Samsung Galaxy A33 5G vs Motorola Moto G85 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 20, 2022 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 95.72 cm³ 89.95 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.9 "/g
Weight 186 g 171 g
Height 159.7 mm 161.9 mm
Width 74 mm 73.1 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Peach
  • Cobalt Blue
  • Olive Green
  • Urban Grey
  • Magenta

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.7 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 411 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.23 mAh/cm³ 55.59 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1280 (5 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G and the Motorola Moto G85. Instead of getting bogged down in technical jargon, we'll explore how these devices translate into real-world experiences for you.

Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A33 5GMotorola Moto G85User Experience Impact
Interface DesignOne UIMy UXBoth offer clean interfaces, but My UX is known for its near-stock Android feel, potentially appealing to purists.
Interaction Flow90Hz Refresh Rate120Hz Refresh RateMoto G85 boasts smoother scrolling and animations, leading to a more fluid and visually appealing experience.
AccessibilityStandard Android AccessibilityStandard Android AccessibilityBoth provide basic accessibility features, but deeper investigation into specific needs is recommended.
Design ErgonomicsSlightly thicker and heavierLighter and slightly tallerMoto G85 might be more comfortable for extended use due to its lighter weight.

Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Imagine you're at a vibrant outdoor concert. With the Moto G85's 1600 nits brightness, your screen remains clearly visible even under direct sunlight, allowing you to capture stunning photos and videos. The A33 5G, with its lower brightness, might struggle in such bright conditions. However, if you're a mobile photography enthusiast, the A33 5G's dedicated macro lens lets you capture intricate details of flowers or textures, a feature the Moto G85 lacks.

Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

For a user who prioritizes a smooth and responsive experience, the Moto G85's 120Hz refresh rate and faster processor will be a significant draw. However, a user who values battery longevity might appreciate the A33 5G's bypass charging feature, which reduces heat and prolongs battery lifespan during extended gaming sessions.

Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Prioritize Visual Fluidity: Choose the Moto G85 for its higher refresh rate and brighter display.

Value Battery Health and Detailed Photography: Opt for the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G for its bypass charging and dedicated macro lens.

Seek a Clean, Stock Android Experience: Consider the Moto G85 for its My UX interface.

My Choice: The Motorola Moto G85

While both phones offer compelling features, I would choose the Motorola Moto G85. Its superior display brightness, smoother 120Hz refresh rate, and more recent Android OS (14 vs. 12 on the A33 5G, potentially upgradable to 16), combined with a lighter and more comfortable design, create a more compelling overall user experience for me. The slightly faster charging is a bonus for my on-the-go lifestyle. While I appreciate the A33 5G's macro lens and bypass charging, the Moto G85's advantages in core areas like display and performance outweigh those benefits in my personal use case. I believe the Moto G85 offers a more future-proof and enjoyable mobile experience.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.