Smartphone Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 vs. Xiaomi Poco X3 GT
1. Specifications Comparison
Here's a detailed comparison of the two smartphones, focusing on their practical implications for users:
Design
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 | Xiaomi Poco X3 GT | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 158.9 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm | 163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm | Poco X3 GT is larger and slightly bulkier, potentially less comfortable for single-handed use; A32 might be more pocketable. |
| Weight | 184g | 193g | A32 is slightly lighter, making it more comfortable for prolonged use, but the difference is not dramatic. |
| Build | Unspecified | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Poco X3 GT has superior screen protection, suggesting better resistance to scratches and impacts; A32 screen protection is unknown. |
Display
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 | Xiaomi Poco X3 GT | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size | 6.4" | 6.6" | Poco X3 GT offers a slightly larger viewing area, which is better for media consumption and gaming. A32 provides a more compact experience. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | Both phones have the same resolution resulting in very similar levels of sharpness. |
| PPI | 411 | 399 | Both have high pixel densities leading to sharp visuals. The slight difference is likely imperceptible in daily use. |
| Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | A32's AMOLED screen delivers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better contrast and greater efficiency for dark themes than the IPS LCD on the Poco X3 GT. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 120Hz | Poco X3 GT will have smoother scrolling and animations, which may be noticeable when gaming or using social media. A32 is also smooth, but less so. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Peak brightness is not specified for either phone. In normal usage it's difficult to assess, but a higher brightness will be more readable under sunlight |
Performance
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 | Xiaomi Poco X3 GT | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) | Poco X3 GT has a significantly more powerful processor, providing much better performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding apps, and greater overall speed. |
| AnTuTu Score | 200,458 | 745,283 | Poco X3 GT scores over 3.5 times higher, indicating significantly faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming. The A32 may struggle with resource-intensive tasks. |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G77 MC9 | Poco X3 GT's superior GPU allows for better graphics in games and smoother rendering of visually intensive applications. |
Camera
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 | Xiaomi Poco X3 GT | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Camera | 64.2MP, f/1.8, Unspecified sensor & pixel size | 64MP, f/1.79, 1/2" Omnivision OV64B, 0.70 µm pixel size | Poco X3 GT has a slightly wider aperture for better low-light performance and larger pixel size, capturing better light, while A32 resolution is negligible. Sensor information is missing on the A32. |
| Selfie Camera | 20MP, f/2.2, Unspecified sensor & pixel size | 16MP, f/2.45, Unspecified sensor & pixel size | A32 has a higher resolution and wider aperture selfie camera, potentially offering better details in photos and videos. Pixel information is missing for both. |
| Wide Angle lens | 8MP, f/2.2, Unspecified sensor & pixel size | Not included | A32 offers a wide-angle lens for capturing more of the scene, lacking in Poco X3 GT. Sensor and pixel information are missing for the A32 wide angle. |
| Depth Sensor | 5MP, f/2.4, Unspecified sensor & pixel size | Not included | A32 includes a dedicated depth sensor for improved portrait mode effects that is missing in Poco X3 GT. Sensor and pixel information are missing for the A32 depth sensor. |
| Macro lens | 5MP, f/2.4, Unspecified sensor & pixel size | Not included | A32 includes a dedicated macro lens for close up shots lacking in Poco X3 GT. Sensor and pixel information are missing for the A32 macro lens. |
| Video | 1080p@30fps; No stabilisation; No Slow-motion | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; No stabilisation; Slow-motion 960fps | Poco X3 GT offers much more versatile video recording with 4K support, higher frame rate options and slow-motion capabilities. |
| Features | Quadruple camera, Digital zoom, Autofocus, Touch focus, Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer | 4K Video, Triple camera, Digital zoom, Digital image stabilization, Ultra stable video, Autofocus, Touch focus, Manual focus, Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer, RAW, Night Mode | Poco X3 GT has additional video enhancements and advanced photography features like night mode and RAW capture. A32 features additional camera in the form of a depth sensor. |
Battery
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 | Xiaomi Poco X3 GT | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Both phones offer similar battery capacity which should provide comparable battery life for daily usage. |
| Charging | Li-Ion | 67W fast charging, Li-Polymer | Poco X3 GT supports much faster charging, significantly reducing the time needed to recharge the battery. Li-Polymer is slightly more stable. |
| Features | Non-removable | Non-removable | Both phones do not have replaceable batteries |
Other
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 | Xiaomi Poco X3 GT | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Software | Android 11, Max. Version 13 | Android 11 | Samsung guarantees an upgrade to Android 13, Poco X3 GT upgrade is not specified. |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 | Poco X3 GT supports the newer Wi-Fi 6 standard, offering better performance in crowded networks and faster data transfer speeds. |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 LE | Poco X3 GT features a newer Bluetooth version, with energy efficient features and more codec support for better audio. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, BeiDou (B1) | Poco X3 GT supports more satellite systems, resulting in better location accuracy. |
| Storage | 64/128 GB, No Expandable | 128/256 GB, No Expandable | Poco X3 GT offers higher storage options; Neither phone allows for storage expansion. |
| RAM | 4/6/8 GB | 8 GB | Poco X3 GT has 8GB of RAM across variants. A32 has variable ram options of up to 8 GB. |
| Audio | Basic Audio | Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphones | Poco X3 GT offers a far more immersive audio experience with higher audio quality, better separation and improved voice capture. |
| Security | basic fingerprint sensor | side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Poco X3 GT features a more modern side mounted fingerprint reader; A32 has a basic one. |
| Sensors | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Hall, Geomagnetic | Fingerprint, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Ultrasonic proximity virtual | Both have standard array of sensors suitable for gaming, with variations in proximity and other sensors. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Here’s a breakdown of the major advantages of each phone and the practical implications:
Samsung Galaxy A32 Advantages:
- AMOLED Display: Superior contrast, richer colors, and power efficiency, especially with dark mode usage.
- Versatile Camera System: Offers wide-angle, macro and depth sensors for more diverse shooting options.
- Higher Resolution Selfie Camera: The 20MP selfie camera has a higher resolution and a wider aperture.
Practical Implications: The A32 is better for users who prioritize display quality and versatile photography, especially those who enjoy taking wide-angle, macro, and portrait shots.
Xiaomi Poco X3 GT Advantages:
- Significantly Superior Performance: The Dimensity 1100 chipset offers substantially better performance for gaming, multitasking and resource intensive applications.
- Faster Display: 120Hz refresh rate screen for a smoother visual experience.
- Better Video Recording Capabilities: Supports 4K recording and slow-motion capture at 960fps.
- Faster Charging: 67W fast charging greatly reduces downtime.
- Better Audio: Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphones enhance the audio experience.
- Newer Wi-Fi & Bluetooth: Supports the latest Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.2 standards.
- Better Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus provides superior scratch and impact resistance.
Practical Implications: The Poco X3 GT excels in performance, video and audio quality, and offers a more future-proof experience for gaming, multitasking, and media consumption.
Trade-offs:
- The A32 sacrifices performance for a more versatile camera setup and AMOLED screen.
- The Poco X3 GT lacks the versatile camera setup (wide angle, macro, and depth) of the A32 and has an IPS LCD display instead of AMOLED.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A32:
- Ideal Users: Casual users who prioritize display quality and versatile photography capabilities. Users who do not play graphic intensive games and mainly use the phone for social media, browsing, and watching videos.
- Use Cases: Social media enthusiasts, casual photographers, users who prefer a more compact device, and people who heavily use dark mode.
- Price-to-Value: Offers good value for those seeking a great display and a versatile camera system at a lower price point.
Xiaomi Poco X3 GT:
- Ideal Users: Gamers, power users, and those who value performance and speed above all else. Users who enjoy consuming media and listening to music on their device.
- Use Cases: Mobile gaming, heavy multitasking, video editing, and media consumption with high audio quality.
- Price-to-Value: Offers incredible value for those looking for top-tier performance at a mid-range price point.
4. Decision Framework
Here are three key questions buyers should consider:
What is my priority: Display Quality or Performance?
- If display quality is crucial, the A32's AMOLED screen is the better option. If you need top performance, the Poco X3 GT is the better choice.
How important is gaming and resource intensive application usage?
- For mobile gaming and heavy multitasking, the Poco X3 GT is superior. Casual use is suitable for either.
How important is camera versatility and features?
- If you value versatile photography and need wide-angle, macro, and depth sensors, the A32 is better. If you value enhanced video recording and night photography, the Poco X3 GT is better
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
Casual User, Social Media:
- Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A32. It offers a great display and more versatile camera system for diverse photo needs.
Gamer/Power User:
- Recommendation: Xiaomi Poco X3 GT. Its superior performance, smoother display, better audio and fast charging are ideal for gaming.
Budget-Conscious User, Versatile Camera:
- Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A32. Provides an AMOLED screen with a versatile camera at a lower price point with a sacrifice in performance.
Media Consumer:
- Recommendation: Xiaomi Poco X3 GT. The high performance, better audio and larger display provides an enhanced experience.
Final Decision and Why
I would choose the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT.
Here's my reasoning:
While the AMOLED display of the Samsung Galaxy A32 is appealing, the sheer performance advantage of the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT is a more significant factor for my usage. The Poco X3 GT's Dimensity 1100 chip provides a far more responsive and fluid experience for daily tasks and any gaming I do. The faster 120Hz screen is also noticeable for daily use, and with that it has the advantages of stereo speakers and improved audio codecs that make it a far better option for media consumption, not to mention the fast charging.
The lack of the wide-angle camera is an inconvenience. but the improved video quality, and extra camera features like night mode make up for that in my opinion, plus the screen is protected with Gorilla Glass Victus
Ultimately, the overall performance, video, audio and future proofing of the Poco X3 GT outweighs the benefits of the AMOLED screen and extra lenses of the A32. For me, the Poco X3 GT provides the best balance of performance and features at a competitive price.
