Samsung Galaxy A34 vs Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2023 January 18, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 103.3 cm³ 111.96 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.32 "/g 3.01 "/g
Weight 199 g 225 g
Height 161.3 mm 163.8 mm
Width 78.1 mm 76.8 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime
  • Phantom Black

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 88.2 %
Pixel Density 390 PPI 388 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits 1600 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 2500 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 119.65 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.4 mAh/cm³ 49.12 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G68 MC4 Adreno 750

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A 1.4
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4, Bottom Port

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A34Asus ROG Phone 8 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2163.8 x 76.8 x 8.9ROG Phone 8 Pro is slightly larger and thicker.
Weight (g)199225ROG Phone 8 Pro is noticeably heavier.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.78ROG Phone 8 Pro offers a slightly larger screen.
Resolution (px)1080 x 23401080 x 2448Very similar resolutions, minimal practical difference in sharpness.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120165ROG Phone 8 Pro's higher refresh rate results in smoother animations and scrolling, especially noticeable in gaming.
Display TypeSuper AMOLEDLTPO AMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. LTPO allows for dynamic refresh rate adjustment, potentially saving battery on the ROG Phone. ROG Phone also boasts significantly higher peak brightness, improving outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers significantly higher performance and efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)ROG Phone 8 Pro has a more powerful and modern CPU architecture, leading to much faster processing speeds.
GPUMali-G68 MC4Adreno 750Adreno 750 provides a substantial leap in graphics performance, crucial for demanding games and applications.
RAM (GB)6/816/24ROG Phone 8 Pro offers significantly more RAM, enabling smoother multitasking and handling of demanding applications.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)4850Both offer high resolution, but image quality depends on sensor and processing.
Additional CamerasWide, Depth, SelfieWide, Macro, Telephoto, SelfieROG Phone offers more versatile camera options with a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom and a macro lens for close-up shots.
Video Recording4K@30fps8K@24fpsROG Phone 8 Pro supports higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50006000ROG Phone 8 Pro has a larger battery, potentially providing longer battery life.
Fast Charging (W)2565ROG Phone 8 Pro supports significantly faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A34 Advantages:

  • More Affordable: Likely significantly cheaper than the ROG Phone 8 Pro.
  • Lighter and More Compact: Easier to handle and carry for extended periods.

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly Higher Performance: Much faster CPU and GPU for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Smoother Display: Higher refresh rate and LTPO technology.
  • More Versatile Camera System: Telephoto lens for optical zoom and macro lens.
  • Larger Battery and Faster Charging: Longer battery life and quicker charging times.
  • More RAM: Better multitasking and handling of demanding applications.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A34:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who prioritize affordability and a lightweight design for everyday tasks like social media, browsing, and casual photography.
  • Use Cases: Casual gaming, social media, web browsing, basic photography.

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro:

  • Ideal User: Power users and mobile gamers who demand top-tier performance, a smooth display, and advanced camera features.
  • Use Cases: Demanding mobile gaming, professional content creation, photography enthusiasts.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The A34 offers good value for its price, while the ROG Phone 8 Pro commands a premium.
  2. What are your primary use cases? For everyday tasks, the A34 is sufficient. For demanding gaming and content creation, the ROG Phone 8 Pro excels.
  3. Do you prioritize performance or affordability? The ROG Phone 8 Pro offers top-tier performance, while the A34 prioritizes affordability.

My Choice: Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro

While the Samsung Galaxy A34 is a solid mid-range device, the Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro is the clear winner for me. Its superior performance, smoother display with higher peak brightness, more versatile camera system, larger battery with faster charging, and expansive RAM make it a compelling package. While the price is significantly higher, the substantial upgrades across the board justify the premium for my needs. I prioritize a smooth and powerful user experience, and the ROG Phone 8 Pro delivers that in spades. While heavier, the increased performance and battery life are worth the trade-off.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.