Samsung Galaxy A34 vs Realme C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C65
Realme C65
Realme

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 April 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 103.3 cm³ 95.2 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.32 "/g 3.61 "/g
Weight 199 g 185 g
Height 161.3 mm 164.6 mm
Width 78.1 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Purple Nebula
  • Black Milky Way

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 720 x 1604
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 264 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness 1000 nits 625 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.4 mAh/cm³ 52.52 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A34Realme C65Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2164.6 x 76.1 x 7.6A34 slightly shorter and narrower, C65 slightly thinner. Negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight (g)199185C65 slightly lighter, but the difference is minimal.
BuildUnspecifiedUnspecifiedBuild quality and materials unknown, impacting durability and premium feel.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.67Negligible size difference.
Resolution1080 x 2340720 x 1604A34 significantly sharper due to much higher resolution, resulting in clearer text and images. C65's lower resolution might appear pixelated.
Panel TypeSuper AMOLEDIPS LCDA34's AMOLED offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency in dark mode.
Refresh Rate (Hz)12090A34 offers smoother scrolling and animations due to the higher refresh rate.
Peak Brightness (nits)1000 (HBM)625 (HBM)A34 will be significantly more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1080 (6nm)Mediatek Helio G85 (12nm)A34's 1080 is more powerful and efficient due to the smaller manufacturing process node. Expect better performance and battery life in the A34.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.6 GHz A78 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)A34 has faster and more modern CPU cores, leading to noticeable performance improvements in demanding tasks and multitasking.
GPUMali-G68 MC4Mali-G52 MC2A34's GPU is significantly more powerful, enabling smoother gaming and faster graphics rendering.
RAM6/8GB6/8GBBoth offer comparable RAM options, impacting multitasking capabilities.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)4850While C65 has slightly higher megapixel count, sensor size and other factors influence image quality more significantly. A34 uses a proven Sony sensor.
Ultrawide (MP)5N/AA34 offers ultrawide photography, enabling wider field of view shots.
Other CamerasDepth sensor, Selfie 13MPDepth sensor, Selfie 8MPA34 boasts a higher resolution selfie camera.
Video Recording4K@30fps1080p@30fpsA34 capable of recording higher resolution video.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Both have the same battery capacity. However, A34's more efficient chipset likely results in longer real-world battery life.
Fast Charging25W45WC65 offers significantly faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A34 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: Sharper, brighter, and more vibrant AMOLED with a faster refresh rate.
  • Better Performance: More powerful and efficient processor and GPU for smoother operation and gaming.
  • More Versatile Camera System: Includes an ultrawide lens and a higher resolution selfie camera.
  • Longer Battery Life (Expected): Due to more efficient chipset.

Realme C65 Advantages:

  • Faster Charging: Significantly faster charging speed.
  • Slightly Lower Price: Based on provided pricing data.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A34: Ideal for users who prioritize display quality, performance, camera versatility, and overall user experience. Suitable for:

  • Media consumption: Watching videos, browsing photos.
  • Mobile gaming: Playing demanding games.
  • Photography enthusiasts: Capturing various shots, including ultrawide and high-quality selfies.

Realme C65: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize fast charging and basic smartphone functionality. Suitable for:

  • Casual users: Primarily using for calls, messaging, and social media.
  • Users needing quick top-ups: Benefitting from the faster charging speed.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Realme C65 is generally more affordable.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Heavy users will appreciate the A34's performance and display.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Prioritize display, performance and camera - A34. Prioritize fast charging and price - C65.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A34

While the Realme C65 offers faster charging and a lower price, the Samsung Galaxy A34 provides a significantly better overall user experience. The superior display, more powerful performance, versatile camera system, and expected longer battery life outweigh the C65's advantages for me. I value a smooth and enjoyable user experience over slightly faster charging, and I am willing to pay a bit more for the significant upgrades the A34 offers. The A34's sharper display, smoother performance, and better camera make it a more compelling device for my needs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.