Samsung Galaxy A32 vs Oppo Reno11 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 25, 2021 January 25, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 98.24 cm³ 95.32 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.48 "/g 3.68 "/g
Weight 184 g 182 g
Height 158.9 mm 162.4 mm
Width 73.6 mm 74.3 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • Wave Green
  • Rock Grey

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.6 % 89.5 %
Pixel Density 411 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 950 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.9 mAh/cm³ 52.45 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 vs. Oppo Reno11

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32Oppo Reno11Practical Impact
Design
Launch Date2021-02-252024-01-25Oppo Reno11 is significantly newer, benefiting from advancements in technology and software.
Dimensions158.9 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm162.4 x 74.3 x 7.9 mmOppo Reno11 is slightly taller and thinner, potentially feeling more modern and sleek.
Weight184g182gBoth feel similar in hand; negligible difference.
Display
Size6.4"6.7"Oppo Reno11 offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive media consumption and a better viewing experience.
Resolution1080x24001080x2412Both provide a sharp and clear viewing experience, with virtually identical resolution.
PPI411394Both have similar pixel densities and will appear equally sharp to the naked eye.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks typical of AMOLED screens.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzOppo Reno11 provides smoother scrolling and animations, resulting in a more fluid user experience.
Brightness0 nits1400 nitsOppo Reno11's screen is significantly brighter, making it much easier to use outdoors in bright sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)Oppo Reno11's chipset is much more powerful and energy-efficient, providing faster performance and better battery life.
AnTuTu Score200,458923,559Oppo Reno11 provides much faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G68 MC4Oppo Reno11's GPU delivers superior graphics performance for gaming and graphic intensive tasks.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh4800mAhSamsung Galaxy A32 has a marginally larger battery, but differences are unlikely to be significant.
ChargingLi-Ion67W fast charging, Li-PolymerOppo Reno11 offers significantly faster charging (67W), which allows you to quickly get back to full charge.
Battery FeaturesNon-removableNon-removableBoth have non-removable batteries.
Camera
Standard Camera Resolution64.2MP50MPSamsung Galaxy A32 has a higher megapixel count, but this does not always translate to better image quality.
Standard Camera Aperturef/1.8f/1.88Samsung Galaxy A32 has a marginally wider aperture, potentially slightly better in low light but differences likely to be negligible.
Standard Camera SensorUnknownSony LYT-600Oppo Reno11 uses a modern, known high-quality sensor, potentially offering better image quality.
Selfie Camera Resolution20MP32MPOppo Reno11 captures more detailed selfies.
Selfie Camera Aperturef/2.2f/2.4Samsung Galaxy A32 has a slightly wider aperture, potentially better in low light.
Selfie Camera SensorUnknownSony IMX709Oppo Reno11 uses a known high-quality sensor.
Telephoto LensNone32MPOppo Reno11 has a telephoto lens for better zoom capabilities.
Wide Angle Lens Resolution8MP8MPBoth have the same megapixel count.
Wide Angle Lens Aperturef/2.2f/2.2Both have the same aperture.
Wide Angle Lens SensorUnknownSony IMX355Oppo Reno11 uses a known high-quality sensor.
Portrait Mode5MPNoneSamsung Galaxy A32 has a dedicated depth sensor, which can potentially enhance portrait shots
Macro Lens5MPNoneSamsung Galaxy A32 has a dedicated macro sensor to capture close-up shots.
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, up to 1080p@480fpsOppo Reno11 can capture higher resolution and more framerate video for smoother and more detailed videos.
Video StabilisationNoYes (EIS)Oppo Reno11 has EIS providing better stabilization and less shaky videos
Slow MotionNoYesOppo Reno11 can record slow motion video
Camera FeaturesBasic FeaturesAdvanced Features including OIS & RAWOppo Reno11 has advanced features, better image stabilization, and better control.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable to 13)Android 14Oppo Reno11 offers a newer OS out of the box and is likely to receive more future updates.
Connectivity
WiFi802.11a/b/g/n/ac802.11a/b/g/n/ac/axOppo Reno11 supports faster WiFi 6 standard.
Bluetooth5.05.2Oppo Reno11 has a more modern version, with potential improvements for audio quality and energy efficiency
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoOppo Reno11 has support for more satellite systems, offering better location accuracy.
SIMDual SIM Dual StandbyDual SIM Dual StandbyBoth offer the same Dual SIM functionality.
Storage
Internal64GB/128GB256GB/512GBOppo Reno11 offers significantly more internal storage for apps, photos, videos, and other files.
RAM4GB/6GB/8GB8GB/12GBOppo Reno11 offers more RAM for smoother multitasking.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone offers expandable storage.
Audio
Audio QualityBasic audio featuresBasic audio featuresBoth offer basic audio capabilities.
Security
Fingerprint SensorBasicBasicBoth provide basic fingerprint security.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionUnknownUnknownScreen protection details are not available for either device.
Sensors
SensorsAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity, FingerprintAccelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, FingerprintBoth offer common sensor capabilities; Samsung Galaxy A32 has a Compass while Oppo Reno11 has a Gravity sensor.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A32 Advantages:

  • Marginally Larger Battery: Offers a slightly higher battery capacity which might translate to a bit longer usage time.
  • Dedicated Depth and Macro Cameras: Has a dedicated depth sensor for better portrait mode and a macro lens for close-up photography.
  • Compass: Includes a compass sensor.

Practical Implications for Samsung Galaxy A32:

  • The battery advantage is minimal.
  • The extra cameras are very basic and don't have high quality or special features.

Oppo Reno11 Advantages:

  • Newer and Faster Chipset: Provides significantly better performance, faster app loading, and smoother multitasking.
  • Significantly Higher AnTuTu Score: Demonstrates vastly superior performance in benchmarks.
  • Brighter Display: Offers much better visibility in bright sunlight.
  • Smoother Display: 120Hz refresh rate provides a more fluid user experience.
  • Larger Storage Options: Comes with considerably more storage, addressing concerns about storage space.
  • Faster Charging: 67W fast charging significantly reduces charging time.
  • Better Camera System: Modern Sony sensors, a telephoto lens, and advanced video features.
  • More Up-to-date Software: Ships with a newer Android version, providing the latest features and security updates.
  • Advanced Connectivity: Supports Wi-Fi 6 and has more advanced bluetooth capabilities.
  • Gravity Sensor: Includes a gravity sensor.

Practical Implications for Oppo Reno11:

  • Superior performance for any task including demanding games.
  • Much better visibility in sunny conditions.
  • Smoother user interface experience.
  • Fast charging will get you up and running quickly.
  • Better photo and video quality.

Trade-offs:

  • Samsung Galaxy A32: Offers a slightly larger battery, dedicated macro lens, a depth sensor and a compass but has significantly inferior performance, older software, and a lower-quality display.
  • Oppo Reno11: Lacks dedicated depth and macro lenses and does not have a compass, but provides an overall superior experience in terms of performance, camera, display, and software.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Ideal User for Samsung Galaxy A32:

  • Budget-Conscious Users: Those who prioritize affordability over cutting-edge performance and features.
  • Basic Smartphone Users: Those whose needs are limited to calls, texts, basic browsing, and light social media use.

Specific Use Cases for Samsung Galaxy A32:

  • Daily driver for basic communication needs.
  • Secondary phone for use as a backup or for a specific task.
  • Users who value a slightly larger battery life.

Ideal User for Oppo Reno11:

  • Power Users: Users who need fast performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding apps.
  • Multimedia Consumers: Users who prioritize a great display for watching videos and playing games.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who want good quality photos and videos in various conditions.
  • Users Who Value Speed and Modern Tech: Those who want a fast-charging, up-to-date device with the latest features.

Specific Use Cases for Oppo Reno11:

  • Daily driver for power users who rely on smartphones for work and entertainment.
  • Casual mobile gaming and streaming media consumption.
  • Capturing high-quality photos and videos for content creation.
  • Users who need a fast charging phone.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your primary use case? (Basic communication, media, gaming, photography, etc.)
  2. How much do you prioritize performance? (Are you okay with basic performance, or do you need a fast phone?)
  3. How important are camera quality and video features? (Do you need a great camera, or will basic quality suffice?)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Budget-Limited User: If the budget is the primary concern and basic usage is the goal, the Samsung Galaxy A32 is an option. However, the Oppo Reno11 would still be better overall given the massive improvements it offers.
  • Scenario 2: Performance-Focused User: If you need a phone that can handle demanding tasks and games, the Oppo Reno11 is the clear choice.
  • Scenario 3: Camera-Centric User: If photography is important, the Oppo Reno11 is much better, offering a telephoto lens and better video capabilities.

My Choice

I would choose the Oppo Reno11. Here's why:

The Oppo Reno11 offers a significantly better user experience overall due to its vastly superior performance, brighter and smoother display, more advanced camera system, faster charging, and up-to-date software. While the Samsung Galaxy A32 might have a slightly larger battery and some additional lenses, these advantages do not outweigh the benefits of the Oppo Reno11. The speed, display quality, camera capabilities, and future-proofing provided by the Reno11 make it a much better investment for the majority of users. The Samsung A32 is outdated, and it does not make sense to invest in it even if it is on the lower price bracket.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.