Samsung Galaxy A34 vs Motorola Moto G24 Power - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 February 7, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 103.3 cm³ 109.63 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.32 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 199 g 197 g
Height 161.3 mm 163.5 mm
Width 78.1 mm 74.5 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Glacier Blue
  • Ink Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.56 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 269 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 537 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 139.43 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.4 mAh/cm³ 54.73 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A34Motorola Moto G24 PowerPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2163.5 x 74.5 x 9A34 is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight (g)199197Negligible weight difference.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality.
Display
Display TypeSuper AMOLEDIPS LCDA34 offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better outdoor visibility.
Display Size (inches)6.66.56Negligible size difference.
Resolution1080 x 2340720 x 1612A34 has a significantly sharper display.
Refresh Rate (Hz)12090A34 will feel smoother for scrolling and gaming.
Pixel Density (PPI)390269A34 provides noticeably sharper text and images.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)A34's chipset is more powerful and energy-efficient.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55)A34 offers better multi-core performance for demanding tasks.
GPUMali-G68 MC4Mali-G52 MC2A34 provides significantly better graphics performance for gaming.
RAM6/8 GB8 GBBoth offer sufficient RAM for multitasking, though A34 offers a 6GB variant.
OSAndroid 13Android 14G24 Power has a newer Android version out of the box.
Camera
Rear Camera48MP Main, 8MP Ultrawide, 5MP Macro, 5MP Depth50MP Main, 8MP Ultrawide, 2MP MacroSensor details missing for G24 Power, making detailed comparison difficult. A34 offers a dedicated depth sensor for better portrait mode.
Front Camera13MP8MPA34 has a higher resolution selfie camera.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@30fpsUp to 1080p@30fpsA34 can record higher resolution videos.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50006000G24 Power offers significantly longer battery life.
Fast Charging25W30WG24 Power has slightly faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A34 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED technology, higher resolution, and faster refresh rate provide a vastly improved visual experience.
  • Better Performance: More powerful chipset and GPU enable smoother multitasking and gaming.
  • Higher Quality Camera System: Dedicated depth sensor and potentially better overall image quality based on the main sensor in the A34.

Motorola Moto G24 Power Advantages:

  • Longer Battery Life: Larger battery capacity translates to significantly extended usage time.
  • Lower Price: Positioned in the low price range, offering greater affordability.
  • Newer Android Version: Ships with Android 14, potentially offering longer software support.

Trade-offs:

  • G24 Power: Sacrifices display quality, performance, and camera features for longer battery life and lower price.
  • A34: Higher price for a better overall user experience excluding battery life.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A34: Users who prioritize display quality, performance, and camera, and are willing to pay a premium. Ideal for:

  • Multimedia consumption: Watching videos, browsing photos.
  • Mobile gaming: Playing demanding games.
  • Photography enthusiasts: Capturing high-quality photos and videos.

Motorola Moto G24 Power: Users who prioritize battery life above all else and are on a tight budget. Ideal for:

  • Basic users: Primarily using for calls, messaging, and light browsing.
  • Users needing long battery life: Essential for travelers, field workers, or those without frequent access to charging.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The G24 Power is significantly more affordable.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Heavy multimedia users and gamers will prefer the A34. Those needing maximum battery life will prefer the G24 Power.
  3. How important is display quality and camera performance? The A34 significantly outperforms the G24 Power in these areas.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A34

While the Motorola Moto G24 Power boasts impressive battery life, the Samsung Galaxy A34 offers a significantly better overall user experience. The superior display, performance, and camera make it a more versatile device for a wider range of users. The price difference is justifiable for the substantial improvements in key areas that impact daily usage. For me, a smooth and visually engaging experience, along with robust performance, outweighs the need for exceptionally long battery life, especially when moderate usage of the A34 would still provide a full day's charge.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.