1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 | Samsung Galaxy M35 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 158.9 × 73.6 × 8.4 mm | 162.3 × 78.6 × 9.1 mm | M35 is larger and thicker, potentially less comfortable in hand. A32 is more compact and easier to handle. |
| Weight | 184g | 222g | A32 is significantly lighter, better for extended use and single-handed operation; M35 might feel hefty. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.4" | 6.6" | M35 offers a slightly larger screen, potentially better for media consumption and gaming; A32 slightly smaller, may be preferable for those who prefer compact phones |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2340 | Virtually identical sharpness for everyday use; Minimal visual difference. |
| PPI | 411 | 390 | A32 has slightly sharper display, which would barely be noticeable to the naked eye in most cases |
| Technology | AMOLED | AMOLED | Both offer vibrant colors, deep blacks, and excellent contrast |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 120Hz | M35 provides smoother scrolling and animations; more fluid visual experience. A32 provides a fluid experience, just not as smooth as the M35 |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Both share the same peak brightness which suggests identical outdoor visibility. It is unusual that both phones have 0 nits brightness in the specifications. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 (12 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) | M35 offers significantly faster performance and better energy efficiency. M35 is much better for demanding tasks. |
| AnTuTu Score | 200,458 | 578,500 | M35 provides significantly better app loading, multitasking, and gaming. A32 may struggle with heavier apps and games; M35 offers much better performance. |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G68 MP5 | M35 has a more powerful GPU for better graphics performance. M35 is much better suited for gaming. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 6000mAh | M35 offers significantly longer battery life, could be a day and a half to two full days, depending on usage. |
| Charging | Li-Ion | 25W Fast Charging, Li-Ion | M35 charges much faster, reducing downtime. A32 is slower to charge. |
| Camera | |||
| Standard Camera | 64.2MP, f/1.8 | 50MP, f/1.8, Sony LYT-600, 1/2", 1.00 µm | A32 has higher resolution but M35 has a larger sensor with bigger pixels for better low-light performance and image quality. |
| Selfie Camera | 20MP, f/2.2 | 13MP, f/2.2, 1.12 µm | A32 has a higher-resolution selfie camera, but M35 has larger pixels which might result in slightly better low light performance. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 8MP, f/2.2 | 8MP, f/2.2 | Both offer similar wide-angle capabilities. |
| Portrait Camera | 5MP, f/2.4 | None | A32 has a dedicated depth sensor for portrait mode; M35 relies on software. |
| Macro Camera | 5MP, f/2.4 | 2MP, f/2.4 | A32 offers a slightly higher resolution macro camera for better close up shots. |
| Video Recording | 1080p@30fps, No Stabilization | 4K@30fps with EIS, 1080p@30/60fps with EIS, 720p@480fps with EIS, Yes Stabilization | M35 offers significantly better video recording capabilities with higher resolution (4K), smoother footage with EIS and slow motion options. |
| Camera Features | Quadruple camera | Triple camera, 2x2 OCL, Pro Video Mode, 4K Video, Digital image stabilization, Optical Stabilization (OIS), Ultra stable video, AutoFraming, All Pixel Omni- Directional PDAF, NPU AI Engine, Night Mode, RAW 12 bits, DOL HDR | M35 offers a plethora of video and photo features including 4K recording and OIS. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (Upgradable to 13) | Android 14 | M35 has a newer OS version out-of-the-box, offering potentially longer software support. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 | M35 has a newer WiFi standard with faster and more stable internet. |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 with aptX Adaptive and LDAC | M35 has a newer Bluetooth with better audio codecs for higher quality wireless audio. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | M35 supports more satellite systems for more precise location tracking. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal Storage | 64GB or 128GB | 128GB or 256GB | M35 offers higher storage options, better for storing photos, videos, and games. |
| RAM | 4GB, 6GB, 8GB | 6GB, 8GB | Both phones offer various RAM options for multitasking. M35 has more RAM overall (6GB/8GB versus 4GB/6GB/8GB). |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phone offers expandable storage, may be limiting for heavy media users. |
| Audio | |||
| Audio Features | Basic audio features | Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers | M35 offers superior audio quality, with immersive spatial audio, high-resolution playback, and better sound staging. |
| Security | |||
| Biometrics | Basic fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | M35's side-mounted sensor is generally faster and more convenient to reach than the A32's sensor, which we do not know the exact implementation. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Screen Protection | Unknown | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | M35 is significantly more durable with superior screen protection. |
| Sensors | Proximity, Compass | Ultrasonic proximity virtual | Samsung Galaxy A32 has a standard proximity sensor and a compass. Samsung Galaxy M35 has a virtual proximity sensor and lacks the compass. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A32 Advantages:
- More compact and lighter design: Easier to handle and carry, particularly for users with smaller hands.
- Slightly higher resolution front camera: May offer slightly more detailed selfie shots in good lighting conditions.
- Dedicated depth sensor: Potentially better portrait photos with real depth information.
- Compass sensor Standard Proximity Sensor.
Samsung Galaxy M35 Advantages:
- Significantly faster performance: The Exynos 1380 chipset provides a much smoother experience for daily tasks and gaming.
- Significantly longer battery life: The 6000mAh battery offers better endurance.
- Faster 25W charging: Quicker charging, less time waiting for the phone to be ready.
- Superior video capabilities: 4K video recording, EIS, and slow motion, making it great for vlogging and capturing memorable moments.
- Newer operating system: Android 14 offers the latest features and potential for longer software support.
- Newer Bluetooth and WiFi Standards: Faster and more stable connectivity.
- Better audio: Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, and Stereo Speakers offer superior audio experience.
- More versatile camera system including OIS.
- More premium screen protection: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus for better durability and scratch resistance.
- Side-mounted Fingerprint sensor Side-mounted is generally faster and more convenient.
- More internal storage.
Significant Trade-offs:
- The A32 prioritizes a more compact design and slightly better selfie camera over raw performance and video capabilities.
- The M35 is significantly larger and heavier, which may not be suitable for all users. It also lacks a depth sensor and a compass.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A32 - Ideal User:
- Users who prefer a more compact and lightweight phone.
- Budget-conscious buyers who prioritize a good selfie camera.
- Users with less intensive tasks and limited gaming.
- Users who don't record videos.
Samsung Galaxy A32 - Use Cases:
- Casual browsing, social media, and basic productivity.
- Taking selfies and casual snapshots in good light conditions.
- Comfortable single-handed usage and carrying in pockets.
Samsung Galaxy M35 - Ideal User:
- Power users who value performance and battery life.
- Gamers who need smooth performance and responsiveness.
- Content creators who require high-quality video recording.
- Users who consume a lot of media who will appreciate the better audio system.
- Users who want a phone that will last and receive longer software updates.
Samsung Galaxy M35 - Use Cases:
- Gaming and running demanding apps smoothly.
- Extended use throughout the day without frequent charging.
- Recording high-quality 4K videos and using advanced camera features.
- Immersive multimedia consumption with superior audio.
Price-to-Value Ratio:
- The Galaxy A32 will likely be the more budget-friendly option, suitable for users with basic needs.
- The Galaxy M35 may be more expensive, but offers significantly better value for power users seeking performance and features.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- How important is battery life and performance to me? (A32 is good for basics, M35 is better for performance/battery)
- How important are advanced video recording capabilities and OIS for me? (A32 lacks advanced video and OIS, M35 has both)
- Do I prefer a smaller and lighter phone, or a larger screen with better performance and audio? (A32 compact, M35 Larger)
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Budget User, Basic Needs: If budget is the primary concern and needs are basic, the Galaxy A32 is sufficient.
- Scenario 2: Power User, Gaming: If performance, battery life, and advanced features are important, the Galaxy M35 is the better choice.
- Scenario 3: Content Creator, Vlogging: The Galaxy M35 is superior for video recording, with 4K support, EIS, and a much better stabilization.
- Scenario 4: Compact Design Fan: If a small, light phone is the priority, the Galaxy A32 is the only choice, but know you are giving up alot.
My Choice:
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would definitely choose the Samsung Galaxy M35. The performance difference is huge, the camera system is much more versatile, and the larger battery with fast charging, all while having newer versions of software, bluetooth and wifi, all justify the increase in price. While the A32 has a smaller size, higher front camera resolution and a depth sensor, these do not outweigh the M35's advantages by any measure. The M35's features like 4K video recording with EIS, OIS, and a 120Hz display make it a much more complete and versatile device for modern users. The additional protection of Gorilla Glass Victus is also a big plus.
