Samsung Galaxy A33 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 20, 2022 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 95.72 cm³ 103.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.16 "/g
Weight 186 g 209 g
Height 159.7 mm 161.7 mm
Width 74 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Peach
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.7 % 84.8 %
Pixel Density 411 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.23 mAh/cm³ 48.34 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1280 (5 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 16 18

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A33 5G vs. Samsung Galaxy A35: A User-Centered Perspective

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones beyond the raw numbers. Let's delve into a narrative-driven comparison, focusing on how design choices translate into real-world experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A33 5GSamsung Galaxy A35User Experience ImpactCategory
Display6.4" 90Hz AMOLED6.6" 120Hz AMOLEDA35 offers a slightly larger, smoother display, enhancing media consumption and gaming. The difference in size is minimal, but the increased refresh rate contributes to a more fluid user experience.Interface Design
Weight & Dimensions186g, slimmer209g, slightly largerA33 5G provides a more comfortable one-handed experience due to its lighter weight and slimmer profile. Extended use will be less fatiguing.Design Ergonomics
OS & PerformanceAndroid 12, Exynos 1280Android 14, Exynos 1380A35 boasts newer software with longer support and a significantly faster processor, resulting in quicker app launches and smoother multitasking.Interaction Flow
CameraQuad Camera, OISTriple Camera, OIS, enhanced softwareWhile A33 5G has an extra depth sensor, A35's superior software processing, higher resolution main sensor and improved video stabilization deliver noticeably better image and video quality overall.Interface Design
Battery5000mAh, 25W5000mAh, 25WSimilar battery life, but A35's newer processor might offer slightly better efficiency.Interaction Flow

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Imagine two users: a college student (Sarah) with the A33 5G and a young professional (David) with the A35. Sarah enjoys casual gaming and social media. David needs a phone for productivity, photography, and occasional gaming.

  • Scenario: Both are at a concert, recording videos. David's A35, with its superior video stabilization and higher resolution, captures clearer, smoother footage, even in the low-light environment.
  • Scenario: Sarah is browsing social media on the bus. The A33 5G's lighter weight makes it more comfortable to hold for extended periods.
  • Scenario: David is editing photos on his phone. The A35's faster processor allows for seamless editing without lag, thanks to the newer chipset and enhanced AI capabilities.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

Both phones cater to a broad audience. However:

  • Users with smaller hands: The A33 5G is a clear winner due to its lighter weight and smaller form factor.
  • Power Users: The A35's performance advantage benefits those who demand speed and efficiency for multitasking and demanding applications.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: The A35's advanced camera features cater to users who prioritize image and video quality.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The A33 5G prioritizes comfort and ease of use, while the A35 emphasizes performance and advanced features. The best choice depends on individual priorities.

My Choice:

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A35. While the A33 5G offers a more comfortable physical experience, the A35's superior performance, newer software with longer update support, significantly improved camera capabilities and enhanced features, like better screen protection, create a more future-proof and compelling overall package. The slightly heavier weight is a trade-off I'm willing to make for the noticeable gains in speed, longevity, and content creation capabilities. The A35 better aligns with my need for a device that can keep pace with my dynamic lifestyle and evolving technological demands, while still providing a enjoyable user experience.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.