Samsung Galaxy A34 vs Motorola Moto G55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 September 6, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 103.3 cm³ 96.6 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.32 "/g 3.63 "/g
Weight 199 g 179 g
Height 161.3 mm 161.6 mm
Width 78.1 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Forest Grey
  • Smoky Green
  • Twilight Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.49 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 85.3 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 118.71 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.4 mAh/cm³ 51.76 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 IMG BXM-8-256

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A34Motorola Moto G55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2161.6 x 73.8 x 8.1A34 slightly shorter and wider, negligible difference in thickness.
Weight (g)199179G55 noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use.
Fingerprint SensorUnder-displaySide-mountedPersonal preference, both reliable. Side-mounted might be faster to unlock.
Display
Display TypeSuper AMOLED, 120HzIPS LCD, 120HzA34 offers more vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and better outdoor visibility due to AMOLED technology. Both have smooth scrolling thanks to 120Hz.
Size (inches)6.66.49Negligible size difference.
Resolution1080 x 23401080 x 2400Similar sharpness.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1080Mediatek Dimensity 70251080 generally performs slightly better in benchmarks, translating to potentially faster app loading and multitasking.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.6 GHz A78 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz A78 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)Minor CPU clock speed difference, unlikely to significantly impact daily use.
GPUMali-G68 MC4IMG BXM-8-256Mali-G68 MC4 generally offers better gaming performance.
RAM6/8GB8GBG55 offers more RAM in the compared variant, benefiting multitasking and demanding apps.
Camera
Rear Camera48MP Main, 8MP Ultrawide, 5MP Macro, 5MP Depth50MP Main, 8MP UltrawideResolution difference in the main sensor might not translate to significantly better image quality. Lack of detailed sensor information for the G55 limits in-depth comparison.
Front Camera13MP16MPHigher resolution on G55, potentially better selfies.
Video Recording4K@30fps1080p@60fpsA34 offers 4K recording for higher resolution videos, G55 limited to 1080p but with smoother 60fps.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery life expected.
Fast Charging25W30WG55 charges faster.
OtherReverse ChargingG55 can charge other devices wirelessly.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A34 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED provides richer colors and better contrast.
  • Slightly Better Performance: Dimensity 1080 and Mali-G68 MC4 offer a performance edge, especially for gaming.
  • 4K Video Recording: Captures higher resolution video.

Motorola Moto G55 Advantages:

  • Lighter Weight: More comfortable for extended use.
  • Faster Charging: 30W charging reduces downtime.
  • More RAM: 8GB RAM enhances multitasking performance in the provided variant.
  • Reverse Charging: Can charge other devices.

Trade-offs:

  • A34: Slightly heavier, slower charging.
  • G55: LCD display, potentially less powerful GPU, no 4K video recording.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A34: Users who prioritize display quality, gaming performance, and recording high-resolution videos. Suitable for media consumption, mobile gaming, and content creation.

Motorola Moto G55: Users who value a lightweight phone, faster charging, and robust multitasking capabilities. Suitable for everyday use, social media, and light gaming. The reverse charging feature is useful for charging accessories on the go.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Is display quality a top priority? If yes, the A34's AMOLED screen is a significant advantage.
  2. How important is gaming performance? The A34 likely offers a smoother gaming experience.
  3. Is faster charging or reverse charging crucial? If yes, the G55 is the better choice.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A34

While the Motorola Moto G55 offers advantages in weight, charging speed, and RAM, the Samsung Galaxy A34's superior AMOLED display and more powerful GPU are decisive factors for me. I prioritize screen quality and smooth performance, especially for gaming and media consumption. The slightly slower charging is a minor inconvenience I'm willing to accept for the overall better visual experience and potential performance gains. The A34 also offers 4K video recording, a feature I find valuable. While the G55 has reverse wireless charging, I don't often need to charge other devices with my phone, making it less of a priority. Ultimately, the A34 provides a more compelling overall package for my needs and preferences.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.