Samsung Galaxy A34 vs Google Pixel 8 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 October 12, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 103.3 cm³ 109.46 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.32 "/g 3.15 "/g
Weight 199 g 213 g
Height 161.3 mm 162.6 mm
Width 78.1 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Mint
  • Obsidian
  • Porcelain
  • Bay

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1344 x 2992
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 87 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 489 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits 1600 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 2400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 112.50 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.4 mAh/cm³ 46.13 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5050 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) Google Tensor G3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Immortalis-G715s MC10

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17 21

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A34Google Pixel 8 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2162.6 x 76.5 x 8.8Pixel 8 Pro is slightly larger and thicker.
Weight (g)199213Pixel 8 Pro is noticeably heavier.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality and materials cannot be compared.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.7Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution (px)1080 x 23401344 x 2992Pixel 8 Pro has a significantly sharper display with higher pixel density, resulting in crisper text and images.
Panel TypeSuper AMOLEDLTPO OLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. Pixel's LTPO allows for dynamic refresh rate adjustment, potentially saving battery.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)1000 (HBM)2400 (peak)Pixel 8 Pro offers much higher peak brightness, ensuring better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)Google Tensor G3 (4 nm)Tensor G3 is expected to offer significantly better performance and efficiency due to its more advanced manufacturing process and architecture.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510)Pixel 8 Pro boasts a more powerful CPU configuration, leading to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better handling of demanding tasks.
GPUMali-G68 MC4Immortalis-G715s MC10Pixel 8 Pro has a more powerful GPU, resulting in smoother gaming and faster graphics rendering.
RAM (GB)6/812Pixel 8 Pro offers significantly more RAM, enabling better multitasking and preventing apps from closing in the background.
Camera
Rear Cameras48MP Main, 8MP Ultrawide, 5MP Macro, 5MP Depth50MP Main, 48MP Ultrawide, 48MP TelephotoPixel 8 Pro features a superior camera system with a higher resolution main sensor, a dedicated telephoto lens, and advanced computational photography capabilities powered by the Tensor G3.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@30fpsUp to 4K@60fps with HDR, OIS, EISPixel 8 Pro offers higher resolution and frame rate video recording with advanced stabilization and HDR.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005050Negligible difference in battery capacity.
Charging25W Wired30W Wired, 23W WirelessPixel 8 Pro supports faster wired charging and wireless charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A34 Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: A34 likely falls in a more affordable price bracket.

Google Pixel 8 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Tensor G3 chip provides a significant performance advantage for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Significantly Better Camera: Higher resolution sensors, a dedicated telephoto lens, and advanced computational photography provide a major edge in image quality and versatility.
  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution and peak brightness provide a more enjoyable viewing experience.
  • Faster Charging: Offers faster wired and wireless charging options.
  • Longer Software Support: Pixel phones receive guaranteed OS and security updates for longer.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A34: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic smartphone functionality and a decent display. Suitable for everyday tasks like web browsing, social media, and casual photography.

Google Pixel 8 Pro: Users who demand top-tier performance, the best camera experience, and a premium display. Ideal for power users, mobile gamers, photography enthusiasts, and those who value software updates.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The A34 is likely significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? For basic use, the A34 might suffice. For demanding tasks, gaming, or photography, the Pixel 8 Pro is superior.
  3. How important is software support and longevity? Pixel phones generally receive longer software updates.

My Choice: Google Pixel 8 Pro

While the Samsung Galaxy A34 is likely a competent device for its price range, the Google Pixel 8 Pro is the clear winner for me. The significantly improved performance, vastly superior camera system, brighter and sharper display, and longer software support outweigh the price difference. The Tensor G3 chip unlocks unique AI features and computational photography capabilities that enhance the overall user experience in ways the A34 cannot match. As someone who values performance, camera quality, and a future-proof device, the Pixel 8 Pro is the better investment.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.