Samsung Galaxy A34 vs HTC U23 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 May 18, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 103.3 cm³ 114.32 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.32 "/g 3.27 "/g
Weight 199 g 205 g
Height 161.3 mm 166.6 mm
Width 78.1 mm 77.1 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Snow White
  • Coffee Black

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 84.4 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 102.47 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.4 mAh/cm³ 40.24 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4600 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A34HTC U23 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2166.6 x 77.1 x 8.9The HTC U23 Pro is slightly larger and thicker.
Weight (g)199205Negligible weight difference in practical use.
Fingerprint SensorUnder displaySide-mountedPersonal preference; both are reliable unlocking methods.
Display
Display TypeSuper AMOLED, 120HzOLED, 120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and vibrant colors; Super AMOLED generally offers deeper blacks and higher brightness.
Size (inches)6.66.7The HTC U23 Pro has a marginally larger screen.
Resolution (px)1080 x 23401080 x 2400Virtually identical pixel density, resulting in similar sharpness.
PPI390393Negligible difference in sharpness.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 generally offers better performance and efficiency due to the smaller manufacturing process node.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 likely provides better multi-core performance due to its more modern core architecture.
GPUMali-G68 MC4Adreno 644Adreno 644 is expected to deliver smoother gaming and graphics performance.
RAM (GB)6/88/12More RAM in higher-end U23 Pro variants enables better multitasking and app switching.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)48108The HTC boasts higher resolution, potentially capturing more detail. However, megapixels alone don't guarantee image quality.
Ultrawide (MP)58Slightly wider field of view on the HTC.
Other CamerasDepth 5MPDepth 5MP, Macro 2MPThe macro lens on the HTC can be useful for close-up shots, but its low resolution limits its usefulness.
Video4K@30fps4K@30fpsComparable video resolution. HTC mentions EIS (Electronic Image Stabilization), suggesting potentially better video stability.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50004600Larger battery capacity on the Samsung likely translates to longer battery life.
Fast Charging25W30WFaster charging on the HTC; however, the real-world difference might be less significant than the numbers suggest.
Wireless ChargingNo15W + 5W ReverseHTC offers wireless and reverse wireless charging, providing added convenience.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A34 Advantages:

  • Longer Battery Life: The larger 5000mAh battery is a significant advantage for users who prioritize all-day usage.
  • Potentially Lower Price: The A34 is generally more affordable.

HTC U23 Pro Advantages:

  • Better Performance: The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 chipset and Adreno 644 GPU offer a noticeable performance advantage for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • More RAM in Higher-End Variants: 12GB RAM option provides excellent multitasking capabilities.
  • Wireless and Reverse Wireless Charging: Adds convenience for charging the phone and other devices.
  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: Potentially capturing more detail in photos, though real-world image quality depends on various factors.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A34: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and reliable performance for everyday tasks like social media, browsing, and light gaming.

HTC U23 Pro: Ideal for users who demand higher performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications. The wireless charging and potentially superior camera are bonuses.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The A34 offers excellent value for its price.
  2. What is your primary use case? Heavy gaming and multitasking favor the U23 Pro. Basic usage favors the A34 due to its longer battery life.
  3. How important are features like wireless charging? This is a key differentiator if wireless charging is a priority.

My Choice: HTC U23 Pro

While the Samsung Galaxy A34 offers compelling value and exceptional battery life, I would choose the HTC U23 Pro. The superior performance of the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, coupled with the Adreno 644 GPU, is crucial for my usage, which involves gaming and demanding applications. The added convenience of wireless charging and the potential for higher quality photos with the 108MP main camera further solidify my choice. While the slightly smaller battery is a trade-off, I find the performance and feature advantages of the U23 Pro to outweigh this minor drawback. I am also willing to pay a premium for the better overall experience. The 12GB RAM option is a significant factor for future-proofing and ensuring smooth performance for years to come.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.