Samsung Galaxy A34 vs Nothing Phone (2a) Plus - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 August 3, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 103.3 cm³ 104.87 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.32 "/g 3.53 "/g
Weight 199 g 190 g
Height 161.3 mm 161.7 mm
Width 78.1 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Black
  • Grey

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 87.6 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 700 nits
HBM Brightness 1000 nits 1100 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 1300 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.4 mAh/cm³ 47.68 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7350 Pro (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G610 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A34Nothing Phone (2a) PlusPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2161.7 x 76.3 x 8.5Virtually identical in hand feel.
Weight (g)199190Negligible weight difference.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.7Slightly larger screen on the Nothing Phone.
Resolution (px)1080 x 23401080 x 2412Similar sharpness; both are crisp.
TypeSuper AMOLED, 120HzAMOLED, 120Hz, 1B colors, HDR10+Nothing Phone boasts a wider color gamut (1B colors) and HDR10+ for superior visual experience in supported content. Samsung's Super AMOLED might offer deeper blacks.
Peak Brightness (nits)1000 (HBM)1300 (peak)Nothing Phone can get significantly brighter, improving outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7350 Pro (4 nm)While both are mid-range chips, the Dimensity 1080 in the A34 generally benchmarks slightly higher in CPU tasks. The 4nm process in the Nothing Phone could mean better power efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)More efficient core architecture on the Nothing phone (A715 vs A78), but practical performance differences might be minor in everyday tasks.
GPUMali-G68 MC4Mali-G610 MC4The Mali-G68 in the A34 should offer slightly better gaming performance.
RAM6/8GB12GBSignificantly more RAM in the Nothing Phone enables better multitasking and app retention.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)4850Both are capable sensors; image quality will depend more on software processing.
Ultrawide (MP)850Wider field of view on the A34. Higher resolution ultrawide on the Nothing Phone potentially offers better detail.
Selfie (MP)1332Significantly higher resolution selfie camera on the Nothing Phone.
Video4K@30fps4K@30fpsComparable video resolution. Nothing phone advertises EIS (Electronic Image Stabilization) at 4K.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity.
Charging (W)2550Significantly faster charging on the Nothing Phone. However, the Nothing Phone doesn't include a charger.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A34 Advantages:

  • Potentially Slightly Faster CPU Performance: Benchmark results suggest a performance edge for the A34 in CPU intensive tasks.
  • Wider Ultrawide Lens: Captures more expansive scenes.
  • Lower Price: Generally more affordable.

Nothing Phone (2a) Plus Advantages:

  • Superior Display: HDR10+, 1B colors, and higher peak brightness deliver a richer visual experience.
  • More RAM: 12GB ensures smoother multitasking and less frequent app reloading.
  • Faster Charging: 50W charging significantly reduces downtime. (Charger not included.)
  • Higher Resolution Selfie Camera: Better for video calls and self-portraits.
  • More Modern CPU Architecture: The newer Cortex-A715 cores are designed for better power efficiency.

Trade-offs:

  • Nothing Phone Price: The Nothing Phone is notably more expensive. Users must decide if the enhanced features justify the higher cost.
  • Charger: The Nothing Phone doesn't come with a charger in the box.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A34:

  • Budget-conscious users: Prioritize affordability.
  • Light to moderate users: Primarily use their phone for basic tasks (calling, texting, social media).

Nothing Phone (2a) Plus:

  • Power users: Demand smooth multitasking and ample RAM.
  • Content consumers: Value a high-quality display for watching videos and playing games.
  • Photography enthusiasts: Appreciate the high-resolution selfie camera and improved image stabilization.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The price difference is significant.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? Light users might not need the extra power of the Nothing Phone.
  3. How important is display quality and charging speed? These are areas where the Nothing Phone excels.

My Choice: Nothing Phone (2a) Plus

While the Samsung Galaxy A34 is a solid and affordable option, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus offers a superior overall user experience due to its exceptional display, ample RAM for future-proofing, faster charging, and higher resolution selfie camera. The more modern, power-efficient CPU architecture is also appealing. The price premium is justifiable for the noticeable improvements in daily usage, especially for media consumption and multitasking. I am willing to purchase a separate fast charger.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.