsung Galaxy A34 Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: As an older model, the A34 might be available at a lower price point.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A55: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a good camera, and long-term software support. Suitable for gaming, content creation, and multitasking.

Samsung Galaxy A34: Best for budget-conscious users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and light photography.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The A34 likely offers better value if price is a primary concern.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? For demanding tasks, the A55's performance advantage is crucial. For basic use, the A34 is sufficient.
  3. How important are camera quality and software updates? The A55 offers notable improvements in both areas.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A55

While the price difference might be significant, the Samsung Galaxy A55 offers a substantial upgrade in performance, camera quality, and display technology. The more efficient processor and longer software support also contribute to a better long-term ownership experience. For me, these improvements outweigh the potential cost savings of the A34. The A55 provides a more future-proof device that can handle demanding tasks and deliver a better overall user experience. The superior camera is also a deciding factor for capturing high-quality photos and videos.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.