Samsung Galaxy A34 vs Honor 200 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 May 31, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 103.3 cm³ 100.7 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.32 "/g 3.41 "/g
Weight 199 g 199 g
Height 161.3 mm 163.3 mm
Width 78.1 mm 75.2 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Black
  • Pink
  • Moonlight White
  • Ocean Cyan

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1224 x 2700
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 437 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 4000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 113.12 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.4 mAh/cm³ 51.64 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A34Honor 200 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2163.3 x 75.2 x 8.2Virtually identical in size and thickness.
Weight (g)199199Same weight, no noticeable difference in hand.
Build MaterialNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and feel.
Display
Display TypeSuper AMOLEDOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks; subjective preference may apply.
Display Size (inches)6.66.78Honor offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution (px)1080 x 23401224 x 2700Honor has a sharper display due to higher resolution, noticeable in detail and text clarity.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)1000 (HBM)4000Honor's significantly higher peak brightness ensures better visibility outdoors.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)Honor's newer and more powerful chipset will deliver significantly better performance in demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)Honor's CPU architecture is superior, leading to faster processing speeds and improved multitasking.
GPUMali-G68 MC4Adreno 735Honor's GPU offers a significant performance advantage for gaming and graphically intensive applications.
RAM (GB)6/812Honor's larger RAM enables smoother multitasking and better handling of demanding apps.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)4850While both have high megapixel counts, image quality depends on sensor size and processing; Honor's larger sensor (1/1.3") likely captures more light.
Ultrawide (MP)512Honor offers a higher resolution ultrawide camera for better landscape shots.
TelephotoNo50MP with 2.5x optical zoomHonor's dedicated telephoto lens provides optical zoom for clearer zoomed images, a significant advantage.
Video Capabilities4K@30fps4K@30fps with OIS, EISHonor features OIS and EIS for significantly more stable video recording.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005200Honor has a slightly larger battery capacity, potentially offering longer battery life.
Fast Charging (W)25100Honor's significantly faster charging drastically reduces charging time.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Honor 200 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset and larger RAM deliver a noticeable performance advantage for demanding tasks, gaming, and multitasking.
  • Superior camera system: The inclusion of a telephoto lens with optical zoom, higher resolution ultrawide, larger main sensor, and OIS/EIS for video recording makes the Honor 200 Pro a more versatile camera phone.
  • Sharper and brighter display: Higher resolution and peak brightness enhance clarity and outdoor visibility.
  • Much faster charging: 100W fast charging drastically reduces charging times compared to the Galaxy A34's 25W.

Samsung Galaxy A34 Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: Based on the provided pricing data, the A34 is significantly cheaper. This could be a deciding factor for budget-conscious buyers.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A34: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize essential smartphone features like calling, messaging, social media, and light web browsing. Not recommended for demanding tasks or mobile gaming.

Honor 200 Pro: Ideal for users who demand top-tier performance, a versatile camera system, and a premium display. Suited for mobile gamers, content creators, and power users.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Honor 200 Pro is considerably more expensive.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? For basic tasks, the A34 is sufficient. For demanding tasks and gaming, the Honor 200 Pro is a better choice.
  3. How important is camera quality and versatility to you? The Honor 200 Pro's superior camera system is a major differentiating factor.

My Choice: Honor 200 Pro

Despite the lack of specific pricing for the Honor 200 Pro's 12GB/512GB version, the significant advancements in performance, camera technology, and display quality make it a compelling choice. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, coupled with 12GB RAM, ensures a smooth and future-proof experience. The inclusion of a telephoto lens and improved image stabilization for video recording caters to my photography and videography needs. While the Samsung Galaxy A34 offers a decent package for its price, the Honor 200 Pro justifies its higher price with tangible improvements across the board. The faster charging speed is also a huge benefit in today's fast-paced world. However, if budget is a primary concern, the A34 is a respectable alternative for less demanding users.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.