1. Specifications Comparison
Design
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 | Samsung Galaxy S24 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 158.9 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm | 147 x 70.6 x 7.6 mm | S24 is noticeably more compact and easier to handle with one hand; A32 is bulkier and may be less comfortable in pockets. |
| Weight | 184g | 167g | S24 is significantly lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use and travel. |
| Build | Unknown | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | S24 screen is more resistant to scratches and accidental drops, offering better long-term durability; A32 screen protection is unknown. |
| Foldable | Standard | Standard | Both are standard, non-folding smartphones. |
Display
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 | Samsung Galaxy S24 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size | 6.4" | 6.2" | A32 has a slightly larger screen which may be more immersive for media consumption; S24 is slightly more compact for portability. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2340 | Both offer sharp, detailed images for general use; The difference is minor and not typically noticeable to the naked eye. |
| Pixel Density | 411 PPI | 416 PPI | Similar pixel densities mean both displays appear sharp, with the S24 having a slight edge. |
| Technology | AMOLED | Unknown | A32's AMOLED display offers better contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially more vibrant colors; S24's display tech is not provided, assuming it's AMOLED or better. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 120Hz | S24 offers slightly smoother scrolling and animations; A32 is smooth but may appear less fluid than the S24, particularly in fast-paced scenarios. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 2600 nits | S24 display is significantly brighter and much more visible in direct sunlight. A32's brightness is unknown; potentially very problematic in bright light conditions. |
Performance
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 | Samsung Galaxy S24 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | S24's chipset is significantly faster, resulting in dramatically better performance in all tasks; A32's chipset will struggle with demanding apps and games and feels slower in general use. |
| AnTuTu Score | 200,458 | 1,639,695 | S24 offers a much smoother, snappier experience, with faster app loading, multitasking, and significantly superior gaming performance; A32 is much slower in comparison. |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 (ARM Mali-G52 2EEMC2) | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) - USA/Canada/China (Xclipse 940) | S24's GPU offers a major boost in graphics processing, leading to better performance in games and graphically intensive apps. |
Camera
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 | Samsung Galaxy S24 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Camera | 64.2MP, f/1.8 | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.57" sensor, Samsung GN3, 1.00 µm pixel size | S24 has slightly lower resolution on paper, but its larger sensor, better pixel size, and high-quality sensor result in superior image quality, especially in low light; A32 has a higher megapixel count but likely inferior overall image quality. |
| Selfie Camera | 20MP, f/2.2 | 12MP, f/2.2, Samsung S5K3LU, pixel size | A32 has higher resolution, but S24's camera likely offers better image quality due to better sensor and pixel size (although the pixel size for the S24 is not specified). |
| Telephoto Lens | None | 10MP, f/2.4, 1/3.9" sensor, Samsung S5K3K1, 1.00 µm pixel size | S24 can zoom in with optical zoom, preserving image quality; A32 lacks this capability, relying on digital zoom which degrades quality. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 8MP, f/2.2 | 12.2MP, f/2.2, 1/2.55" sensor, Sony IMX564, 1.40 µm pixel size | S24 has a wider field of view, potentially capturing better landscape shots and group photos with better detail; S24 has a larger sensor for better light gathering |
| Portrait Mode | 5MP, f/2.4 | None | A32 has dedicated depth camera that can be used for portrait mode; S24 relies on software to achieve a similar effect; the difference will be in detail and depth of the effects. |
| Macro Lens | 5MP, f/2.4 | None | A32 has a dedicated macro lens that can capture close-up details; S24 doesn't have this, meaning it has a higher minimum focus distance |
| Video | 1080p@30fps; No; Slow-motion: No, 30 fps | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps with HDR, EIS, Stereo Sound; Yes; Slow-motion: Yes, 240 fps | S24 supports much higher video resolution and quality and better stabilization, making it suitable for professional-grade video recording; A32 is limited to basic 1080p video recording. S24 has better stabilization and slow motion. |
| Camera Features | Digital zoom, Quadruple camera, Autofocus, Touch focus, Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer | Night Mode 2.0, 4K Video, 8K Video, Digital zoom, Optical zoom, Triple camera, Digital image stabilization, Optical Stabilization (OIS), Autofocus, Touch focus, Phase detection autofocus (PDAF), Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer, RAW | S24 offers many advanced features such as optical zoom, OIS, and RAW capture; A32 has basic camera features that can still get good quality images in good lighting |
Battery
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 | Samsung Galaxy S24 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 4000mAh | A32 has a larger battery, potentially offering longer battery life; S24 battery capacity is less but the Snapdragon chipset and software are more efficient. |
| Charging | Li-Ion | 25W fast charging, Li-Ion | S24 charges faster, allowing for quick power-ups; A32's charging speed is not specified but likely significantly slower, without fast charging support. |
| Battery Features | Non-removable | Bypass Charging, Reverse charging, Non-removable | S24 can be used while charging without affecting battery health, and can reverse charge other devices; A32 lacks these advanced features. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A32 Advantages:
- Larger Battery: 5000mAh battery offers the potential for longer battery life compared to the S24's 4000mAh, if not optimized better.
- Larger Screen: 6.4" display provides slightly more screen real estate for media consumption.
- Dedicated Macro and Depth Cameras: Offers more options for specialized photography.
- Potentially lower price: As an older, lower-end phone, its price will be significantly lower than the S24
Samsung Galaxy S24 Advantages:
- Superior Performance: Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset delivers vastly superior performance for all tasks.
- Significantly Brighter Display: 2600 nits brightness vastly improves outdoor visibility.
- Smoother Display: 120Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations.
- Advanced Camera System: Higher quality images and videos, with optical zoom, OIS, and advanced features like Night Mode 2.0, 8K video recording.
- Faster Charging: 25W fast charging allows for quick power-ups.
- Better Connectivity: Newer Wi-Fi and Bluetooth versions offer faster speeds and better stability.
- Superior Build Quality: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 screen protection for improved durability.
- More Modern Features: Bypass charging, reverse charging, more up to date software.
Trade-offs:
- A32:
- Significantly slower performance, less future proof
- Lower display brightness, not ideal for bright conditions
- Basic camera system with less flexibility
- Bulkier design, less comfortable for one-handed use.
- S24:
- Smaller battery than the A32 (though potentially more efficient)
- No dedicated macro or depth cameras for photography enthusiasts.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A32:
- Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and media consumption.
- Use Cases:
- Casual users who mainly use the phone for browsing, social media, and streaming.
- Users who want a larger screen for reading and video viewing, regardless of quality.
- Individuals who need a phone with a macro lens and depth sensor.
- Users who need a more affordable device and don't require the latest features.
- Price-to-Value: Offers good value for basic needs at a lower price, but compromises heavily on performance and advanced features.
Samsung Galaxy S24:
- Ideal User: Performance-focused users who want a premium experience, content creators, and photography enthusiasts.
- Use Cases:
- Gamers who need a smooth, responsive device for demanding games.
- Users who want to capture high-quality photos and videos in various conditions.
- Users who require fast charging and the latest connectivity options.
- Professionals who need a reliable device for work with a high-quality display.
- Users who need a phone that is more portable and easier to hold one-handed.
- Price-to-Value: Justifies its high price with top-tier performance, advanced features, and premium build quality; offers a more future-proof option.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- What is your budget? The A32 will be significantly cheaper than the S24; Price is a major deciding factor.
- How important is performance and gaming? If top-tier speed and gaming are important, the S24 is the clear choice. The A32 is sufficient only for basic tasks.
- How important is camera quality and features? The S24's camera system is superior overall, better at videos and photos in low light, offering better stabilization and more features. The A32 takes good photos in good lighting, but the S24 is far more versatile.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: A user on a tight budget who primarily uses their phone for social media and streaming.
- Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A32 is the best choice as it provides a good screen and long battery life at a lower cost.
- Scenario 2: A user who frequently plays mobile games and takes photos regularly.
- Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy S24 is the superior choice, offering much better performance, a brighter display, advanced camera features, and a more durable build.
- Scenario 3: A user that needs long battery life, but not bothered about a flagship camera or build.
- Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A32 is the recommended phone, with its potentially much longer battery life at the cost of having slower performance.
My Choice
If I were choosing between the Samsung Galaxy A32 and the Samsung Galaxy S24, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy S24. While the A32 offers a larger battery and potentially lower price, the S24's advantages in almost every other key area are too significant to ignore. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset provides a much smoother, more responsive experience, and the vastly superior display is much better for outdoor visibility and overall visual quality. The camera system on the S24 is more versatile and has better image quality in low light with advanced recording capabilities. Although the A32 has a larger battery, the S24's battery life is still decent, and the 25W fast charging makes topping up the battery quick and easy. Also, for long term usage, the S24 is much more future-proof. Overall, the S24 offers a much better experience that justifies the higher price.
