Samsung Galaxy A32 vs Oppo A96 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A96
Oppo A96
Oppo

General

Launch Date February 25, 2021 March 16, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 98.24 cm³ 104.54 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.48 "/g 3.45 "/g
Weight 184 g 191 g
Height 158.9 mm 164.4 mm
Width 73.6 mm 75.7 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • Starry Black
  • Sunset Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.59 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.6 % 84 %
Pixel Density 411 PPI 401 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 480 nits
HBM Brightness 800 nits 600 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 115.13 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.9 mAh/cm³ 47.83 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Adreno 610

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32Oppo A96Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions158.9 × 73.6 × 8.4 mm164.4 × 75.7 × 8.4 mmOppo A96 is slightly larger and may feel less comfortable for single-hand use. Both have same thickness
Weight184g191gSamsung A32 is slightly lighter, which can be a small benefit for long usage.
Display
Size6.4"6.59"Oppo A96 offers a slightly larger viewing area, beneficial for media consumption.
Resolution1080x24001080x2412Negligible difference, both provide similar sharpness.
Pixel Density411 PPI401 PPIBoth are very similar; difference won't be noticeable.
TechnologyAMOLEDIPS LCDSamsung A32 has better contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially more vibrant colors. AMOLED is also more efficient for dark themes.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animation experiences.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth have identical peak brightness at 0 nits (This is likely incorrect, as brightness is always measured, and zero would mean the screens do not light up. Information is therefore missing)
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G80 (12nm)Snapdragon 680 4G (6nm)Snapdragon 680 is more efficient and provides marginally better performance, especially for light gaming and daily tasks.
AnTuTu Score200,458218,000Oppo A96 benchmarks slightly higher, indicating better overall performance.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Adreno 610Adreno 610 in the Oppo A96 is generally better for gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.
Camera
Main Camera Resolution64.2MP50MPSamsung A32 captures more detailed photos in ideal lighting conditions.
Main Camera Aperturef/1.8f/1.8Both have the same aperture, meaning similar light-gathering capability.
Selfie Camera Resolution20MP16MPSamsung A32 captures more detailed selfies.
Selfie Camera Aperturef/2.2f/2.0Oppo A96's wider aperture allows slightly better low-light selfies.
Wide Angle Lens8MPNoneSamsung A32 offers more versatility for landscape shots and group photos.
Portrait Lens5MP2MPSamsung A32 provides better portrait depth mapping.
Macro Lens5MPNoneSamsung A32 allows for close-up photography.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth phones have similar video recording quality.
Camera FeaturesQuadruple camera, Digital zoomDual Camera, Digital image stabilization, PDAFSamsung A32 provides more lenses for versatile photography, while Oppo A96 has digital stabilization and faster autofocus.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth phones offer similar battery life.
ChargingLi-Ion, no fast charge33W Fast Charging, Li-PolymerOppo A96 charges significantly faster.
Software
OSAndroid 11, upgradable to 13Android 11Samsung is confirmed to have software support up to version 13, while Oppo is unclear.
Connectivity
WiFi802.11ac, dual-band802.11ac, dual-bandBoth have similar WiFi capabilities.
Bluetooth5.0, various profiles5.0 LE, APT-x, LDACOppo A96 offers better audio codecs for high-quality wireless audio.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoOppo A96 supports additional satellite systems for potentially better location accuracy.
Storage
Internal Storage64 GB/128GB128GBBoth offer similar storage, however, the Samsung A32 also comes in a lower 64GB variant.
RAM4GB/6GB/8GB6GB/8GBOppo A96 has a higher base RAM configuration of 6GB, which can provide better multitasking performance.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither support expandable storage.
Security
Fingerprint SensorBasic sensorSide-mounted sensorOppo A96 has a more convenient side-mounted fingerprint sensor
Other
SensorsAccelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeAccelerometerSamsung A32 has a more comprehensive sensor suite.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A32 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED display offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better contrast compared to the Oppo A96's LCD. This leads to a more engaging media consumption experience.
  • More Versatile Cameras: Includes a dedicated wide-angle, portrait and macro lens, offering more flexibility in photography.
  • Comprehensive Sensor Suite: Offers more sensors, including a gyroscope for better gaming experience and motion detection.
  • Potentially Lower Price: Given the 64 GB version is available.

Oppo A96 Advantages:

  • Better Performance: The Snapdragon 680 chipset is more power-efficient and offers slightly better performance than the Helio G80 for daily tasks and light gaming.
  • Faster Charging: 33W fast charging significantly reduces charging times.
  • Better Wireless Audio: Supports aptX and LDAC codecs for higher quality audio over Bluetooth.
  • More Convenient Fingerprint Reader: The side-mounted fingerprint reader offers a more natural user experience.

Trade-offs:

  • Samsung A32 sacrifices some performance and charging speed for a superior display and more versatile camera setup.
  • Oppo A96 prioritizes performance, battery and quick charging, but uses an LCD screen and lacks some camera versatility.
  • Neither phone offers expandable storage

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A32 Ideal User:

  • Media Consumers: People who watch a lot of videos or browse social media and value a vibrant, high-contrast display.
  • Photography Enthusiasts (Casual): Users who enjoy experimenting with different camera angles, including wide-angle and macro shots.
  • Gamers (Casual): Those who play simple games that benefit from a more responsive display.

Use Cases for Samsung A32:

  • Watching movies and TV shows on the go.
  • Taking various photos, including landscapes and close-ups.
  • Casual gaming and browsing.

Oppo A96 Ideal User:

  • Practical Users: People who prioritize efficient performance, fast charging, and battery life for everyday tasks.
  • Audio Enthusiasts: Users who listen to music with wireless headphones and appreciate high-quality audio codecs.
  • Mobile Gamers: Those who play more intense games on their phone.

Use Cases for Oppo A96:

  • Daily multitasking, social media, and communication.
  • Quickly charging the phone throughout the day.
  • Listening to music and enjoying higher-quality audio with headphones.
  • Mobile gaming.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Display Preference: Do you value vibrant colors and contrast (AMOLED), or is a standard LCD screen sufficient?
  2. Camera Needs: Do you want versatile lenses for different types of shots, or is a standard main camera sufficient?
  3. Performance or Charging Speed: Do you value a marginally better performing device, or fast charging more?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1 (Media Lover): If you primarily use your phone for watching videos and want the best visual experience, choose the Samsung Galaxy A32 for its AMOLED screen.
  • Scenario 2 (On-the-Go User): If you frequently need a quick charge, and want a smoother overall experience, the Oppo A96 with its 33W fast charging is a better choice.
  • Scenario 3 (Balanced User): If you want a mix of features, and do not have a significant preference between display and performance, then the Oppo A96 offers a slightly newer processor and faster charging and can still provide a good all-round experience.

What I Would Choose and Why

Based on the analysis, I would choose the Oppo A96.

My reasoning is as follows:

  • Performance and Efficiency: The Snapdragon 680 offers a slight edge in performance and power efficiency, which aligns with my typical usage patterns which often involve multitasking and navigation.
  • Fast Charging: The inclusion of 33W fast charging would be hugely beneficial for my frequent need to top up my phone quickly throughout the day, this offers a more convenient overall experience.
  • Audio Quality: As someone who listens to music via Bluetooth headphones, the support for aptX and LDAC codecs makes a noticeable difference in audio quality.
  • Fingerprint Sensor: The side-mounted fingerprint reader is a much more convenient placement and offers a more natural user experience. While the AMOLED display of the Samsung Galaxy A32 is appealing, for my specific usage, the performance, charging speed, and audio quality benefits of the Oppo A96 outweigh the display advantage.
Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.