Samsung Galaxy A32 vs Samsung Galaxy A72 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 25, 2021 March 26, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 98.24 cm³ 107.28 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.48 "/g 3.3 "/g
Weight 184 g 203 g
Height 158.9 mm 165 mm
Width 73.6 mm 77.4 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.6 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 411 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.9 mAh/cm³ 46.61 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Adreno 618

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 13 12

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A32 and Samsung Galaxy A72, focusing on practical implications:

Design

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32Samsung Galaxy A72Practical Impact
Dimensions158.9 × 73.6 × 8.4 mm165 × 77.4 × 8.4 mmA72 is taller and wider, making it feel larger in hand and less pocketable.
Weight184g203gA32 is significantly lighter, more comfortable for extended use.
Build MaterialNot SpecifiedNot SpecifiedWithout this info, material robustness and feel of each phone remains unknown.

Display

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32Samsung Galaxy A72Practical Impact
Size6.4"6.7"A72 provides a more immersive viewing experience for media consumption.
Resolution1080x24001080x2400Both offer sharp visuals, indistinguishable in normal use.
PPI411394Both have a very similar pixel density, resulting in a comparable viewing experience.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzSmooth scrolling and animations on both devices.
Brightness0 nits800 nitsA72 screen is much easier to view outdoors in bright sunlight, while A32 likely suffers in comparison.

Performance

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32Samsung Galaxy A72Practical Impact
ChipsetMediatek Helio G80 (12 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8 nm)A72 offers better app performance and responsiveness due to its more advanced and efficient chip.
AnTuTu Score200,458285,000A72 has significantly better performance in benchmarks; noticeable difference in loading times and multitasking.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Adreno 618A72's GPU results in better graphics performance, better gaming experience.

Camera

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32Samsung Galaxy A72Practical Impact
Standard Camera64.2MP, f/1.864MP, f/1.8, 0.80µm pixelsSimilar primary camera in quality; subtle difference in sensor size, A72 has larger pixels.
Telephoto + PortraitN/A8MP, f/2.4, 1/4.4", 1.00µm pixelsA72 has dedicated zoom capabilities and better portrait shots.
Selfie Camera20MP, f/2.232MP, f/2.2, 0.80µm pixelsA72 offers higher resolution for clearer and more detailed selfies.
Wide Angle Lens8MP, f/2.212MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm pixelsA72 captures more details and wider shots.
Portrait Mode (Depth)5MP, f/2.4N/AA32 has a dedicated depth sensor for background blurring.
Macro Lens5MP, f/2.45MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm pixelsComparable macro capabilities on both, but A72 captures better light.
Video1080p@30fps, No EIS, No Slow-mo4K@30fps with EIS, 1080p@30/60fps with EIS, Yes Slow-moA72 has much better video capabilities: higher resolution, smoother footage, and slow-motion.
DxOMark ScoreN/A92 (Photo: 100, Video: 78)A72 is a significantly better camera overall.
Additional Camera FeaturesDigital zoom, Quadruple camera, Autofocus, Touch focus, Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timerDigital zoom, Optical zoom, Quadruple camera, Digital image stabilization, Optical Stabilization (OIS), Autofocus, Touch focus, Manual focus, Phase detection autofocus (PDAF), Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer, Night ModeA72 offers advanced options for better image and video capture.

Battery

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32Samsung Galaxy A72Practical Impact
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery life for both devices.
ChargingLi-Ion25W fast charging, Li-IonA72 charges much faster, which is more convenient.
FeaturesNon-removableNon-removable, 15W Fast Charger includedBoth have non-removable batteries; A72 includes a fast charger.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A32 Advantages:

  • Lighter and More Compact: More comfortable for one-handed use and pocketable.
  • Lower Cost: Typically more affordable, making it an entry-level friendly option.
  • Depth sensor: Dedicated depth sensor for more accurate bokeh shots, although the A72 is no slouch in this department.

Samsung Galaxy A72 Advantages:

  • Larger, Brighter Display: Better viewing experience, especially outdoors.
  • More Powerful Processor: Faster performance for apps, games, and multitasking.
  • Superior Cameras: Telephoto lens, higher resolution selfie/wide angle, OIS, and advanced video capabilities.
  • Faster Charging: Quicker battery top-ups with 25W fast charging.
  • Dolby Atmos and Stereo Speakers: Better audio experience for media consumption.
  • Larger Storage Option: Up to 256GB internal storage for more media and apps.
  • Included 15W charger: Convenience of fast charging straight out the box

Practical Implications & Trade-Offs:

  • A32: Offers better portability and is easier on the wallet; trade off is a significant downgrade in performance and camera versatility.
  • A72: Provides a superior overall experience, particularly for media, gaming, and photography; the trade-off is a heavier device and higher cost.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A32

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users, those who prioritize portability, and those with basic smartphone needs.
  • Use Cases: Casual browsing, social media, basic photography, calls, and messaging.
  • Price-to-Value: Good entry-level value given it is cheaper and still offers most basic features.

Samsung Galaxy A72

  • Ideal User: Users who prioritize media consumption, photography/videography enthusiasts, and those who need good performance for gaming or multitasking.
  • Use Cases: Watching videos, mobile gaming, social media with detailed photography, travel photography, and professional use.
  • Price-to-Value: Higher value for those who prioritize better performance and multimedia capabilities; might be a bit expensive for basic users.

4. Decision Framework

Here are key questions for potential buyers:

  1. Budget: How much am I willing to spend on a phone?
  2. Primary Use Case: Will I use the phone mostly for basic tasks, or media consumption and gaming?
  3. Camera Importance: Is a versatile camera system a priority for me?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Tight Budget & Basic Needs - Choose the Galaxy A32. It offers decent performance for the price and is lighter, perfect for basic use.

  • Scenario 2: Media Consumption and Camera Priority - Choose the Galaxy A72. It provides a superior display, better camera, and better performance.

  • Scenario 3: Balanced Performance & Portability - Both have their trade-offs. If performance is slightly more important pick the A72, but if portability is more important go for the A32.

My Choice

If I had to choose, I would pick the Samsung Galaxy A72. Here's why:

  • Better Overall Experience: While the A32 is lighter and more affordable, the A72 provides a far superior experience that addresses the main use cases of a smartphone today: media consumption, good camera performance and decent performance.
  • Future-Proofing: The A72's Snapdragon 720G chipset and better camera system will remain relevant for longer.
  • Practical Advantages: The significantly higher screen brightness, faster charging, better sound and better camera quality make it much more appealing in everyday use. The convenience of a included 15W charger is also a bonus.

Although the A72 is pricier and bulkier, the benefits it offers in my opinion justify the price increase, unless budget is a major restriction.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.