Samsung Galaxy A32 vs Realme GT Neo 3 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 25, 2021 March 30, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 98.24 cm³ 101.23 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.48 "/g 3.56 "/g
Weight 184 g 188 g
Height 158.9 mm 163.3 mm
Width 73.6 mm 75.6 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • Plain Black (Asphalt Black)
  • Silverstone White (Sprint White)
  • Le Mans Blue (Nitro Blue)

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.6 % 87.5 %
Pixel Density 411 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.9 mAh/cm³ 49.39 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G610 MC6

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 13 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32Realme GT Neo 3Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions158.9 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm163.3 x 75.6 x 8.2 mmRealme GT Neo 3 is slightly larger and thinner; May impact one-handed use and pocketability.
Weight184g188gVirtually identical weight, negligible difference in hand.
Display
Size6.4"6.7"Realme GT Neo 3 offers a slightly larger viewing area; Better for media consumption and gaming.
Resolution1080x24001080x2412Nearly identical sharpness; Both offer crisp images.
Pixel Density411 PPI394 PPIVery similar; No noticeable difference in display sharpness for most users.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth have vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzRealme GT Neo 3 provides smoother scrolling and animations; More fluid experience in apps and games.
Brightness0 nits1000 nitsRealme GT Neo 3 is significantly brighter and more visible in direct sunlight; Samsung Galaxy A32 brightness is unknown, likely making it difficult to view under bright light.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G80 (12 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm)Realme GT Neo 3 offers drastically better performance; Noticeably faster app loading, multitasking, and gaming due to its superior chipset with smaller process node.
AnTuTu Score200,458855,842Realme GT Neo 3 is significantly faster in benchmarks; indicates faster performance in everyday tasks and resource-intensive apps.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G610 MC6Realme GT Neo 3 has a much more powerful GPU; Significantly better gaming performance and smoother graphics in demanding applications.
Camera
Rear Main64MP f/1.850MP f/1.88, 1/1.56" sensorRealme GT Neo 3 has larger sensor, likely better low-light performance; Samsung offers slightly higher resolution.
Front Camera20MP f/2.216MP f/2.45, 1/3.1" sensorSamsung Galaxy A32 has slightly higher resolution; Both should capture good quality selfies, though sensor size will play a factor.
Wide Angle8MP f/2.28MP f/2.25, 1/2.8" sensorSimilar specs; Minor differences in aperture and sensor size.
Portrait (Depth)5MP f/2.4N/ASamsung Galaxy A32 has a dedicated depth sensor for portrait photos.
Macro Lens5MP f/2.42MP f/2.4, 1/5" sensorSamsung Galaxy A32 offers better macro resolution; Minor differences in aperture.
Video1080p@30fps4K@60fps, EISRealme GT Neo 3 offers significantly better video quality and stabilization; Provides far superior video recording capabilities.
FeaturesQuad, Digital zoomTriple, OIS, EIS, 4K, RAWRealme GT Neo 3 has more advanced features; Offers better image stabilization and more professional video recording options.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery capacity; Should offer comparable battery life.
ChargingLi-Ion80W Fast Charging, Li-PolymerRealme GT Neo 3 charges much faster; Substantially less time spent plugged in. Has dual battery setup.
FeaturesNon-removableNon-removable, Dual BatteryBoth are non-removable; Realme GT Neo 3 has dual battery design, which may improve charging speed and longevity.
Software
OSAndroid 11, up to 13Android 12, up to 13Realme GT Neo 3 has a slightly newer base version of Android; Both should receive the same max version of Android.
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Realme GT Neo 3 supports the latest Wi-Fi standard; Faster, more efficient, and better performance in crowded networks.
Bluetooth5.05.3 LERealme GT Neo 3 has a newer version; Improved battery efficiency and performance for compatible devices.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, L1+L5Realme GT Neo 3 supports more satellite systems and dual-band; Provides more accurate and faster GPS positioning.
SIMDual SIMDual SIMBoth support dual SIM functionality.
Storage
Internal64GB or 128GB128GB, 256GB, or 512GBRealme GT Neo 3 offers significantly more internal storage options; More space for media, apps, and files.
RAM4GB, 6GB, or 8GB6GB, 8GB, or 12GBRealme GT Neo 3 offers more RAM options; Better multitasking capabilities, especially for the 12 GB option.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone offers expandable storage; Users must rely solely on internal storage.
Audio
QualityBasic audio featuresDolby Atmos, Hi-Res AudioRealme GT Neo 3 provides a superior audio experience; Better for music listening, movies, and gaming with more enhanced features.
Security
FeaturesFingerprint sensorFingerprint sensorBoth provide basic fingerprint security.
Build Quality
ProtectionUnknownCorning Gorilla Glass 5Realme GT Neo 3 offers superior screen protection against scratches and drops.
SensorsAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity, FingerprintAccelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, FingerprintSamsung Galaxy A32 includes a Compass sensor. Both have necessary sensors for their features.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A32 Advantages:

  • Dedicated Depth Sensor: Offers a dedicated 5MP depth sensor for better portrait photos, which Realme GT Neo 3 lacks.
  • Slightly Higher Resolution Main & Selfie Cameras: Boasts a 64MP main sensor and a 20MP selfie camera for potentially more detailed images, though sensor size is more relevant.
  • Compass Sensor: Includes a compass sensor, which can be useful for navigation and certain apps.

Realme GT Neo 3 Advantages:

  • Significantly Superior Performance: The Dimensity 8100 chipset provides much faster processing, better gaming performance, and smoother multitasking. The Antutu benchmark score speaks volumes.
  • Much Brighter Display: 1000 nits brightness provides dramatically better outdoor visibility in direct sunlight, while the A32's brightness is not available.
  • Smoother 120Hz Display: Offers smoother animations and scrolling compared to the 90Hz display on the A32.
  • Faster 80W Charging: Rapidly charges the phone, reducing downtime and ensuring it is ready to use faster.
  • Significantly Better Video Recording: Capable of recording 4K video at 60fps with EIS (Electronic Image Stabilization), offering far superior quality and stability.
  • More Advanced Camera Features: OIS (Optical Image Stabilization), RAW capture and superior low-light performance, resulting in higher-quality photos.
  • Significantly More Storage & RAM Options: Up to 512GB of internal storage and 12GB of RAM, providing ample space for files and apps, and smoother multitasking.
  • Superior Audio: Includes features like Dolby Atmos and Hi-Res audio, delivering a noticeably better audio experience.
  • Newer Wi-Fi & Bluetooth: Supports newer standards (Wi-Fi 6 & Bluetooth 5.3), resulting in better connectivity.
  • Superior screen protection: Features Corning Gorilla Glass 5 compared to an unknown screen protection.

Trade-offs:

  • Samsung A32 Trade-off: Loses out on performance, display quality, charging speeds and advanced features.
  • Realme GT Neo 3 Trade-off: Lacks a dedicated depth sensor for portrait photos, and slightly lower resolution on the front camera.
  • Realme GT Neo 3 Trade-off: Is slightly larger, which may be less comfortable for some people, though is negligibly different in weight

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A32:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who prioritize a good display over raw performance and need decent camera capabilities, and those who prefer a dedicated depth sensor.
  • Use Cases:
    • Casual smartphone use (browsing, social media).
    • Basic photography and video.
    • Users who appreciate the slightly smaller physical size.
    • Users who need a compass sensor.
  • Price-to-Value: If significantly cheaper, it may provide adequate features for light users, however, the performance is not up to par in comparison to the GT Neo 3.

Realme GT Neo 3:

  • Ideal User: Performance-oriented users, gamers, and content creators who want fast performance, great display, and advanced camera features.
  • Use Cases:
    • Gaming and demanding apps.
    • High-quality photography and videography.
    • Heavy multitasking.
    • Those who want faster charging and superior battery endurance.
    • Media consumption.
  • Price-to-Value: Offers high value for users seeking premium performance, advanced features, and better overall user experience.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is performance? If you need a phone that can handle demanding games, apps, and multitasking, the Realme GT Neo 3 is the clear choice. The Samsung Galaxy A32 may struggle.
  2. What are your camera priorities? If you need high-quality photos and videos in different scenarios, the Realme GT Neo 3's features and sensor size will provide a more premium experience. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a depth sensor, however.
  3. What's your budget? If budget is the absolute top concern, the Samsung Galaxy A32 might be considered if priced significantly lower, understanding the performance limitations and the lacking features such as screen brightness and 80W charging.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Budget-Conscious User: If the Samsung A32 is significantly cheaper and you only need a phone for basic tasks, it may suffice, but the performance limitations are noticiable and it may be better to consider other options at this price point.

  • Performance Enthusiast: The Realme GT Neo 3 is the clear winner for gaming, multitasking, and heavy app usage, with superior charging and screen brightness.

  • Multimedia Creator: The Realme GT Neo 3 is better equipped with its superior video capabilities, RAW capture, and enhanced audio features.
  • Casual User: The Realme GT Neo 3 is still the better phone even for casual use, with its smooth display, significantly better performance and charging, but this would be spending significantly more money than is needed. The Samsung A32 may be a better option if significantly cheaper, understanding its limitations.

My Choice:

I would choose the Realme GT Neo 3. While the Samsung Galaxy A32 offers a dedicated depth sensor and slightly higher resolution on its main and selfie cameras, these advantages are overshadowed by the massive superiority of the Realme GT Neo 3 in almost every other aspect, particularly performance, display quality (brightness and refresh rate), faster charging, superior video capabilities, storage options, and audio. The Realme GT Neo 3 is simply in another league in terms of user experience and would be a much better investment for long-term usage. The significantly higher AnTuTu score and the advancements in video capabilities speak volumes about how far ahead it is. For the majority of users, the trade-offs on the Samsung A32 would not be worth it.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.