Smartphone Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 vs. Xiaomi Poco C65
1. Specifications Comparison
Here's a detailed comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A32 and Xiaomi Poco C65, focusing on practical implications:
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 | Xiaomi Poco C65 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 158.9 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm | 168 x 78 x 8.1 mm | Poco C65 is larger and slightly thinner, might be less comfortable for one-handed use. A32 is more compact. |
| Weight | 184g | 192g | A32 is slightly lighter, potentially more comfortable during long use. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.4" | 6.74" | Poco C65 offers a larger viewing area, better for media consumption and gaming. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1600 | A32 has a much sharper display, clearer text and images, superior overall viewing experience. |
| PPI | 411 | 260 | A32 has significantly higher pixel density, leading to much sharper visuals. |
| Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | A32's AMOLED provides superior contrast, deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and better power efficiency. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 90Hz | Both offer smooth scrolling, identical user experience in this regard. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Both phones have unknown peak brightness, making it difficult to evaluate outdoor visibility performance. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Helio G80 | Helio G85 | G85 in Poco C65 offers slightly better performance for everyday tasks and gaming. |
| AnTuTu Score | 200,458 | 237,768 | Poco C65 is slightly faster for apps and games, but the difference isn't substantial. |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 | Both have the same GPU, but different configurations, resulting in similar graphical performance for most tasks |
| Camera | |||
| Standard Camera | 64.2MP f/1.8 | 50MP f/1.8 | A32 has higher resolution for capturing more detailed photos. |
| Selfie Camera | 20MP f/2.2 | 8MP f/2.2 | A32 takes higher-resolution selfies with more detail. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 8MP f/2.2 | None | A32 provides the flexibility of wide-angle photos. |
| Portrait (Depth) | 5MP f/2.4 | 2MP f/2.4 | A32 has more detailed depth information for portrait photos. |
| Macro Lens | 5MP f/2.4 | 2MP f/2.4 | A32 has higher resolution for close-up macro shots. |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps | Both offer similar standard video recording, but Poco C65 has 120fps slow motion, A32 doesnt have it. |
| Features | Digital zoom, Quadruple camera, Autofocus, Touch focus, Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer | 4K Video, Digital zoom, Triple camera, Digital image stabilization, Autofocus, Touch focus, Continuous shooting, Geotagging, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer, RAW | A32 has wide angle lens and panorama mode, Poco C65 has 4k video, better slow motion and RAW |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Both offer similar battery life. |
| Charging | Li-Ion | 18W Fast Charging, Li-Polymer | Poco C65 charges significantly faster due to 18W fast charging. |
| Features | Non-removable | Reverse charging, Non-removable | Poco C65 can act as a power bank, A32 does not offer that feature |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11, Max 13 | Android 13 | Poco C65 ships with a newer version of Android, more updated software and possibly longer support from Google |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | 802.11ac | 802.11ac | Both offer similar Wi-Fi capabilities. |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.3 LE | Poco C65 uses a newer Bluetooth standard with better battery efficiency, and added features. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 64GB/128GB | 128GB/256GB | Poco C65 offers up to 256 GB of internal storage, great for those who store lots of photos, videos, and apps. |
| RAM | 4GB/6GB/8GB | 4GB/6GB/8GB | Both come in multiple variants, allowing different budget and usage requirements. |
| Expandable | No | No | Neither supports expandable storage. |
| Security | |||
| Fingerprint | basic fingerprint sensor | side-mounted | Poco C65 features a more convenient and faster side-mounted fingerprint sensor. |
| Sensors | Biometric: Fingerprint; Proximity: Proximity; Motion: Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope | Biometric: Fingerprint; Motion: Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope; Proximity: Ultrasonic proximity virtual | Both have a good suite of sensors, both support gaming, A32 additionally offers Hall, Geomagnetic sensors. Poco C65 offers virtual proximity. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A32 Advantages:
- Superior Display: The AMOLED display with higher resolution and PPI offers significantly better visual clarity, color accuracy, and contrast.
- Better Cameras: Higher-resolution main, selfie, wide-angle, portrait, and macro lenses capture more detail in photos.
- Wide Angle Lens: Offers the ability to take wide angle photos, which the Poco C65 doesn't have.
Xiaomi Poco C65 Advantages:
- Newer Android Version: Comes with Android 13 out-of-the-box, offering the latest features and security updates.
- Faster Charging: Supports 18W fast charging for faster power top-ups.
- Better Performance: A slightly higher AnTuTu score indicates better performance for general use and gaming.
- Bigger Screen: Larger display for more immersive viewing experience.
- Larger Storage Option: A 256 GB storage option, ideal for media hoarders.
- Reverse Charging: Can act as a power bank for other devices.
- Newer Bluetooth version: Bluetooth 5.3 with better battery efficiency and added features
Trade-offs:
- A32: Loses out on the newer features like fast charging, reverse charging, and better performance.
- Poco C65: Loses in display quality, camera quality and lacks a wide angle lens.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A32 Ideal User:
- Visual Enthusiasts: Users who prioritize display quality for media consumption and appreciate vibrant visuals.
- Photography Lovers: Those who frequently capture photos and want better detail and versatility in camera features.
- Users who appreciate a wide angle lens for photography
Specific Use Cases:
- Enjoying movies and videos with deeper blacks and accurate colours.
- Taking high-quality photos for social media, especially selfies and close-up shots.
- Casual browsing, emails, and social media with a high-quality display.
Xiaomi Poco C65 Ideal User:
- Budget-Conscious Users: Users who prioritize value for money and want a fast phone without spending a lot.
- Gamers: Users who need a responsive device, even with a slightly lower resolution.
- Users who prefer a larger screen and newer android version
- Users who want faster charging and reverse charging
- Users who want a larger internal storage option
Specific Use Cases:
- Gaming and running graphic-intensive apps.
- Consuming media on a larger screen.
- Everyday tasks and casual use with a budget-friendly device.
- Users who need a backup power source
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions to Consider:
- Do you prioritize display quality above all else? If yes, the A32's AMOLED is significantly better.
- Are fast charging and newer software features essential? If yes, the Poco C65 is the better choice.
- What are your primary uses? For photography, A32 is superior. For gaming and media consumption, Poco C65 is an option, but the display quality difference will impact it.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Photography Enthusiast: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A32 for its superior cameras, higher resolution photos, and wide angle lens.
- Budget Gamer: Choose the Xiaomi Poco C65 for its slightly better performance, newer Android version, larger screen, and faster charging.
- Everyday User with Media Consumption: If you prioritize display quality and don't require the latest software/charging, the Samsung Galaxy A32 provides a superior experience. If you prioritize a larger screen and battery charging time, and don't mind the display quality and camera differences, the Xiaomi Poco C65 is an option.
My Choice
Personally, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A32. While the Poco C65 has some advantages in terms of performance, fast charging, larger screen and newer OS, the display quality of the AMOLED panel on the A32, along with its superior cameras, makes it a more compelling option for my use case. The visual experience and camera quality are essential for me, and the A32 delivers significantly better results in these categories. While its older software and slower charging may be a trade-off, the superior display and camera performance outweigh those concerns for my preferences.
