Samsung Galaxy A32 vs Motorola Razr 50 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola

General

Launch Date February 25, 2021 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 98.24 cm³ 92.54 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.48 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 184 g 188.4 g
Height 158.9 mm 171.3 mm
Width 73.6 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 7.3 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • Koala Grey (Steel Wool)
  • Beach Sand (Pumice Stone)
  • Spritz Orange (Arabesque)

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.6 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 411 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.9 mAh/cm³ 45.39 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32Motorola Razr 50Practical Impact
Design
Form FactorStandardFoldableRazr 50 offers a unique foldable design, enabling a compact form when closed and a larger screen when open, offering portability and versatility compared to the standard design of the A32.
Dimensions158.9 × 73.6 × 8.4 mm171.3 × 74 × 7.3 mmRazr 50 is taller but thinner; A32 is more compact when not taking the foldable aspect into account
Weight184g188.4gNegligible difference in hand feel.
Display
Size6.4"6.9"Razr 50 provides a more immersive experience for media consumption and multitasking due to the larger screen size.
Resolution1080x24001080x2640Razr 50 has slightly more detail (10% more pixels) due to higher resolution.
Pixel Density411 PPI413 PPIBoth offer similar sharpness; negligible difference to the human eye.
TechnologyAMOLEDUnknownA32 offers deeper blacks, higher contrast, and more vibrant colors; Razr 50 display technology is not specified.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzRazr 50 will feel slightly smoother during scrolling and animations due to a higher refresh rate.
Brightness0 nits3000 nitsRazr 50 offers vastly superior outdoor visibility in sunlight. A32’s lack of a brightness spec makes it hard to accurately measure.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G80 (12 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm)Razr 50 has a significantly more powerful and efficient chipset, resulting in faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
AnTuTu Score200,458620,395Razr 50 has 209% higher benchmark scores, indicating a dramatically faster overall experience.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G615 MC2Razr 50's better GPU translates to higher gaming performance, and enhanced graphics in apps.
Camera
Main Camera Resolution64MP50MPA32 has higher megapixel count, potentially leading to more detailed images in good lighting.
Main Camera Aperturef/1.8f/1.8Similar low light capabilities; aperture is identical
Main Camera Pixel SizeUnknown0.70 µmRazr 50 captures more light per pixel, potentially better low light. A32 unknown
Selfie Camera Resolution20MP32MPRazr 50 offers higher detail in selfies.
Selfie Camera Aperturef/2.2f/2.4A32 has a wider aperture, which theoretically allows slightly better low-light selfies
Wide Angle Resolution8MP13MPRazr 50 captures more detail in wide-angle shots.
Portrait (depth) lens5MPNoneA32 has a dedicated depth sensor for portrait mode; Razr 50 lacks this.
Macro Lens5MPNoneA32 can take close-up macro shots; Razr 50 lacks a dedicated macro lens.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@60fpsRazr 50 offers significantly higher video quality and smoother recording options, with stabilization features.
Video StabilizationNoYesRazr 50 offers enhanced stability during video recording.
Slow-motionNo, 30 fpsYes, 120 fpsRazr 50 supports slow-motion recording with higher frame rate.
Camera DXOMarkNone92Razr 50 offers a decent main camera performance.
Camera FeaturesDigital zoom, Quadruple camera, Autofocus, Touch focus, Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timerTime-Lapse, 4K Video, Digital zoom, Dual camera, Digital image stabilization, Optical Stabilization (OIS), Ultra stable video, Autofocus, Touch focus, Phase detection autofocus (PDAF), Laser autofocus (LAF), Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer, RAW, Night VisionRazr 50 has more advanced video and image stabilization features, and also includes RAW capture and night vision mode.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh4200 mAhA32 has a larger battery, likely providing longer battery life between charges.
ChargingLi-Ion30W Fast Charging, Li-PolymerRazr 50 features significantly faster charging using Li-Polymer tech
FeaturesNon-removableReverse Charging, Non-removable, 15W Wireless ChargingRazr 50 can wirelessly charge and reverse charge other devices.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A32 Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: Offers a 5000mAh battery compared to the Razr 50’s 4200mAh, potentially resulting in longer battery life.
  • Dedicated Macro and Depth Sensors: Includes dedicated macro and depth sensors, useful for close-up shots and portrait mode effects.
  • AMOLED Display: Known for vibrant colors, deep blacks, and energy efficiency.
  • More audio features: Has many more audio profiles supported via Bluetooth compared to the Razr 50

Motorola Razr 50 Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Offers unique portability and a larger display in a compact form factor, allowing for flexible usage.
  • Superior Performance: The Dimensity 7300X chipset provides significantly faster performance and smoother multitasking than the Helio G80.
  • Significantly brighter Display: A 3000 nit brightness makes the Razr 50 very usable outdoors.
  • Higher Refresh Rate: 120Hz display provides smoother scrolling and animations compared to the A32’s 90Hz.
  • Significantly Better Video capabilities: The Motorola Razr 50 includes 4k recording with image stabilization, as well as better slow motion at 120fps compared to the 30fps slow motion on the A32
  • Faster Charging: The Razr 50 offers 30W fast charging, significantly faster than the A32, which doesn’t have fast charging specifications.
  • Wireless and Reverse Charging: Razr 50 supports wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, while the A32 has none of those capabilities.
  • More Modern Software: The Razr 50 ships with Android 14 whereas the A32 ships with Android 11
  • More modern connectivity: The Razr 50 has support for WiFi 6 and 6E, along with Bluetooth 5.3. The A32 only has support for older wifi and Bluetooth 5.0

Significant Trade-offs:

  • Battery Life: The A32 has a larger battery, which might translate to longer use time between charges, at the cost of the Razr 50 having faster charging and wireless/reverse charging capabilities.
  • Camera Versatility: The A32 offers more camera lenses at the cost of image processing and video capabilities, while the Razr 50 focuses on high quality images and video
  • Software updates: The A32 is older and its OS updates have an end of life, while the Razr 50 will get updates for some time.
  • Durability: The foldable display of the Razr 50 may be more susceptible to damage in case of drops.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A32 Ideal Users:

  • Budget-Conscious Users: Seeking a reliable phone with a decent display and battery life without breaking the bank.
  • Users Prioritizing Battery Life: Those who need a phone that can last a full day with heavy usage, without needing a charge.
  • Casual Photographers: Users who want some flexibility in photography with macro and depth lenses but are not heavy video users.
  • Users who dislike the foldable form factor: The A32 may be suitable for those who prefer the reliability of a standard smartphone and aren't a fan of foldables

Use Cases for Samsung Galaxy A32:

  • Everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and basic photography.
  • Long days away from a power outlet.
  • Casual photography with good results in daylight.

Motorola Razr 50 Ideal Users:

  • Tech Enthusiasts: Those who appreciate innovative design and cutting-edge features.
  • Users Prioritizing Performance: Gamers and users who need smooth multitasking and fast app loading.
  • Frequent Content Creators: Those who record high-quality videos and take lots of photos.
  • Users Prioritizing Display Quality: Those who need a brighter, smoother display for outdoor use.
  • Travelers: The foldable nature and ability to charge wirelessly makes the Razr 50 a great travel companion.
  • Those who want the most modern version of Android and longer software support

Use Cases for Motorola Razr 50:

  • Demanding mobile gaming, video editing, and heavy multitasking.
  • Capturing high-resolution videos and photos in various lighting conditions.
  • Outdoor usage, such as in bright sunlight, due to the high brightness display.
  • Travel and easy transportation due to foldable form factor
  • Being on the latest version of android and software support

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Do you prioritize a unique form factor (foldable design) and advanced features, or are you satisfied with a standard smartphone design?
  2. Is battery life or performance a more important factor for your usage patterns?
  3. Do you do more video creation or still photography with a need for specialized lens, or are high quality video and image processing more of an interest to you?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Budget-conscious user needing long battery life for everyday tasks: The Samsung Galaxy A32 is the better option due to its larger battery, acceptable display, and additional lens options.
  • Scenario 2: Performance-oriented user creating and consuming high quality media: The Motorola Razr 50 is the better choice, due to its superior chipset, better video capabilities, fast charging, and higher brightness display.
  • Scenario 3: Someone who values innovative design and portability: The Motorola Razr 50 due to its foldable nature, fast charging and modern software/hardware makes it a great choice.

Personal Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would select the Motorola Razr 50. Here’s why:

  1. Performance is Key: The significantly faster chipset and better GPU of the Razr 50 make it a much more capable device for demanding tasks like gaming and multitasking. As a power user, this is a must.
  2. Modern Features: The foldable design, 120Hz display, faster charging, and better video capabilities on the Razr 50 all make it a more modern and feature-rich device.
  3. Superior display: The brightness of 3000 nits makes the phone ideal for use even under direct sunlight.
  4. Future proof: The modern software version, as well as support for newer technologies like Wifi 6, 6E, Bluetooth 5.3, combined with the powerful processor ensure the phone will be functional for many years.
  5. Foldable Innovation: The unique foldable form factor offers versatility and portability.

While the A32 has a larger battery and some additional lenses, the performance advantages, superior display quality and design of the Razr 50 are more aligned with my priorities.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.