Smartphone Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 vs. ZTE Blade A75 4G
1. Specifications Comparison
Design
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Dimensions | 158.9 × 73.6 × 8.4 mm | 164.1 × 75.8 × 8.6 mm | The ZTE is slightly larger in all dimensions. The ZTE may feel slightly less comfortable in smaller hands or pockets. |
| Weight | 184g | 189g | The Samsung is 5g lighter, which may be noticeable during prolonged use. |
| Build | Standard | Standard | Both are standard smartphones, implying similar handling and durability. |
Display
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Size | 6.4" | 6.6" | The ZTE offers a slightly larger viewing area which is better for media consumption and gaming. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1612 | The Samsung's higher resolution display will look significantly sharper and clearer, especially for text and detailed images. |
| Pixel Density | 411 PPI | 267 PPI | The Samsung's higher pixel density will result in a much crisper and more detailed display, leading to a better overall viewing experience. |
| Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | The Samsung's AMOLED display will have superior contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors, making images and videos look more engaging and it is more power-efficient when using dark modes. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 90Hz | Both offer smooth scrolling and animations, making interactions feel more fluid. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Brightness is a crucial factor for outdoor visibility, however, neither brightness is specified. |
Performance
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Different chipsets. The practical implications would be reflected by the Antutu score. |
| AnTuTu Score | 200,458 | 240,000 | The ZTE has a 20% higher benchmark score, indicating it might perform marginally better for demanding tasks and gaming. |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 | The ZTE's GPU is newer and might offer slightly better graphical performance in games. |
Camera
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Main Camera | 64.2MP, f/1.8 | 50MP, f/1.8 | The Samsung's higher megapixel count might result in more detailed photos in good lighting conditions, but real-world performance may vary. |
| Front Camera | 20MP, f/2.2 | 8MP | The Samsung's front camera should capture much more detailed selfies. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 8MP, f/2.2 | None | The Samsung offers more versatility with its inclusion of a wide-angle lens for group shots and landscapes. |
| Portrait Lens | 5MP, f/2.4 | None | The Samsung offers dedicated depth sensing for better portrait photos. |
| Macro Lens | 5MP, f/2.4 | None | The Samsung can capture close-up detailed shots that would be impossible on the ZTE. |
| Video Recording | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps | Both record at standard 1080p which is good for social media sharing, but have different features. |
| Camera Features | Quadruple camera, Digital zoom, Autofocus, Touch focus, Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer | Dual camera, Digital zoom, Digital image stabilization, Autofocus, Touch focus, Phase detection autofocus (PDAF), Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer | The Samsung has more lenses and features which lead to more versatile photography options. The ZTE has digital image stabilization, and Phase detection autofocus (PDAF). |
Battery
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Both should offer similar battery life on a single charge for typical usage. |
| Charging | Li-Ion | 22.5W fast charging, Li-Polymer | The ZTE offers faster charging which will reduce the time to charge from low battery, additionally Li-Polymer batteries are typically more durable than Li-Ion batteries. |
| Battery Features | Non-removable | Non-removable | Both phones have batteries that cannot be replaced by the user. |
Software
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Operating System | Android 11 (upgradable to 13) | Android 13 | The ZTE has a newer version of android out of the box, which typically implies more modern features and improved security. |
Connectivity
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|
| WiFi | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | Both offer standard WiFi capabilities and similar connection quality. |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 (with full features) | 5.0 LE | The Samsung has more Bluetooth features like AVRCP, DIP, HFP, HID, HSP, MAP, PAN, OPP, PBAP/PAB, and HOGP. The ZTE focuses on low energy consumption with LE. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | Both offer standard location and navigation features. |
| SIM | Dual SIM Dual Standby (Nano SIM + Nano SIM) | Dual SIM Dual Standby (Nano SIM + Nano SIM) | Both support dual SIM use. |
Storage
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Internal | 64GB/128 GB | 128GB/256GB | The ZTE offers more storage which is better for storing photos, videos, and other files, also the base storage option is 128GB compared to the Samsung's 64GB. |
| RAM | 4GB/6GB/8GB | 4GB/8GB | Both have similar RAM options allowing for similar multitasking abilities with 4GB and 8GB options, but the Samsung also offers a 6GB option. |
| Expandable | No | No | Neither phone allows for storage expansion via SD cards. |
Other Features
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|
| Audio | Basic audio features | DTS / DTS X | The ZTE has an edge in audio quality for a more immersive experience. |
| Security | Basic fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | The ZTE's side-mounted fingerprint sensor is more convenient and responsive. |
| Sensors | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Hall, Geomagnetic | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope | The Samsung has additional sensors including a Compass, Hall, and Geomagnetic sensor, which is useful for advanced features and games. |
| Build Quality | Screen Protection: Unknown | Screen Protection: Unknown | Both phones use similar screen protection, but the exact technology is unknown. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A32 Advantages:
- Superior Display: AMOLED screen with higher resolution and pixel density provides a much better viewing experience (sharper, more vibrant).
- More Versatile Camera System: Additional wide-angle, macro, and depth lenses offer more flexibility for various types of photography.
- More Bluetooth Features: More Bluetooth features support more functionality in compatible devices.
- More Sensors: The additional compass, hall, and geomagnetic sensors provide more advanced features and improved gaming experiences.
- More RAM options: Offers a 6GB option alongside the 4GB and 8GB options.
ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:
- Newer Operating System: Comes with Android 13, offering newer features and security updates out of the box.
- Faster Charging: 22.5W fast charging significantly reduces charging times.
- Better Performance: The ZTE scores higher on benchmark tests, offering marginally better performance.
- More Storage: Higher internal storage (256GB option) provides more space for files and apps.
- Enhanced Audio: DTS / DTS X support offers enhanced audio quality for media consumption.
- Modern fingerprint sensor: Side-mounted fingerprint sensor offers more convenience.
Trade-offs
- The Samsung offers a much better display but it is an older device with a worse processor.
- The ZTE has a newer processor but has a lower quality display with a lower resolution and pixel density.
- The ZTE has much faster charging capabilities, while the Samsung does not offer fast charging.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A32:
- Ideal User: Someone who prioritizes display quality for media consumption, gaming, and general use, and values a more versatile camera system.
- Use Cases:
- Watching videos and movies with vibrant colors and deep blacks.
- Playing graphic-intensive games with high visual clarity.
- Capturing a variety of photos and videos with wide angle, macro, and portrait lenses.
- Regular social media users and anyone who enjoys consuming content.
- Users who have many compatible devices and appreciate the extra Bluetooth features.
- Users who value having as many sensors as possible.
- Price-to-Value: Might be a good option if found at a good price, considering its display and camera features, even though it has older software.
ZTE Blade A75 4G:
- Ideal User: Someone who needs a reliable phone for daily tasks with long-lasting battery, fast charging, and values having a modern OS.
- Use Cases:
- Everyday use and productivity with a smoother overall user experience.
- Playing casual games and running everyday apps with decent performance.
- People who appreciate quicker charging times and don't want to wait as long to use their phone.
- Users who value having the newest available software on their phones.
- Price-to-Value: Offers better value for those looking for a more affordable phone with solid performance, fast charging and updated software.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions to Consider:
- How much do you value display quality? If visual fidelity is a top priority, the Samsung's AMOLED display is the clear winner.
- Do you prioritize the newest software and fast charging? The ZTE excels in both aspects and may be a better fit for those who value new features.
- How important are the cameras? If you value having multiple lenses and features, the Samsung's quadruple camera system is superior.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Media Enthusiast: If you watch a lot of videos and movies, the Samsung's superior AMOLED display with higher resolution will provide a far better experience.
- Scenario 2: Budget-Conscious User: If you need a reliable phone for basic tasks, quick charging, and don't want to spend as much, the ZTE is a cost-effective choice with decent performance.
- Scenario 3: Photography Enthusiast: The Samsung is the better choice because it has a wide angle lens, a macro lens, a portrait mode lens and also a higher resolution main camera and front facing camera.
- Scenario 4: User who wants the best performance: The ZTE offers better performance in terms of benchmarks and newer software than the Samsung.
My Choice
If I had to choose between these two phones, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A32. While the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers faster charging, slightly better performance, and a more modern OS, the superior display on the A32 is a game changer for me. The AMOLED screen with higher resolution and pixel density makes it a much more enjoyable experience for my primary use cases, such as media consumption, reading and looking at photos. I also prioritize a versatile camera system, and the A32's additional lenses provide more flexibility for photography. While it is an older device, if found at a competitive price, the Samsung Galaxy A32’s display and camera advantages outweigh the benefits of the slightly better performance of the ZTE.
