Samsung Galaxy A34 vs Motorola Edge 50 Fusion - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 May 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 103.3 cm³ 93.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.32 "/g 3.83 "/g
Weight 199 g 174.9 g
Height 161.3 mm 161.9 mm
Width 78.1 mm 73.1 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Forest Blue
  • Marshmallow Blue
  • Hot Pink

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 91.6 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.4 mAh/cm³ 53.48 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) - International
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - International
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Adreno 710

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A34Motorola Edge 50 FusionPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2161.9 x 73.1 x 7.9Edge 50 Fusion is slightly narrower and thinner. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)199174.9Edge 50 Fusion is noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use and reducing pocket bulk.
Build MaterialUnspecifiedUnspecifiedCannot compare durability and premium feel without this information.
Display
Display TypeSuper AMOLEDpOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. Preference is subjective.
Display Size (inches)6.66.7Edge 50 Fusion offers slightly more screen real estate.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120/144 (Region Dependent)Both offer smooth scrolling and animations. The 144Hz option on the Edge 50 Fusion in some regions provides a slight edge in fluidity for gaming.
Peak Brightness (nits)1000 (HBM)1600Edge 50 Fusion is significantly brighter, ensuring better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm)Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 is generally more powerful and efficient. Expect smoother performance and better battery life on the Edge 50 Fusion.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55)While clock speeds differ slightly, the architecture difference makes the Snapdragon likely faster.
GPUMali-G68 MC4Adreno 710Adreno 710 generally offers better gaming performance.
RAM6/8 GB8/12 GBEdge 50 Fusion offers more RAM in its higher-end configurations, improving multitasking and app loading times.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)4850Edge 50 Fusion has a slightly higher resolution main sensor, potentially capturing more detail. Real-world performance depends on image processing.
Selfie Camera (MP)1332Edge 50 Fusion has a much higher resolution selfie camera, resulting in significantly better selfies.
Video Recording4K@30fps4K@30fps with EISBoth record 4K video. Edge 50 Fusion benefits from Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) for smoother footage.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Both have the same battery capacity.
Fast Charging (W)2568Edge 50 Fusion offers significantly faster charging, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Advantages:

  • More powerful and efficient processor: Leading to better overall performance, smoother gaming, and potentially longer battery life.
  • Brighter display: Easier to use outdoors.
  • Faster charging: Significantly reduces charging time.
  • Higher resolution selfie camera: Noticeably better selfie quality.
  • More RAM in higher configurations: Improved multitasking.
  • Video Stabilization: Smoother video recording.

Samsung Galaxy A34 Advantages:

  • Potentially lower price: Depending on configuration and region.
  • Slightly smaller and lighter: Depending on individual preferences, some may find it more pocketable.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a bright display, fast charging, a good selfie camera, and smooth video recording. Suitable for gaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking.

Samsung Galaxy A34: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize a reliable overall experience without needing top-tier performance or the fastest charging.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The A34 is likely more affordable.
  2. What are your performance needs? Gamers and power users will prefer the Edge 50 Fusion.
  3. How important is camera quality, especially selfies? The Edge 50 Fusion has a clear advantage.

My Choice: Motorola Edge 50 Fusion

While lacking some specific details like build materials, the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion presents a compelling package. The significantly faster processor, brighter display, vastly improved fast charging, and better selfie camera outweigh the potential price difference for me. The performance gains, improved user experience in various scenarios (gaming, outdoor use, content creation), and faster charging make it the more future-proof choice. While the A34 is a solid option for budget-conscious buyers, the Edge 50 Fusion offers tangible benefits that justify the potential price premium. The improved video stabilization is also a key factor for capturing everyday moments.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.