1. Specifications Comparison
Design
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | Practical Impact |
Launch Date | 2021-02-25 | 2022-04-28 | The Poco F4 GT is newer, potentially having longer software support. |
Dimensions | 158.9 × 73.6 × 8.4 mm | 162.5 × 76.7 × 8.5 mm | The Poco F4 GT is slightly larger and bulkier, which might affect one-handed use. |
Weight | 184g | 210g | The Galaxy A32 is significantly lighter, making it more comfortable for prolonged use. |
Display
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | Practical Impact |
Size | 6.4" | 6.67" | The Poco F4 GT has a slightly larger display for a more immersive experience. |
Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | Both have identical sharpness; both offer crisp, clear images. |
PPI | 411 | 395 | Very similar pixel density; both displays are sharp for normal viewing distances. |
Technology | AMOLED | AMOLED | Both offer vibrant colors, deep blacks, and excellent contrast. |
Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 120Hz | The Poco F4 GT has smoother scrolling and animations, especially noticeable in gaming. |
Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Both phones lack brightness specifications. |
Performance
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | Practical Impact |
Chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 (12nm) | Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) | The Poco F4 GT offers significantly faster performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. |
Antutu Score | 200,458 | 1,178,365 | The Poco F4 GT offers a much smoother and more responsive experience, especially in demanding applications. |
GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 730 | The Poco F4 GT has a much more powerful GPU for graphically intensive games. |
Battery
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | Practical Impact |
Capacity | 5000mAh | 4700mAh | The Galaxy A32 has a slightly larger battery, possibly leading to slightly longer battery life. |
Charging | Li-Ion | 120W fast charging, Li-Ion | The Poco F4 GT charges much faster, going from 0% to full in a short period of time. |
Features | Non-removable | Non-removable | Standard non-removable battery design for both. |
Camera
Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | Practical Impact |
Main Camera Resolution | 64.2MP | 64MP | Similar resolution for detailed photos in good lighting. |
Main Camera Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.73 | The Poco F4 GT may perform slightly better in low-light due to a wider aperture. |
Main Camera Sensor | Unknown | Sony IMX686 Exmor RS | Poco F4 GT may have better image quality and low-light performance with a Sony sensor. |
Main Camera Pixel Size | Not Specified | 0.80 µm | The Poco F4 GT sensor has a fixed Pixel Size. The Pixel size for Samsung Galaxy A32 is unknown. |
Selfie Camera Resolution | 20MP | 20MP | Same resolution for social media-ready selfies. |
Selfie Camera Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 | The Galaxy A32 may perform slightly better in low-light selfies. |
Selfie Camera Sensor | Not Specified | Sony IMX596 | Poco F4 GT has a Sony Sensor for Selfie camera. |
Selfie Camera Pixel Size | Not Specified | 0.80 µm | The Poco F4 GT sensor has a fixed Pixel Size. The Pixel size for Samsung Galaxy A32 is unknown. |
Wide Angle Lens | 8MP, f/2.2 | 8MP, f/2.2 | Similar wide-angle cameras for capturing more of a scene. |
Wide Angle Lens Sensor | Not Specified | Omnivision OV8856 | Poco F4 GT has an Omnivision sensor for the wide angle lens. |
Wide Angle Lens Pixel Size | Not Specified | 1.12 µm | Poco F4 GT has a fixed pixel size. Pixel Size for Samsung A32 is unknown. |
Portrait Mode | 5MP, f/2.4 | None | The Galaxy A32 has a dedicated depth sensor for portrait shots. |
Macro Lens | 5MP, f/2.4 | 2MP, f/2.4 | The Galaxy A32 offers slightly higher resolution macro shots. |
Video | 1080p@30fps | Up to 4K@60fps | The Poco F4 GT records higher-resolution and smoother video. |
Slow Motion | 30 fps | 960 fps | The Poco F4 GT allows for more dramatic slow-motion effects. |
Camera Features | Standard Features | Advanced Features | The Poco F4 GT has more advanced features like gimbal stabilization and 4K video recording. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A32 Advantages
- Lighter and More Compact: Easier to handle and carry, especially for those with smaller hands.
- Larger Battery (Marginally): May offer slightly longer battery life for general use.
- Dedicated Depth Sensor: Offers a specific camera for Portrait shots.
- Higher Resolution Macro Lens: Slightly more detailed macro shots.
- Lower cost: Usually more affordable.
- Slightly Better Selfie Aperture: Better low-light selfie performance.
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Advantages
- Significantly Faster Performance: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is much more powerful, leading to a snappier experience in all tasks, especially gaming.
- Smoother Display: 120Hz refresh rate makes scrolling and gaming more fluid and responsive.
- Much Faster Charging: 120W fast charging means less time plugged in and more time using the phone.
- Superior Video Recording: Can record in 4K at 60fps, with more slow-motion options and better stabilization.
- Better Main Camera Sensor: The Sony sensor is likely to provide better image quality.
- More Advanced Features: Includes features like Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, better Bluetooth and Wifi versions, Stereo Speakers, 3 microphones, and much more advanced camera features.
- Higher RAM: Better multitasking capabilities.
- Better Build Quality The Xiaomi Poco F4 GT has a screen with Corning Gorilla Glass Victus protection.
Trade-offs
- Galaxy A32: The trade-off for being more affordable is significantly less performance, a less advanced camera system, and slower charging.
- Poco F4 GT: The trade-off for its high performance and features is a higher price, larger size and weight, a slightly smaller battery, and no depth sensor.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A32
- Ideal User: Budget-conscious individuals, casual users, those who prioritize battery life, and people who prefer a lighter, smaller phone.
- Use Cases:
- Everyday social media browsing and texting.
- Casual photography and selfies.
- Longer battery life for all-day usage without the need for quick charging.
- Basic gaming and multimedia consumption.
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
- Ideal User: Gamers, power users, content creators, and those who prioritize performance above all else.
- Use Cases:
- High-end mobile gaming with demanding graphics.
- Video editing and content creation.
- Multitasking with multiple apps.
- High-quality video recording.
- Anyone who wants a fast, smooth, and feature-rich smartphone experience.
- Price-to-Value Ratio: The Poco F4 GT offers significantly better performance and features for the price, making it a better value for power users. The A32 is a better value for budget conscious users.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- What is your primary use case? (Gaming, photography, social media, etc.)
- What is your budget? (How much are you willing to spend on performance and features?)
- What factors do you prioritize? (Battery, display quality, speed, camera, size, etc.)
Scenario-Based Recommendations
- Scenario 1: If you need a reliable phone for basic daily use and value battery life, the Samsung Galaxy A32 is a solid, affordable choice.
- Scenario 2: If you are a gamer or need a phone for demanding tasks and value high performance, fast charging, and premium features, the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT is the clear winner.
- Scenario 3: If you are looking for a good balance between cost and performance and don't care as much about gaming, the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT is still a better value due to better features.
What I Would Choose and Why
Personally, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT.
While I appreciate the lightweight design and slightly larger battery of the Samsung Galaxy A32, my primary use case involves a mix of demanding tasks, including occasional gaming, video editing, and social media browsing. The sheer performance advantage offered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in the Poco F4 GT is too significant to ignore. The 120Hz refresh rate and fast charging are also major draws. I prefer a smoother, more fluid experience, which is where the Poco F4 GT excels. Although it may be heavier, the performance, faster charging and camera improvements justify the trade-offs.