Samsung Galaxy A34 vs Samsung Galaxy A35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 103.3 cm³ 103.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.32 "/g 3.16 "/g
Weight 199 g 209 g
Height 161.3 mm 161.7 mm
Width 78.1 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 84.8 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.4 mAh/cm³ 48.34 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A34Samsung Galaxy A35Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2161.7 x 78 x 8.2Virtually identical dimensions, negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight (g)199209A35 is slightly heavier, but the difference (10g) is unlikely to be noticeable.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.6Same screen size.
Resolution (px)1080 x 23401080 x 2340Same resolution, sharpness, and viewing experience.
TypeSuper AMOLED, 120HzSuper AMOLED, 120HzBoth offer vibrant colors, deep blacks, and smooth scrolling thanks to the 120Hz refresh rate.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)Exynos 1380 (5 nm)A35's 5nm Exynos 1380 should offer better performance and power efficiency compared to the A34's 6nm Dimensity 1080.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)The A35 boasts a slightly faster CPU configuration, likely resulting in smoother multitasking and app loading.
GPUMali-G68 MC4Mali-G68 MP5The A35 has a more powerful GPU, translating to improved gaming performance and graphics rendering.
RAM (GB)6/86/8Both offer similar RAM options, impacting multitasking capabilities. More RAM generally allows for smoother performance with multiple open apps.
OSAndroid 13Android 14A35 launches with a newer Android version, offering potential feature and security advantages. Also, longer software support is likely.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)4850A35 has a slightly higher resolution main sensor.
DxOMark Score92104Significantly higher DxOMark score for the A35 suggests superior overall camera quality, including photo and video performance.
Video Capabilities4K@30fps4K@30fps with EISBoth can record 4K video, but A35 features Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) at 4K, resulting in smoother footage.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity, expected similar battery life, though real-world usage will depend on the efficiency of the chipset and software.
Charging (W)25W25WSame fast charging speed.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A35 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The newer Exynos 1380 (5nm) chipset provides better performance and power efficiency compared to the Dimensity 1080. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and potentially longer battery life.
  • Improved Camera: Higher DxOMark score (104 vs 92) and EIS at 4K resolution indicate better image and video quality.
  • Newer Software: Launching with Android 14, the A35 benefits from the latest features and security updates, as well as likely longer software support.
  • Faster CPU: The A35's CPU configuration suggests faster processing capabilities.

Samsung Galaxy A34 Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: As an older model, the A34 might be available at a lower price point.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A35: Suitable for users who prioritize performance, camera quality, and the latest software features. Ideal for:

  • Mobile Gamers: The more powerful GPU will deliver a better gaming experience.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: The improved camera system will produce higher-quality photos and videos.
  • Power Users: Those who demand smooth multitasking and fast app loading times will appreciate the superior performance.

Samsung Galaxy A34: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize essential features and reliable performance. Ideal for:

  • Casual Users: Those primarily using their phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and social media.
  • Budget-Minded Buyers: The A34 offers good value for its price, especially if found on discount.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The A34 might be significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? Gaming, photography, or general use?
  3. How important are the latest software features and performance?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight Budget: Choose the Galaxy A34.
  • Best Value: The A35 likely offers better value due to the significant performance and camera improvements, assuming the price difference isn't substantial.
  • Focus on Performance and Camera: Choose the Galaxy A35.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A35

While lacking specific pricing information, the Samsung Galaxy A35 is the superior device based on the provided specifications. The Exynos 1380 offers a noticeable performance advantage over the Dimensity 1080, resulting in smoother overall usage and better gaming capabilities. The improved camera system, evidenced by the significantly higher DxOMark score and the inclusion of 4K video with EIS, is another compelling reason. Finally, the newer Android version ensures access to the latest features and longer-term software support. While the A34 is a solid option for budget-conscious buyers, the A35's advancements justify the likely price premium for most users.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.